Speed to Market for Innovative Products: Blessing or Curse?

The relationships among speed to market, quality, and costs are important to managers as they attempt to best establish incentives and set goals for new product development teams, allocate resources for new product development, or create positional advantage in the market. The existing literature suggests that the economic consequences of being late to the market are significant, including higher development and manufacturing costs, lower profit margins, and lessening of the firm's market value. Therefore, traditional logic has held that new product development managers need to manage the trade-offs among speed to market, quality, and costs. While both scholars and managers have often acquiesced to performance trade-offs among “faster, better, and cheaper,” this research attempts to improve understanding of the interrelationships between these objectives, and ultimately profit. Based on a survey of 197 managers, faster speed to market is shown to be related to better quality and lower costs; it is not necessary to sacrifice one of these outcomes. Further, the moderating roles of two dimensions of innovativeness (innovativeness to the firm and to the market) are examined on the relationships between speed and quality, as well as speed and profit. Both dimensions of innovativeness positively moderate the relationship between speed to market and quality. For more innovative products (both to the firm and the market), there is a stronger positive relationship between speed and quality than for less innovative products. Further, innovativeness to the firm negatively moderates the relationship between speed and profit. Thus, speed has a less positive impact on profit for highly innovative-to-the-firm products compared with less innovative-to-the-firm products. By being conscious of the projects’ levels of innovativeness (along with prioritizing various performance measures), managers can more rationally decide when to emphasize speed to market based on this study's findings.

[1]  Richard R. Reilly,et al.  Understanding Antecedents of New Product Development Speed: A Meta-Analysis , 2010 .

[2]  A. Griffin,et al.  Balancing development costs and sales to optimize the development time of product line additions , 2010 .

[3]  Gerard A. Athaide,et al.  Consumer Innovativeness and the Use of New versus Extended Brand Names for New Products , 2010 .

[4]  Francisco J. Molina-Castillo,et al.  New product performance indicators: Time horizon and importance attributed by managers ☆ , 2009 .

[5]  Mitzi M. Montoya,et al.  Exploring New Product Development Project Review Practices , 2009 .

[6]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Can You Hear Me Now? Communication in Virtual Product Development Teams* , 2009 .

[7]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  Exploring Mediating and Moderating Influences on the Links between Cycle Time, Proficiency in Entry Timing and New Product Profitability , 2008 .

[8]  R. Gulati.  Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation ? , 2007 .

[9]  Judy A. Siguaw,et al.  Innovation orientation outcomes: The good and the bad , 2006 .

[10]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  Decomposing Product Innovativeness and Its Effects on New Product Success , 2006 .

[11]  Srinivas Talluri,et al.  Faster, better, cheaper: A study of NPD project efficiency and performance tradeoffs , 2006 .

[12]  Michael A. Allocca,et al.  Innovation Speed in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises , 2006 .

[13]  Fred Langerak,et al.  The Impact of Product Innovativeness on the Link between Development Speed and New Product Profitability , 2006 .

[14]  Pilar Carbonell,et al.  The impact of market characteristics and innovation speed on perceptions of positional advantage and new product performance , 2006 .

[15]  V. Pucik,et al.  Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value , 2005 .

[16]  Richard R. Reilly,et al.  The impacts of speed-to-market on new product success: the moderating effects of uncertainty , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[17]  Fred Langerak,et al.  The impact of new product development acceleration approaches on speed and profitability: lessons for pioneers and fast followers , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[18]  S. Vickery,et al.  The effects of internal versus external integration practices on time-based performance and overall firm performance , 2004 .

[19]  B. Lukas,et al.  New product quality: intended and unintended consequences of new product development speed , 2004 .

[20]  G. Soutar,et al.  Measuring new product success: an empirical investigation of Australian SMEs , 2004 .

[21]  John Saunders,et al.  Prepaid monetary incentive effects on mail survey response , 2004 .

[22]  Hans-Georg Gemünden,et al.  Interteam Coordination, Project Commitment, and Teamwork in Multiteam R&D Projects: A Longitudinal Study , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[23]  Morgan Swink,et al.  Completing projects on-time: how project acceleration affects new product development , 2003 .

[24]  J. Baum,et al.  STRATEGIC DECISION SPEED AND FIRM PERFORMANCE , 2003 .

[25]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  The Effects of Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces on Product Development Speed and Quality: How Does Problem Solving Matter? , 2003 .

[27]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  The Effects of Environmental Turbulence on New Product Development Strategy Planning , 2003 .

