Supporting responsible machine learning in heliophysics

Over the last decade, Heliophysics researchers have increasingly adopted a variety of machine learning methods such as artificial neural networks, decision trees, and clustering algorithms into their workflow. Adoption of these advanced data science methods had quickly outpaced institutional response, but many professional organizations such as the European Commission, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and the American Geophysical Union have now issued (or will soon issue) standards for artificial intelligence and machine learning that will impact scientific research. These standards add further (necessary) burdens on the individual researcher who must now prepare the public release of data and code in addition to traditional paper writing. Support for these is not reflected in the current state of institutional support, community practices, or governance systems. We examine here some of these principles and how our institutions and community can promote their successful adoption within the Heliophysics discipline.

[1]  M. Cannarsa Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI , 2021, The Cambridge Handbook of Lawyering in the Digital Age.

[2]  Joost Visser,et al.  Practices for Engineering Trustworthy Machine Learning Applications , 2021, 2021 IEEE/ACM 1st Workshop on AI Engineering - Software Engineering for AI (WAIN).

[3]  Donald J. Trump,et al.  Executive Order 13960: Promoting the Use of Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in the Federal Government , 2020 .

[4]  Emily Denton,et al.  Towards Accountability for Machine Learning Datasets: Practices from Software Engineering and Infrastructure , 2020, FAccT.

[5]  Emily J. Forsberg,et al.  Integrating Machine Learning for Planetary Science: Perspectives for the Next Decade , 2020, Bulletin of the AAS.

[6]  Report Series: Committee on Solar and Space Physics , 2020 .

[7]  Kevin Reardon,et al.  The SunPy Project: Open Source Development and Status of the Version 1.0 Core Package , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[8]  nasa,et al.  Solar and Space Physics: A Science for a Technological Society , 2019 .

[9]  Andreas Vogelsang,et al.  Requirements Engineering for Machine Learning: Perspectives from Data Scientists , 2019, 2019 IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW).

[10]  Enrico Camporeale,et al.  The Challenge of Machine Learning in Space Weather: Nowcasting and Forecasting , 2019, Space Weather.

[11]  Jennifer A. Joy-Gaba,et al.  The Reproducibility Project: A Model of Large-Scale Collaboration for Empirical Research on Reproducibility , 2018, Implementing Reproducible Research.

[12]  Benjamin D Lee,et al.  Ten simple rules for documenting scientific software , 2018, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  K. M. Laundal,et al.  Snakes on a Spaceship—An Overview of Python in Heliophysics , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics.

[14]  K. Cranmer,et al.  Open is not enough , 2018, Nature Physics.

[15]  Sean T. Manion,et al.  Open Science , 2018, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology.

[16]  Policy,et al.  Open Science by Design , 2018 .

[17]  Nikhil Ketkar,et al.  Deep Learning with Python , 2017 .

[18]  Erik Schultes,et al.  The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship , 2016, Scientific Data.

[19]  David Sloan Wilson,et al.  Generalizing the core design principles for the efficacy of groups , 2013, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.

[20]  N. Crooker Solar-Heliospheric Group “SHINE” Sheds light on murky problems , 2002 .

[21]  Keith W. Miller,et al.  Software engineering code of ethics , 1997, CACM.

[22]  Juan G. Roederer,et al.  GEM: Geospace Environment Modeling , 1988 .

[23]  T. Killeen,et al.  CEDAR: An aeronomy initiative , 1987 .

[24]  F. Hanson The Technological Society , 2013 .

[25]  周辉 北京大学濮祖荫教授被推选为国际著名期刊Journal of Geophysical Research——Space Physics的主编 , 2006 .

[26]  Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics Ushering in a New Frontier in Geospace Through Data Science , 2022 .