Disability and Information Technology: A Comparative Study in Media Regulation

Disability and Information Technology examines the extent to which regulatory frameworks for information and communication technologies (ICTs) safeguard the rights of persons with disabilities as citizenship rights. It adopts a comparative approach focused on four case studies: Canada, the European Union, the United Kingdom and the United States. It focuses on the tension between social and economic values in the regulation of ICTs and calls for a regulatory approach based on a framework of principles that reflects citizenship values. The analysis identifies challenges encountered in the jurisdictions examined and points toward the rights-based approach advanced by the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities as a benchmark in protecting the rights of persons with disabilities to have equal access to information. The research draws on a wealth of resources, including legislation, cases, interviews, consultation documents and responses from organisations representing persons with disabilities.

[1]  Anthony E. Varona.  Changing Channels and Bridging Divides: The Failure and Redemption of American Broadcast Television Regulation , 2006 .

[2]  Eilionóir Flynn,et al.  European Yearbook of Disability Law , 2010 .

[3]  S. Verhulst,et al.  Regulating the changing media : a comparative study , 1998 .

[4]  Jeni Simpson,et al.  Inclusive Information and Communication Technologies for People with Disabilities , 2009 .

[5]  Peter Gregor,et al.  Cognitive difficulties and access to information systems: an interaction design perspective , 2005, ASAC.

[6]  A. Lawson.  Disability and Employment in the Equality Act 2010: Opportunities Seized, Lost and Generated , 2011 .

[7]  T. Shakespeare,et al.  Disability Rights and Wrongs , 2009 .

[8]  Bob Hepple,et al.  Equality: The New Legal Framework , 2011 .

[9]  T. Bingham.  “There is a World Elsewhere”: The Changing Perspectives of English Law , 1992, International and Comparative Law Quarterly.

[10]  Paul Craig,et al.  EU Law: Text, Cases and Materials , 1998 .

[11]  A. Abrar,et al.  From Madness to Method: The Americans with Disabilities Act Meets the Internet , 2008 .

[12]  Isabel Arana DuPree.  Websites as Places of Public Accommodation: Amending the Americans with Disabilities Act in the Wake of National Federation of the Blind v. Target Corporation , 2007 .

[13]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Telecommunications policy and individuals with disabilities: Issues of accessibility and social inclusion in the policy and research agenda , 2006 .

[14]  Tom Harkin.  The Americans with Disabilities Act Ten Years Later: A Framework for the Future , 2003 .

[15]  M. Bulmer,et al.  Citizenship Today: The Contemporary Relevance Of T.H. Marshall , 1996 .

[16]  Liberalization and Democratization: The Forum and the Hearth in the Era of Cosmopolitan Post-Industrial Capitalism , 2000 .

[17]  Jean Campbell.  Unintended Consequences in Public Policy: Persons with Psychiatric Disabilities and the Americans with Disabilities Act , 1994 .

[18]  T. Burchardt.  Capabilities and disability: the capabilities framework and the social model of disability , 2004 .

[19]  Peter Gregor,et al.  Digital switchover or digital divide: a prognosis for usable and accessible interactive digital television in the UK , 2006, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[20]  Daniel P. Graham.  Public Interest Regulation in the Digital Age , 2003 .

[21]  D. Schiek.  The ECJ decision in Mangold: A further twist on effects of directives and constitutional relevance of community equality legislation , 2006 .

[22]  Mira Burri-Nenoca.  The New Concept of Universal Service in a Digital Networked Communications Environment , 2007 .

[23]  R. Colker.  When is Separate Unequal?: A Disability Perspective , 2008 .

[24]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society , 1989 .

[25]  James Ming Chen.  From Red Lion to Red List: The Dominance and Decline of the Broadcast Medium , 2008 .

[26]  Alicia R. Ouellette.  Bioethics and Disability: Toward a Disability-Conscious Bioethics , 2011 .

[27]  C. Cherry,et al.  The age of access , 1985 .

[28]  Peter Gregor,et al.  Cognitive and learning difficulties and how they affect access to IT systems , 2007, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[29]  Anna Lawson,et al.  Disability and Equality Law in Britain: The Role of Reasonable Adjustment , 2008 .

[30]  S. Butlin.  The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Does the Equality Act 2010 Measure up to UK International Commitments? , 2011 .

[31]  P. Hägg.  Theories on the Economics of Regulation: A Survey of the Literature from a European Perspective , 1997 .

[32]  Helen Meenan,et al.  Equality law in an enlarged European Union: understanding the Article 13 directives , 2007 .

[33]  W. J. Kamba,et al.  Comparative Law: A Theoretical Framework , 1974, International and Comparative Law Quarterly.

