Blended learning in higher education: Students' perceptions and their relation to outcomes

New information and communication technologies (ICTs) provide educators and learners with an innovative learning environment to stimulate and enhance the teaching and learning process. In this context, novel educational concepts such as blended learning are being developed. In the present paper, we present the results obtained from a blended learning experience carried out at the University of Granada. A total of 17 groups took part, with 1431 students registered for the 2009-2010 academic year. In this study, we use objective outcomes and the students' perceptions regarding the blended learning activities performed. The study shows that the use of blended learning has a positive effect in reducing dropout rates and in improving exam marks. Moreover, the students' perceptions on blended learning are interrelated, with their final marks depending on the blended learning activities, and on the students' age, background and class attendance rate.

[1]  Patricia Clapp,et al.  Enhancing Adult Motivation to Learn. Raymond Wlodkowski. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1985. , 1987 .

[2]  J. Mitchell O'Toole,et al.  The Impact of Blended Learning on Student Outcomes: is there room on the horse for two? , 2003 .

[3]  K. Spitzer,et al.  Blended learning positively affects students’ satisfaction and the role of the tutor in the problem-based learning process: results of a mixed-method evaluation , 2009, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[4]  Kirsten McKenzie,et al.  Who Succeeds at University? Factors predicting academic performance in first year Australian university students , 2001 .

[5]  José Luis Arquero Montaño *,et al.  Skills development, motivation and learning in financial statement analysis: an evaluation of alternative types of case studies , 2004 .

[6]  David Lebow,et al.  Constructivist values for instructional systems design: Five principles toward a new mindset , 1993 .

[7]  Jing Lei,et al.  Quantity versus quality: A new approach to examine the relationship between technology use and student outcomes , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[8]  Carlin Dowling,et al.  Do hybrid flexible delivery teaching methods improve accounting students' learning outcomes? , 2003 .

[9]  S. Sugahara,et al.  The Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in the Accounting Classroom , 2006 .

[10]  Hsi-Peng Lu,et al.  The impact of individual differences on e-learning system satisfaction: A contingency approach , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[11]  P. Forer,et al.  Blended Learning: The Perceptions of First-year Geography Students , 2010 .

[12]  Charles R. Graham.  BLENDED LEARNING SYSTEMS: DEFINITION, CURRENT TRENDS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 2005 .

[13]  D. Garrison,et al.  Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[14]  Steve Truelove.  Handbook of training and development , 1992 .

[15]  Fiona H. Rohde,et al.  Performance in first year university accounting: Quantifying the advantage of secondary school accounting , 1996 .

[16]  J. Alan Wagar,et al.  Objectives and Evaluation in Interpretive Planning , 1973 .

[17]  Mary Keeffe,et al.  Self‐determined blended learning: a case study of blended learning design , 2010 .

[18]  S. Barrie,et al.  Students’ perceptions of teaching quality in higher education: the perspective of currently enrolled students , 2007 .

[19]  P. Goodyear,et al.  Networked Learning in Higher Education: Students’ Expectations and Experiences , 2005 .

[20]  Mark Chambers,et al.  The efficacy and ethics of using digital multimedia for educational purposes , 2002 .

[21]  Paul De Lange,et al.  Determinants of Students Success in First Year Open Learning Accounting , 2001 .

[22]  John Charles Stevenson,et al.  Performance of the cognitive holding power questionnaire in schools , 1998 .

[23]  Mark Capper,et al.  Exploiting the web for education: An anonymous asynchronous role simulation , 1999 .

[24]  Paul Ginns,et al.  Evaluating the quality of e-learning at the degree level in the student experience of blended learning , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[25]  Minjuan Wang,et al.  The impact of mobile learning on students' learning behaviours and performance: Report from a large blended classroom , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[26]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs , 2005 .

[27]  Brigitte Maier,et al.  Students' expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Tarsem Singh Cooner,et al.  Creating opportunities for students in large cohorts to reflect in and on practice: Lessons learnt from a formative evaluation of students' experiences of a technology-enhanced blended learning design , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[29]  S. M. Lee,et al.  Blended learning and online tutoring , 2009 .

[30]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  Blended Learning Environments , 2005 .

[31]  Alan Farley,et al.  Student Performance in First Year Tertiary Accounting Courses and Its Relationship to Secondary Accounting Education , 1988 .

[32]  Jackie Nicholas,et al.  Qualitatively different experiences of learning mathematics at university , 1998 .

[33]  M. Ford.  Motivating Humans: Goals, Emotions, and Personal Agency Beliefs , 1992 .

[34]  Roisin Donnelly,et al.  Harmonizing technology with interaction in blended problem-based learning , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[35]  Sevgi Özkan,et al.  Multi-dimensional students' evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[36]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology , 1993 .

[37]  Christine A. Taylor.  Enhancing Adult Motivation to Learn , 2000 .

[38]  Doo H. Lim,et al.  Perceived Differences between Classroom and Distance Education: Seeking Instructional Strategies for Learning Applications. , 2002 .

[39]  Ellen D. Wagner,et al.  In Support of a Functional Definition of Interaction , 1994 .

[40]  Doo Hun Lim,et al.  Learner and Instructional Factors Influencing Learning Outcomes within a Blended Learning Environment , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[41]  Allyn Radford.  The Future of Multimedia in Education , 1997, First Monday.

[42]  Fiona H. Rohde,et al.  Determinants of performance in advanced undergraduate management accounting: An empirical investigation , 2002 .

[43]  Maureen Tam,et al.  Constructivism, Instructional Design, and Technology: Implications for Transforming Distance Learning , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[44]  Shirley Alexander,et al.  An Evaluation of Innovative Projects Involving Communication and Information Technology in Higher Education , 1999 .

[45]  Ansie Harding,et al.  Evaluation of blended learning: analysis of qualitative data , 2012 .

[46]  Ray Jones,et al.  Using Blended Learning to Improve Student Success Rates in Learning to Program , 2003 .

[47]  Marian Matthews,et al.  Acceptability of Accounting Learning and Teaching Through the World Wide Web , 2000 .

[48]  文部省大臣官房調査課.  OECD教育研究・革新センター : centre for educational research and innovation : CERI , 1969 .

[49]  Branka Spehar,et al.  Resource use and academic performance among first year psychology students , 2007 .

[50]  Muriel Ney,et al.  Students' performance and satisfaction with Web vs. paper-based practice quizzes and lecture notes , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[51]  D. H. Lim,et al.  Motivation and Learner Characteristics Affecting Online Learning and Learning Application , 2003 .

[52]  Kate Orton-Johnson,et al.  'I've stuck to the path I'm afraid': exploring student non-use of blended learning , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[53]  Ted Nunan,et al.  Rethinking the Ways in which Teaching and Learning are Supported: The Flexible Learning Centre at the University of South Australia , 2000 .

[54]  N. Paisey,et al.  Student attendance in an accounting module – reasons for non-attendance and the effect on academic performance at a Scottish University , 2004 .