The effect of temporal adaptation granularity and game genre on the time-balancing abilities of adaptive time-varying minigames

Abstract Game designers spend a great deal of time developing well-balanced game experiences. However, differences in player ability, hardware capacity (e.g. network connections) or game mechanic constraints make it difficult to balance games for all players in all conditions. Adaptive balancing systems have been employed in an attempt to automatically compensate for these differences in real time as the game is being played. However, due to the complex non-linear mechanics underlying modern games, automated balancing systems can be highly unstable for all but the simplest mechanics, restricting the design space. In prior work we advanced the concept of using adaptive minigames deployed from within a larger game to decouple the adaptive mechanics from the main game mechanics. In particular, we looked at time-adaptive minigames (ATMs) which attempt to control the time to completion of a minigame. In this paper, we extend the ATM framework with additional time-adaptation algorithms and analyze the interaction between adaptive algorithm, game mechanic, and game difficulty in a controlled experiment. We find significant effects and interactions for all three factors, confirming our intuition that these processes are important and linked. We further find that finer temporal granularity leads to less-perceptible adaptation and smaller deviations in game completion times. This work provides an empirically-grounded algorithmic foundation for the design and practical deployment of ATMs in larger games, a foundation that can improve the balance and experience in these games.

[1]  Rainer Malaka Entertainment Computing , 2014, Informatik-Spektrum.

[2]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Time Balancing with Adaptive Time-Variant Minigames , 2011, ICEC.

[3]  Carlos Delgado-Mata,et al.  From competitive to social two-player videogames , 2009, WOCCI.

[4]  Alex Sandro Gomes,et al.  Dynamic Game Balancing: An Evaluation of User Satisfaction , 2006, AIIDE.

[5]  Steve Benford,et al.  Can you see me now? , 2006, TCHI.

[6]  David R. Flatla,et al.  Calibration games: making calibration tasks enjoyable by adding motivating game elements , 2011, UIST.

[7]  Bastian Leibe,et al.  MIND-WARPING: towards creating a compelling collaborative augmented reality game , 2000, IUI '00.

[8]  Jürgen Scheible,et al.  Combining Web, Mobile Phones and Public Displays in Large-Scale: Manhattan Story Mashup , 2007, Pervasive.

[9]  Susanne Boll,et al.  Paper chase revisited: a real world game meets hypermedia , 2003, HYPERTEXT '03.

[10]  Gillian Smith,et al.  PCG-based game design: creating Endless Web , 2012, FDG.

[11]  Peta Wyeth,et al.  GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games , 2005, CIE.

[12]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  PLATO: a coordination framework for designers of multi-player real-time digital games , 2012, FDG.

[13]  T. C. Nicholas Graham,et al.  Heart rate control of exercise video games , 2009, Graphics Interface.

[14]  I.,et al.  Fitts' Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[15]  Bob Bates,et al.  Game Design , 2004 .

[16]  Keith Burgun On Game Design , 2012 .

[17]  William V. Wright,et al.  A Theory of Fun for Game Design , 2004 .