Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence due to systemic sclerosis

Background: Faecal incontinence occurs in over one third of patients with systemic sclerosis. The aetiology is multifactorial. Conventional treatment is often unsuccessful. Sacral nerve stimulation is a new effective treatment for resistant faecal incontinence. Aims: To evaluate sacral nerve stimulation in patients with systemic sclerosis. Patients: Five women, median age 61 years (30–71), with scleroderma associated faecal incontinence were evaluated. All had failed maximal conventional treatment. Median number of preoperative weekly episodes of incontinence was 15 (7–25), median duration of incontinence was five years (5–9), and scleroderma 13 years (4–29). Methods: All patients were screened with temporary stimulation. Those who benefited underwent permanent implantation. At baseline and after stimulation a bowel diary, the SF-36 quality of life assessment, endoanal ultrasound, and anorectal physiology were performed. Results: Four patients were continent at a median follow up of 24 months (6–60). One patient failed temporary stimulation and was not permanently implanted. The weekly episodes of incontinence decreased from 15, 11, 23, and 7 to 0. Urgency resolved (median time to defer <1 minute (0–1) v 12.5 minutes (5–15)). Quality of life, especially social function, improved. Endoanal ultrasound showed an atrophic internal anal sphincter (median width 1.0 mm (0–1.6)). Anorectal physiology showed an increase in median resting pressure (37 pre v 65 cm H2O post) and squeeze pressure (89 v 105 cm H2O). Stimulation produced enhanced rectal sensitivity to distension. There were no major complications. Conclusions: Sacral nerve stimulation is a safe and effective treatment for resistant faecal incontinence secondary to scleroderma. The benefit is maintained in the medium term.

[1]  R. Schiessel,et al.  Sacral nerve stimulation as a treatment for fecal incontinence. , 2001, Gastroenterology.

[2]  M. Kamm,et al.  Permanent sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. , 2000, Annals of surgery.

[3]  C. Baeten Safety and efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence , 2000 .

[4]  L. Påhlman,et al.  Safety and efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence: report of a prospective, multicenter trial. Dynamic Graciloplasty Therapy Study Group. , 2000, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[5]  M. Matucci Cerinic,et al.  Systemic sclerosis. A clinical overview. , 1999, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[6]  S. Laurberg,et al.  Bowel problems in patients with systemic sclerosis. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[7]  G. Coutts,et al.  Fecal incontinence in scleroderma: assessment of the anal sphincter with thin-section endoanal MR imaging. , 1998, Radiology.

[8]  M. Kamm,et al.  Progressive systemic sclerosis of the internal anal sphincter leading to passive faecal incontinence. , 1994, Gut.

[9]  A Coulter,et al.  Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. , 1993, BMJ.

[10]  M. Camilleri,et al.  Anorectal dysfunction and rectal prolapse in progressive systemic sclerosis , 1993, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[11]  A. Silman Epidemiology of scleroderma , 1991, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[12]  L. Turnberg,et al.  Interdiestive Motor Activity in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis , 1982 .

[13]  L. Turnberg,et al.  Interdigestive motor activity in patients with systemic sclerosis. , 1982, Gastroenterology.