[34]  Denise G. Reaume,et al.  Discrimination and Dignity , 2004 .

[35]  D. Baker.  Issue definition in rights‐based policy focused on the experiences of individuals with disabilities: an examination of Canadian parliamentary discourse , 2008 .

[36]  Oliver Lewis,et al.  United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities , 2007, International Legal Materials.

[37]  John Keane,et al.  The Media and Democracy , 1991 .

[38]  S. Fredman.  Equality: A New Generation? , 2001 .

[39]  S. Picciotto.  Introduction: Reconceptualizing Regulation in the Era of Globalization , 2002, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[40]  M. Cave,et al.  Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice , 1999 .

[41]  Mike Feintuck,et al.  Media Regulation, Public Interest and the Law , 2006 .

[42]  L. Tshuma.  Hierarchies and Government Versus Networks and Governance: Competing Regulatory Paradigms in Global Economic Regulation , 2000 .

[43]  Jennifer L. Gregg.  Policy‐making in the public interest: a contextual analysis of the passage of closed‐captioning policy , 2006 .

[44]  N. Helberger.  Access to Technical Bottleneck Facilities: The New European Approach , 2002 .

[45]  Shani Else.  Courts Must Welcome the Reality of the Modem World: Cyberspace Is a PlaceUnder Title III of the Americanswith Disabilities Act , 2008 .

[46]  David A. L. Levy.  The regulation of digital conditional access systems. A case study in European policy making , 1997 .

[47]  C. Barnes,et al.  The New Politics of Disablement , 2012 .

[48]  Clayton Lewis.  Simplicity in cognitive assistive technology: a framework and agenda for research , 2006, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[49]  M. Feintuck.  Walking the High-Wire: The UK's Draft Communications Bill , 2003, European Public Law.

[50]  Uta Kohl,et al.  Jurisdiction and the Internet: Regulatory Competence over Online Activity , 2007 .

[51]  Lauren French LaRochelle.  Dollars and Sense: Designing a Reasonable Accommodation Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act , 2008 .

[52]  T. Prosser.  The Limits of Competition Law: Markets and Public Services , 2005 .

[53]  C. Barnes.  Disability Rights: rhetoric and reality in the UK , 1995 .

[54]  O. D. Schutter.  Europe in Search of Its Civil Society , 2002 .

[55]  A. Beckett.  Citizenship and Vulnerability: Disability and Issues of Social and Political Engagement , 2006 .

[56]  C. Atkins.  A Cripple at a Rich Man's Gate: A Comparison of Disability, Employment and Anti-discrimination Law in the United States and Canada , 2006, Canadian journal of law and society.

[57]  A. Rimmerman.  Social Inclusion of People with Disabilities: National and International Perspectives , 2012 .

[58]  T. H. Marshall,et al.  Citizenship and Social Class: And Other Essays. , 1951 .

[59]  Liz Johnson,et al.  In Whose Service? Technology, Care and Disabled People: The case for a disability politics perspective , 1998 .

[60]  Francis McGowan,et al.  Towards a European regulatory state , 1996 .

[61]  Sandra Fredman,et al.  Human Rights Transformed: Positive Rights and Positive Duties , 2008 .

[62]  C. Crouch,et al.  Citizenship, markets, and the state , 2001 .

[63]  Michael Oliver,et al.  Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice , 1995 .

[64]  M. Raboy,et al.  Cultural Development and the Open Economy: A Democratic Issue and a Challenge to Public Policy , 1994 .

[65]  R. McChesney.  Global Media, Neoliberalism, and Imperialism , 2001 .

[66]  Robert W. McChesney,et al.  Theses on media deregulation , 2003 .

[67]  P. Vincent-Jones,et al.  Law, Economic Incentives and Public Service Culture , 2005 .

[68]  Gerard Goggin,et al.  Digital Disability: The Social Construction of Disability in New Media , 2002 .

[69]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Internet Access and Use in Context , 2004, New Media Soc..

[70]  John Matthew Williamson.  Rights Management in Digital Media Content: A Case for FCC Intervention in the Standardization Process , 2005, J. Telecommun. High Technol. Law.

[71]  J. Shaw.  The Interpretation of European Union Citizenship , 2003 .

[72]  Bob Sapey.  Disablement in the Informational Age , 2000 .

[73]  Robert W. McChesney,et al.  The global media : the new missionaries of corporate capitalism , 1997 .

[74]  April D'Aubin,et al.  Working for Barrier Removal in the ICT Area: Creating a More Accessible and Inclusive Canada , 2007, Inf. Soc..

[75]  S. Fredman.  The Public Sector Equality Duty , 2011 .

[76]  With Freedom Comes Responsibility: Ensuring That the Next Generation of Technologies is Accessible, Usable and Affordable , 2001 .

[77]  U. Haltern.  Pathos and Patina: The Failure and Promise of Constitutionalism in the European Imagination , 2003 .

[78]  U. Hammer.  EC Secondary Legislation of Network Markets and Public Service: An Economic and Functional Approach , 2002 .

[79]  G. Quinn.  The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Toward a New International Politics of Disability , 2009 .

[80]  Neil Weinstock Netanel,et al.  Cyberspace Self-Governance: A Skeptical View from Liberal Democratic Theory , 2000 .

[81]  Turgut Ayhan Beydogan.  Interoperability-Centric Problems: New Challenges and Legal Solutions , 2010, Int. J. Law Inf. Technol..

[82]  Konrad Zweigert,et al.  Introduction to comparative law , 1993 .

[83]  Bally Thun.  Disability Rights Frameworks in Canada , 2007 .

[84]  Caroline Gooding,et al.  Disabling Laws, Enabling Acts: Disability Rights in Britain and America , 1994 .

[85]  Anthony E. Varona.  Out of Thin Air: Using First Amendment Public Forum Analysis to Redeem American Broadcasting Regulation , 2006 .

[86]  M. Lister.  ‘Marshall-ing’ Social and Political Citizenship: Towards a Unified Conception of Citizenship 1 , 2005, Government and Opposition.

[87]  Michael Hantke-Domas.  The Public Interest Theory of Regulation: Non-Existence or Misinterpretation? , 2003 .

[88]  M. Feintuck.  'The Public Interest' in Regulation , 2005 .

[89]  L. Vanhala.  Making Rights a Reality?: Disability Rights Activists and Legal Mobilization , 2014 .

[90]  Mike Feintuck.  Regulating the Media Revolution: In Search of the Public Interest , 1997, Journal of Information, Law and Technology.

[91]  David A. L. Levy.  Europe's Digital Revolution: Broadcasting Regulation, the EU and the Nation State , 1999 .

[92]  Deborah Stienstra,et al.  Engaging Citizens with Disabilities in eDemocracy , 2005 .

[93]  Christopher Newell,et al.  The Business of Digital Disability , 2007, Inf. Soc..

[94]  C. Barnes,et al.  Equal Rights for Disabled People: The Case for a New Law , 1991 .

[95]  Anthony Tusler,et al.  How to Make Technology Work: A Study of Best Practices in United States Electronic and Information Technology Companies , 2005 .

[96]  L. Bygrave,et al.  Internet governance : infrastructure and institutions , 2009 .

[97]  Charlotte O’brien.  Equalitys False Summits: New Varieties of Disability Discrimination, Excessive Equal Treatment and Economically Constricted Horizons , 2011 .

[98]  S. Arai,et al.  Role of Canadian user‐led disability organizations in the non‐profit sector , 2007 .

[99]  D. Oliver,et al.  Human Rights and the Private Sphere: A Comparative Study , 2007 .

[100]  Perri.  Ownership and the New Politics of the Public Interest Services , 1998 .

[101]  Evelyn Ellis,et al.  EU Anti-Discrimination Law , 2005 .

[102]  Catherine Easton.  Revisiting the law on website accessibility in the light of the UK's Equality Act 2010 and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities , 2012, Int. J. Law Inf. Technol..

[103]  Pierre Larouche.  EC competition law and the convergence of the telecommunications and broadcasting sectors , 1998 .

[104]  I. Karpin,et al.  Perfecting Pregnancy: Law, Disability, and the Future of Reproduction , 2012 .

[105]  E. Hargittai,et al.  The disability divide in internet access and use , 2006 .

[106]  James Watzke,et al.  A Three-Way Dance: The Global Public Good and Accessibility in Information Technologies , 2007, Inf. Soc..

[107]  Jean-Michel Glachant,et al.  Why Regulate Deregulated Network Industries? , 2002 .

[108]  C. Sunstein.  After the Rights Revolution: Reconceiving the Regulatory State , 1991 .

[109]  R. McChesney.  Rich media, poor democracy : communication politics in dubious times , 2000 .

[110]  Sara J. Czaja,et al.  The impact of aging on access to technology , 2005, ASAC.

[111]  Tomoko Kanayama.  Leaving It Up to the Industry: People With Disabilities and the Telecommunications Act of 1996 , 2003, Inf. Soc..

[112]  Anthony B. Robinson,et al.  Blackstone's Guide to the Equality Act 2010 , 2010 .

[113]  Eliza Varney.  Regulating the Digital Television Infrastructure in the EU - Room for Citizenship Interests? , 2006 .

[114]  A. Estella.  Constitutional Legitimacy and Credible Commitments in the European Union , 2005 .