[28]  Yikuan Lee,et al.  The Impact of Communication Strategy on Launching New Products: The Moderating Role of Product Innovativeness , 2003 .

[29]  Peter R. Dickson,et al.  Getting Return on Quality: Revenue Expansion, Cost Reduction, or Both? , 2002 .

[30]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and Characteristics , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[31]  Eric H. Kessler,et al.  Is faster really better? An empirical test of the implications of innovation speed , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[32]  S. Bell,et al.  Organizing for new product development speed and the implications for organizational stress , 2002 .

[33]  A. Griffin.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CYCLE TIME FOR BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS PRODUCTS , 2002 .

[34]  B. Lukas,et al.  Antecedents and outcomes of new product development speed: An interdisciplinary conceptual framework , 2002 .

[35]  Peter S. Davis,et al.  The impact of time on the strategy–performance relationship: Implications for managers , 2002 .

[36]  Erwin Danneels,et al.  Product innovativeness from the firm's perspective: Its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance , 2001 .

[37]  David M. Szymanski,et al.  Why Some New Products are More Successful than Others , 2001 .

[38]  C. Moorman,et al.  The Acquisition and Utilization of Information in New Product Alliances: A Strength-of-Ties Perspective , 2001 .

[39]  Mohan V. Tatikonda,et al.  Integrating Operations and Marketing Perspectives of Product Innovation: The Influence of Organizational Process Factors and Capabilities on Development Performance , 2001 .

[40]  Rajesh Sethi.  New Product Quality and Product Development Teams , 2000 .

[41]  F. Dwyer,et al.  An Examination of Organizational Factors Influencing New Product Success in Internal and Alliance-Based Processes , 2000 .

[42]  Chris Storey,et al.  Types of New Product Performance: Evidence from the Consumer Financial Services Sector , 1999 .

[43]  A. Chakrabarti,et al.  Speeding Up the Pace of New Product Development , 1999 .

[44]  Kate D. Abel,et al.  Practices that Support Team Learning and Their Impact on Speed to Market and New Product Success , 1999 .

[45]  Michael Song,et al.  Manuscript #: RRR97-0379 THE EFFECT OF PERCEIVED TECHNOLOGICAL UNCERTAINTY ON JAPANESE NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1999 .

[46]  Christine Moorman,et al.  The Convergence of Planning and Execution: Improvisation in New Product Development , 1998 .

[47]  W. Souder,et al.  Key Drivers of Reduced Cycle Time , 1998 .

[48]  B. Bayus.  Speed‐to‐Market and New Product Performance Trade‐offs , 1997 .

[49]  K. B. Hendricks,et al.  Delays in new product introductions and the market value of the firm: the consequences of being late to the market , 1997 .

[50]  D. Larcker,et al.  Product Development Cycle Time and Organizational Performance , 1997 .

[51]  A. Griffin,et al.  PDMA Success Measurement Project: Recommended Measures for Product Development Success and Failure , 1996 .

[52]  A. Chakrabarti,et al.  Innovation Speed: A Conceptual Model of Context, Antecedents, and Outcomes , 1996 .

[53]  B. J. Zirger,et al.  The effect of acceleration techniques on product development time , 1996 .

[54]  Teck-Hua Ho,et al.  New product development: the performance and time-to-market tradeoff , 1996 .

[55]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  Product development cycle time and commercial success , 1995 .

[56]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  An exploratory analysis of the impact of market orientation on new product performance a contingency approach , 1995 .

[57]  Abdul Ali,et al.  Product innovativeness and entry strategy: Impact on cycle time and break-even time , 1995 .

[58]  R. Cooper,et al.  Determinants of Timeliness in Product Development , 1994 .

[59]  G. Tellis,et al.  Pioneer Advantage: Marketing Logic or Marketing Legend? , 1993 .

[60]  S. Karau,et al.  The effects of time scarcity and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process. , 1992 .

[61]  C. Crawford.  The Hidden Costs of Accelerated Product Development , 1992 .

[62]  V. Zeithaml,et al.  Price and brand name as indicators of quality dimensions for consumer durables , 2000 .

[63]  F. Yammarino,et al.  Identifying Common Methods Variance With Data Collected From A Single Source: An Unresolved Sticky Issue , 1991 .

[64]  E. Mansfield.  The speed and cost of industrial innovation in Japan and the United States: external vs. internal technology , 1988 .

[65]  V. Zeithaml.  Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence: , 1988 .

[66]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  First‐mover advantages , 1988 .

[67]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[68]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[69]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[70]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .