Minimal residual disease assessed by multiparameter flow cytometry in multiple myeloma: impact on outcome in the Medical Research Council Myeloma IX Study.

PURPOSE To investigate the prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment in patients with multiple myeloma treated in the MRC (Medical Research Council) Myeloma IX trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) was used to assess MRD after induction therapy (n = 378) and at day 100 after autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT; n = 397) in intensive-pathway patients and at the end of induction therapy in non-intensive-pathway patients (n = 245). RESULTS In intensive-pathway patients, absence of MRD at day 100 after ASCT was highly predictive of a favorable outcome (PFS, P < .001; OS, P = .0183). This outcome advantage was demonstrable in patients with favorable and adverse cytogenetics (PFS, P = .014 and P < .001, respectively) and in patients achieving immunofixation-negative complete response (CR; PFS, P = .0068). The effect of maintenance thalidomide was assessed, with the shortest PFS demonstrable in those MRD-positive patients who did not receive maintenance and longest in those who were MRD negative and did receive thalidomide (P < .001). Further analysis demonstrated that 28% of MRD-positive patients who received maintenance thalidomide became MRD negative. MRD assessment after induction therapy in the non-intensive-pathway patients did not seem to be predictive of outcome (PFS, P = .1). CONCLUSION MRD assessment by MFC was predictive of overall outcome in patients with myeloma undergoing ASCT. This predictive value was seen in patients achieving conventional CR as well as patients with favorable and adverse cytogenetics. The effects of maintenance strategies can also be evaluated, and our data suggest that maintenance thalidomide can eradicate MRD in some patients.

[1]  L. Medeiros,et al.  Immunophenotypic heterogeneity of normal plasma cells: comparison with minimal residual plasma cell myeloma , 2012, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[2]  G. Morgan,et al.  Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients destined for autologous stem-cell transplantation: MRC Myeloma IX randomized trial results , 2012, Haematologica.

[3]  G. Morgan,et al.  The role of maintenance thalidomide therapy in multiple myeloma: MRC Myeloma IX results and meta-analysis. , 2012, Blood.

[4]  M. Terol,et al.  High-risk cytogenetics and persistent minimal residual disease by multiparameter flow cytometry predict unsustained complete response after autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. , 2012, Blood.

[5]  G. Morgan,et al.  Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTD) as initial therapy for patients with multiple myeloma unsuitable for autologous transplantation. , 2011, Blood.

[6]  J. Besalduch,et al.  Long-term prognostic significance of response in multiple myeloma after stem cell transplantation. , 2011, Blood.

[7]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1. , 2011, Blood.

[8]  A. Órfão,et al.  Comparison of immunofixation, serum free light chain, and immunophenotyping for response evaluation and prognostication in multiple myeloma. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  E. Ocio,et al.  The clinical utility and prognostic value of multiparameter flow cytometry immunophenotyping in light-chain amyloidosis. , 2011, Blood.

[10]  P. Sonneveld,et al.  Complete response correlates with long-term progression-free and overall survival in elderly myeloma treated with novel agents: analysis of 1175 patients. , 2011, Blood.

[11]  G. Morgan,et al.  First-line treatment with zoledronic acid as compared with clodronic acid in multiple myeloma (MRC Myeloma IX): a randomised controlled trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[12]  M. Terol,et al.  Analysis of Immunophenotypic Response (IR) by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry In 516 Myeloma Patients Included In Three Consecutive Spanish Trials , 2010 .

[13]  Armanda D. Tatsas,et al.  Monitoring residual myeloma: high-resolution serum/urine electrophoresis or marrow biopsy with immunohistochemical analysis? , 2010, American journal of clinical pathology.

[14]  A. Órfão,et al.  Risk of progression in smouldering myeloma and monoclonal gammopathies of unknown significance: comparative analysis of the evolution of monoclonal component and multiparameter flow cytometry of bone marrow plasma cells , 2010, British journal of haematology.