[115]  E. Grabham.  Law v Canada: New Directions for Equality Under the Canadian Charter? , 2008 .

[116]  S. Baer.  Dignity, liberty, equality: A fundamental rights triangle of constitutionalism , 2009 .

[117]  A. Chadwick.  Internet Politics: States, Citizens, and New Communication Technologies , 2006 .

[118]  D. Hosking.  A High Bar for EU Disability Rights , 2007 .

[119]  Kenneth A. Armstrong,et al.  Rediscovering Civil Society: The European Union and the White Paper on Governance , 2002 .

[120]  D. Freedman.  The politics of media policy , 2008 .

[121]  Evgenia Fkiaras.  [2ShidlerJLComTech006] Liability Under the Americans with Disabilities Act for Private Web Site Operators , 2005 .

[122]  G. Quinn,et al.  The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities : European and Scandinavian perspectives , 2009 .

[123]  Eliza Varney.  A hierarchy of disability rights? A comparative examination of the regulation of digital television in the United States of America and the United Kingdom , 2009 .

[124]  F. Bowe.  Access to the Information Age: Fundamental Decisions in Telecommunications Policy , 1993 .

[125]  Virginia Held.  The public interest and individual interests , 1970 .

[126]  Rory O’Connell.  The Role of Dignity in Equality Law: Lessons from Canada and South Africa , 2008 .

[127]  Mark Bell,et al.  Anti-Discrimination Law and the European Union , 2002 .

[128]  Alan Brouder,et al.  Handbook of transnational economic governance regimes , 2009 .

[129]  A. Silvers,et al.  Americans with disabilities : exploring implications of the law for individuals and institutions , 2000 .

[130]  Competition Law and Pluralism in European Digital Broadcasting: Addressing the Gaps , 2004 .

[131]  Christopher Newell,et al.  An End to Disabling Policies? Toward Enlightened Universal Service , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[132]  D. Thornburgh,et al.  Race, Ethnicity, and Disability: Veterans and Benefits in Post-Civil War America , 2013 .

[133]  Shared Values, Networks, and Trust among Canadian Consumer-Driven Disability Organizations , 2008 .

[134]  A. Cureton,et al.  Disability and disadvantage , 2009 .

[135]  John Braithwaite,et al.  Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate , 1992 .

[136]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  Television and the Public Interest , 2000 .

[137]  Rosemary Kayess,et al.  Out of Darkness into Light? Introducing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities , 2008 .

[138]  A. Dhanda.  Constructing a new Human Rights lexicon: Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities , 2008 .

[139]  D. Schiek,et al.  European Union Non-Discrimination Law and Intersectionality , 2011 .

[140]  Frank I. Michelman,et al.  Between Facts and Norms , 1992 .

[141]  J. Peterson.  Subsidiarity: A definition to suit any vision? , 1994 .

[142]  Paul Nihoul,et al.  EU Electronic Communications Law: Competition and Regulation in the European Telecommunications Market , 2004 .

[143]  J. Fossum,et al.  Democracy Through Strong Publics in the European Union? , 2002 .

[144]  Dermot Nolan.  Bottlenecks in pay television. Impact on market development in Europe , 1997 .

[145]  Scott McCoy,et al.  Information technology systems accessibility , 2006, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[146]  Eilionóir Flynn.  From Rhetoric to Action: Achieving Ireland???s National Disability Strategy ??? A Case Study in Implementation and Monitoring at the Domestic Level , 2011 .

[147]  Mike Kent,et al.  Disability and new media , 2011 .

[148]  Jim Chen,et al.  Subsidized Rural Telephony and the Public Interest: A Case Study In Cooperative Federalism and its Pitfalls , 2006, J. Telecommun. High Technol. Law.

[149]  Mark Bell,et al.  More Equal than Others: Distinguishing European Union Equality Directives , 2001, Common Market Law Review.

[150]  A. Satz.  Disability, Vulnerability, and the Limits of Antidiscrimination , 2008 .

[151]  Aart Hendriks,et al.  UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. , 2007, European journal of health law.

[152]  J. Lichtenberg,et al.  Democracy and the Mass Media , 1992 .

[153]  Leena Eronen,et al.  Five qualitative research methods to make iTV applications universally accessible , 2006, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[154]  Erwin G. Krasnow,et al.  The "Public Interest" Standard: The Search for the Holy Grail , 1998 .

[155]  Mark Deal,et al.  Disabled people's attitudes toward other impairment groups: a hierarchy of impairments , 2003 .

[156]  Martin Schrepp.  On the efficiency of keyboard navigation in Web sites , 2006, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[157]  J. Nelson.  The Disabled, the media, and the information age , 1994 .