Automated Stimulus-Response Mapping of High-Electrode-Count Neural Implants

Over the past decade, research in the field of functional electrical stimulation (FES) has led to a new generation of high-electrode-count (HEC) devices that offer increasingly selective access to neural populations. Incorporation of these devices into research and clinical applications, however, has been hampered by the lack of hardware and software platforms capable of taking full advantage of them. In this paper, we present the first generation of a closed-loop FES platform built specifically for HEC neural interface devices. The platform was designed to support a wide range of stimulus-response mapping and feedback-based control routines. It includes a central control module, a 1100-channel stimulator, an array of biometric devices, and a 160-channel data recording module. To demonstrate the unique capabilities of this platform, two automated software routines for mapping stimulus-response properties of implanted HEC devices were implemented and tested. The first routine determines stimulation levels that produce perithreshold muscle activity, and the second generates recruitment curves (as measured by peak impulse response). Both routines were tested on 100-electrode Utah slanted electrode arrays (USEAs) implanted in cat hindlimb nerves using joint torque or EMG as muscle output metric. Mean time to map perithreshold stimulus level was 16.4 s for electrodes that evoked responses (n = 3200), and 3.6 s for electrodes that did not evoke responses (n = 1800). Mean time to locate recruitment curve asymptote for an electrode (n = 155) was 9.6 s , and each point in the recruitment curve required 0.87 s. These results demonstrate the utility of our FES platform by showing that it can be used to completely automate a typically time- and effort-intensive procedure associated with using HEC devices.

[1]  Closed-Loop Control for FES : Past Work and Future Directions Lynch CL , 2010 .

[2]  Peter G. LoPresti,et al.  Handbook of Neuroprosthetic Methods , 2002 .

[3]  W. H. Dobelle,et al.  Artificial vision for the blind. The summit may be closer than you think. , 1994, ASAIO journal.

[4]  Nigel H. Lovell,et al.  artificial vision for the BLIND , 2003 .

[5]  W. Rutten Selective electrical interfaces with the nervous system. , 2002, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[6]  P. Troyk,et al.  Implantable FES Stimulation Systems: What is Needed? , 2001, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[7]  P.T. Bhatti,et al.  A high-density electrode array for a cochlear prosthesis , 2003, TRANSDUCERS '03. 12th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems. Digest of Technical Papers (Cat. No.03TH8664).

[8]  V. Mushahwar,et al.  A Physiologically-based Controller for Generating Overground Locomotion using Functional Electrical Stimulation , 2007 .

[9]  M. Eisen,et al.  Djourno, Eyries, and the First Implanted Electrical Neural Stimulator to Restore Hearing , 2003, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[10]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  A critical review of interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of neuroprostheses and hybrid bionic systems , 2005, Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS.

[11]  K. Kilgore,et al.  Electrode characterization for functional application to upper extremity FNS , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  M Schulzer,et al.  The effect of age on the nerve fiber population of the human optic nerve. , 1984, American journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis , 2003, Vision Research.

[14]  Daryl R. Kipke,et al.  Wireless implantable microsystems: high-density electronic interfaces to the nervous system , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[15]  R. Stein,et al.  Selective stimulation of cat sciatic nerve using an array of varying-length microelectrodes. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  W. Durfee,et al.  Methods for estimating isometric recruitment curves of electrically stimulated muscle , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  R. Normann,et al.  Selective and Graded Recruitment of Cat Hamstring Muscles With Intrafascicular Stimulation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[18]  G Schalow The problem of cauda equina nerve root identification. , 1985, Zentralblatt fur Neurochirurgie.

[19]  A. Branner,et al.  A multielectrode array for intrafascicular recording and stimulation in sciatic nerve of cats , 2000, Brain Research Bulletin.

[20]  R. Normann,et al.  Interleaved, multisite electrical stimulation of cat sciatic nerve produces fatigue-resistant, ripple-free motor responses , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.