[15]  A. Órfão,et al.  The persistence of immunophenotypically normal residual bone marrow plasma cells at diagnosis identifies a good prognostic subgroup of symptomatic multiple myeloma patients. , 2009, Blood.

[16]  L. Kumar,et al.  Flow cytometric immunophenotyping and minimal residual disease analysis in multiple myeloma. , 2009, American journal of clinical pathology.

[17]  A. Órfão,et al.  Multiparameter flow cytometry quantification of bone marrow plasma cells at diagnosis provides more prognostic information than morphological assessment in myeloma patients , 2009, Haematologica.

[18]  G. Morgan,et al.  A346 Prospective Study of Serum FLC and Other M-Protein Assays: When and How to Measure Response? , 2009 .

[19]  L. Escoda,et al.  Influence of pre- and post-transplantation responses on outcome of patients with multiple myeloma: sequential improvement of response and achievement of complete response are associated with longer survival. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  A. Órfão,et al.  Multiparameter flow cytometric remission is the most relevant prognostic factor for multiple myeloma patients who undergo autologous stem cell transplantation. , 2008, Blood.

[21]  D. Esseltine,et al.  The relationship between quality of response and clinical benefit for patients treated on the bortezomib arm of the international, randomized, phase 3 APEX trial in relapsed multiple myeloma , 2008, British journal of haematology.

[22]  Marina Ruggeri,et al.  Report of the European Myeloma Network on multiparametric flow cytometry in multiple myeloma and related disorders , 2008, Haematologica.

[23]  D. Dingli,et al.  Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. , 2008, Blood.

[24]  H. van de Velde,et al.  Complete response correlates with long-term survival and progression-free survival in high-dose therapy in multiple myeloma , 2007, Haematologica.

[25]  A. Órfão,et al.  New criteria to identify risk of progression in monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance and smoldering multiple myeloma based on multiparameter flow cytometry analysis of bone marrow plasma cells. , 2007, Blood.

[26]  P. Greipp,et al.  Novel multi-parameter flow cytometry sensitively detects phenotypically distinct plasma cell subsets in plasma cell proliferative disorders , 2007, Leukemia.

[27]  G. Morgan,et al.  A single-tube six-colour flow cytometry screening assay for the detection of minimal residual disease in myeloma , 2007, Leukemia.

[28]  B. Barlogie,et al.  International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma , 2006, Leukemia.

[29]  A. Rawstron,et al.  Minimal residual disease monitoring in multiple myeloma: flow cytometry is the method of choice , 2005, British journal of haematology.

[30]  M. Boccadoro,et al.  Real-time polymerase chain reaction of immunoglobulin rearrangements for quantitative evaluation of minimal residual disease in myeloma. , 2005, Methods in molecular medicine.

[31]  Marcos González,et al.  Minimal residual disease monitoring in multiple myeloma: a comparison between allelic-specific oligonucleotide real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and flow cytometry. , 2005, Haematologica.

[32]  J. Crowley,et al.  Magnitude of response with myeloma frontline therapy does not predict outcome: importance of time to progression in southwest oncology group chemotherapy trials. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  G. Morgan,et al.  High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  G. Morgan,et al.  Flow cytometric disease monitoring in multiple myeloma: the relationship between normal and neoplastic plasma cells predicts outcome after transplantation. , 2002, Blood.

[35]  G. Morgan,et al.  The impact of attaining a minimal disease state after high‐dose melphalan and autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma , 2001, British journal of haematology.

[36]  S. Jagannath,et al.  CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING DISEASE RESPONSE AND PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE MYELOMA TREATED BY HIGH‐DOSE THERAPY AND HAEMOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION , 1998, British journal of haematology.

[37]  J. Rossi,et al.  A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation and Chemotherapy in Multiple Myeloma , 1996 .

[38]  M. Drayson,et al.  Current Issues in Cancer: Multiple myeloma , 1994 .