Exploratory study of MOOC learners’ demographics and motivation: The case of students involved in groups

This paper reports preliminary findings on students enrolled in a massive open online course, who were also assigned to work in groups. Part of a larger study on the effect of groups on retention and completion in MOOCs, the paper provides students’ demographics (i.e., location, gender, education level, and employment status), and motivation for taking the course. Findings show that women outnumbered men and that students mostly enrolled into the course because of a friend. Indeed, research on MOOCs demonstrates that men outnumber women and that educational pursuit and professional development are the main motivators for taking MOOCs. Yet, this paper shows that when group work is included in a MOOC, women participate more. Furthermore, for students assigned to groups in a MOOC, friends are the principal incentive for enrolling into the course. These results are discussed in light of previous research, and implications for teaching and learning in online environments addressed.

[1]  David Kember,et al.  Characterising a teaching and learning environment conducive to making demands on students while not making their workload excessive , 2006 .

[2]  Jeff Haywood,et al.  DIFFERENCES IN ONLINE STUDY BEHAVIOUR BETWEEN SUB-POPULATIONS OF MOOC LEARNERS (DIFERENCIAS DE COMPORTAMIENTO ENTRE GRUPOS DE ESTUDIANTES DE CURSOS EN LÍNEA ABIERTOS Y MASIVOS (MOOC)) , 2015 .

[3]  Meng Wang,et al.  “Bioinformatics: Introduction and Methods,” a Bilingual Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) as a New Example for Global Bioinformatics Education , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  Guillaume Zufferey,et al.  Watching MOOCs together: investigating co-located MOOC study groups , 2014 .

[5]  Doug Clow,et al.  MOOCs and the funnel of participation , 2013, LAK '13.

[6]  Diane Hui,et al.  Gender differences in collaborative learning over online social networks: Epistemological beliefs and behaviors , 2013 .

[7]  Rachel Brooks.  Young People's Higher Education Choices: The role of family and friends , 2003 .

[8]  Gayle S. Christensen,et al.  The MOOC Phenomenon: Who Takes Massive Open Online Courses and Why? , 2013 .

[9]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Model thinking: demographics and performance of mooc students unable to afford a formal education , 2014, L@S.

[10]  Jeremy J. Ramsden,et al.  Bioinformatics: An Introduction , 2004, Computational Biology.

[11]  D. Kember,et al.  Characterising a teaching and learning environment capable of motivating student learning , 2010 .

[12]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Democratizing Higher Education: Exploring MOOC Use Among Those Who Cannot Afford a Formal Education , 2014 .

[13]  Jeff Haywood,et al.  Emerging patterns in MOOCs: Learners, course designs and directions , 2015 .

[14]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Talkabout: Making Distance Matter with Small Groups in Massive Classes , 2015, CSCW.

[15]  Bernardo A. León de la Barra,et al.  Attracting girls to science, engineering and technology: an Australian perspective , 2009 .

[16]  Alexandria Walton Radford,et al.  MOOCs: Not Just for College Students—How Organizations Can Use MOOCs for Professional Development , 2015 .

[17]  Richard D. Johnson,et al.  Gender Differences in E-Learning: Communication, Social Presence, and Learning Outcomes , 2011, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[18]  Katharina Reinecke,et al.  Demographic differences in how students navigate through MOOCs , 2014, L@S.

[19]  Hugh C. Davis,et al.  MOOCs for Universities and Learners - An Analysis of Motivating Factors , 2014, CSEDU.

[20]  S. Alvarado,et al.  College-bound friends and college application choices: Heterogeneous effects for Latino and White students. , 2012, Social science research.

[21]  Kathryn Weed Jablokow,et al.  A Multidisciplinary MOOC on Creativity, Innovation, and Change: Encour- aging Experimentation and Experiential Learning on a Grand Scale , 2014 .

[22]  Yan Liu,et al.  Motivations and Challenges in MOOCs with Eastern Insights , 2016 .

[23]  C. Stokes,et al.  Discover Dentistry: encouraging wider participation in dentistry using a massive open online course (MOOC) , 2015, BDJ.

[24]  Timothy C. Johnston.  Who And What Influences Choice Of University? Student And University Perceptions. , 2010 .

[25]  Steve Cooper,et al.  Reflections on Stanford's MOOCs , 2013, CACM.

[26]  Yvonne Belanger,et al.  Bioelectricity: A Quantitative Approach Duke University’s First MOOC , 2013 .

[27]  Ray-I Chang,et al.  Survey of learning experiences and influence of learning style preferences on user intentions regarding MOOCs , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[28]  Yoram M. Kalman,et al.  A race to the bottom: MOOCs and higher education business models , 2014 .

[29]  Carlos Turro,et al.  Analysis of demographics and results of student's opinion survey of a large scale mooc deployment for the spanish speaking community , 2014, 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings.