Augmented reality-assisted biopsy of soft tissue lesions

Guided biopsy of soft tissue lesions can be challenging in the presence of sensitive organs or when the lesion itself is small. Computed tomography (CT) is the most frequently used modality to target soft tissue lesions. In order to aid physicians, small field of view (FOV) low dose non-contrast CT volumes are acquired prior to intervention while the patient is on the procedure table to localize the lesion and plan the best approach. However, patient motion between the end of the scan and the start of the biopsy procedure can make it difficult for a physician to translate the lesion location from the CT onto the patient body, especially for a deep-seated lesion. In addition, the needle should be managed well in three-dimensional trajectories in order to reach the lesion and avoid vital structures. This is especially challenging for less experienced interventionists. These usually result in multiple additional image acquisitions during the course of procedure to ensure accurate needle placement, especially when multiple core biopsies are required. In this work, we present an augmented reality (AR)-guided biopsy system and procedure for soft tissue and lung lesions and quantify the results using a phantom study. We found an average error of 0.75 cm from the center of the lesion when AR guidance was used, compared to an error of 1.52 cm from the center of the lesion during unguided biopsy for soft tissue lesions while upon testing the system on lung lesions, an average error of 0.62 cm from the center of the tumor while using AR guidance versus a 1.12 cm error while relying on unguided biopsies. The AR-guided system is able to improve the accuracy and could be useful in the clinical application.

[1]  H. Mankin,et al.  Accuracy of CT-guided needle biopsy of musculoskeletal neoplasms. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  Sang Min Lee,et al.  C-arm cone-beam CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy of lung nodules: clinical experience in 1108 patients. , 2014, Radiology.

[3]  Martin Hoßbach,et al.  Visual tracking for multi-modality computer-assisted image guidance , 2017, Medical Imaging.

[4]  Sheng Xu,et al.  Smartglasses/smartphone needle guidance AR system for transperineal prostate procedures , 2019, Medical Imaging.

[5]  V. M. Phillips,et al.  CT-guided adrenal biopsy: accuracy, safety, and indications. , 1985, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  G. Strauß,et al.  Image‐guided navigation: the surgeon's perspective on performance consequences and human factors issues , 2009, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[7]  Bart Jansen,et al.  Augmenting Microsoft's HoloLens with vuforia tracking for neuronavigation , 2018, Healthcare technology letters.

[8]  M. Torriani,et al.  Sonographically Guided Core Needle Biopsy of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors , 2002, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[9]  J. Krücker,et al.  Electromagnetic tracking for thermal ablation and biopsy guidance: clinical evaluation of spatial accuracy. , 2007, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[10]  Henry Fuchs,et al.  Augmented reality guidance for needle biopsies: An initial randomized, controlled trial in phantoms , 2002, Medical Image Anal..

[11]  Adam Rankin,et al.  Hologram stability evaluation for Microsoft HoloLens , 2017, Medical Imaging.

[12]  Lawrence Huang,et al.  Shared visualizations and guided procedure simulation in augmented reality with Microsoft HoloLens , 2019, Medical Imaging.

[13]  Andras Lasso,et al.  MRI-Guided Robotic Prostate Biopsy: A Clinical Accuracy Validation , 2010, MICCAI.

[14]  M. Gebhardt,et al.  Accuracy of CT-guided biopsies in 359 patients with musculoskeletal lesions , 2002, Skeletal Radiology.

[15]  Liron Pantanowitz,et al.  Augmented Reality Technology Using Microsoft HoloLens in Anatomic Pathology. , 2018, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.