The Use of Atomic Force Microscopy to Evaluate Warm Mix Asphalt

The main objective of this study was to use the Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) to examine the moisture susceptibility and healing characteristics of Warm Mix Asphalt (WMA) and compare it with those of conventional Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA). To this end, different AFM techniques such as the tapping mode imaging and force spectroscopy experiments were conducted on two types of asphalt binders produced using various WMA technologies as well as a conventional HMA. The considered WMA technologies included: Advera, Evotherm M1, Sasobit, and foamed WMA. Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR) tests were conducted on the evaluated binders, and AASHTO T283 test was performed on mixtures prepared using those binders. The results of the AFM imaging showed that while the Sasobit additive has reduced the dimensions of the so called ‘bee-like’ structures within the neat and polymer modified asphalt binders, the other WMA technologies did not have any significant effect on these structures. In addition, the Sasobit resulted in increasing the relative stiffness of dispersed domains containing the ‘bee-like’ structure in comparison with the flat asphalt matrix for both types of binders, which explained the higher shear modulus values obtained in the DSR test for binders with this WMA additive. The results of the AFM force spectroscopy experiments indicated that all WMA technologies resulted in increasing the nano-scale adhesive forces for both types of asphalt binders prior to moisture conditioning. Advera and foamed WMA had the highest improvement to these forces, while the Sasobit had the least. This might be the cause for the lower indirect tensile strength value that was obtained for the Sasobit mixtures in comparison to other WMA mixtures. The AFM results also showed that the adhesive forces were significantly reduced due to moisture conditioning of the control and WMA 64-22 binders. However, the control and Evotherm WMA binders exhibited the least reduction, while the Advera WMA binder had the highest decrease, which may have contributed to reducing the tensile strength ratio values of the Advera 64-22 mixture. The Sasobit and Advera was also found to reduce the nano-scale cohesive forces within the considered asphalt binders upon moisture conditioning, indicating that it might adversely affect the cohesive bonds within the asphalt binder. The results of the AFM force spectroscopy experiments also suggested that the AASHTO T283 test results primarily depend on the adhesive forces between the aggregate and the binder. The AFM healing experiments indicated that all WMA technologies except the Sasobit resulted in improving the micro-crack closure rate in both types of asphalt binders considered in this study. In addition, only the Sasobit resulted in significant decrease in the cohesive bonding energy; indicating that it might adversely affect the intrinsic healing of the considered asphalt binders. On the contrary, the other WMA technologies improved the –OH cohesive bonding energy and did not significantly influence the –COOH cohesive bonding energy for both asphalt binders. Finally, the results of this study indicated that the AFM is a viable device to study the moisture damage and healing phenomena in asphalt materials.

[1]  L. Carbognani,et al.  STUDIES ON LARGE CRUDE OIL ALKANES. II. ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF AROMATIC WAXES AND WAXY ASPHALTENES. , 2000 .

[2]  Brian D Prowell,et al.  Evaluation of Aspha-Min® Zeolite for Use in Warm Mix Asphalt , 2005 .

[3]  Brian D Prowell,et al.  Evaluation of Sasobit® for Use in Warm Mix Asphalt , 2005 .

[4]  Shaopeng Wu,et al.  Influence of aging on the evolution of structure, morphology and rheology of base and SBS modified bitumen , 2009 .

[5]  S Maccarrone,et al.  Cold asphalt systems as an alternative to hotmix , 1995 .

[6]  KJ Jenkins,et al.  HALF-WARM FOAMED BITUMEN TREATMENT , A NEW PROCESS , .

[7]  Graham C Hurley,et al.  Evaluation of Potential Processes for Use in Warm Mix Asphalt (With Discussion) , 2006 .

[8]  J Claine Petersen,et al.  Chemical composition of asphalt as related to asphalt durability , 1984 .

[9]  Savas Kaya,et al.  Evaluation of WMA Healing Properties Using Atomic Force Microscopy , 2012 .

[10]  Samuel H Carpenter,et al.  Aggregate Blending for Asphalt Mix Design: Bailey Method , 2002 .

[11]  Ashley Buss,et al.  Investigation of Warm-Mix Asphalt Using Iowa Aggregates , 2011 .

[13]  O. Kristjansdottir,et al.  Warm Mix Asphalt for Cold Weather Paving , 2006 .

[14]  J K Davidson Warm asphalt mix technology: the Canadian perspective , 2007 .

[15]  François Olard,et al.  Low-Energy Asphalt with Performance of Hot-Mix Asphalt , 2006 .

[16]  P J Ruckel,et al.  FOAMED-ASPHALT PAVING MIXTURES: PREPARATION OF DESIGN MIXES AND TREATMENT OF TEST SPECIMENS , 1983 .

[17]  Adam J. T. Hand,et al.  Laboratory and Field Evaluations of Foamed Warm-Mix Asphalt Projects , 2009 .

[18]  Larry Michael,et al.  Assessing Potential for Warm-Mix Asphalt Technology Adoption , 2007 .

[19]  A. Karim,et al.  Mapping Chemical Heterogeneity of Polymeric Materials with Chemical Force Microscopy , 2004 .

[20]  Rafiqul A. Tarefder,et al.  Nanoscale Evaluation of Moisture Damage in Polymer Modified Asphalts , 2010 .

[21]  E. Masad,et al.  Physically Based Model for Predicting the Susceptibility of Asphalt Pavements to Moisture-Induced Damage , 2010 .

[22]  L. Loeber,et al.  Bitumen in colloid science: a chemical, structural and rheological approach , 1998 .

[23]  M. Huggins Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers. , 1961 .

[24]  Amit Bhasin,et al.  Development of methods to quantify bitumen-aggregate adhesion and loss of adhesion due to water , 2007 .

[25]  Andrea Kvasnak,et al.  EVALUATION OF GENCOR GREEN MACHINE ULTRAFOAM GX: FINAL REPORT , 2010 .

[26]  F L Roberts,et al.  Stripping in HMA Mixtures: State-of-the-Art and Critical Review of Test Methods , 1988 .

[27]  Yongjoo Kim,et al.  Experiences of Developing and Validating a New Mix Design Procedure for Cold In-Place Recycling Using Foamed Asphalt , 2007 .

[28]  Rebecca S McDaniel,et al.  Asphalt Mixture Innovations: State of the Practice and Vision for 2020 and Beyond , 2007 .

[29]  Brian D Prowell,et al.  Warm-Mix Asphalt: European Practice , 2008 .

[30]  B G Koenders,et al.  INNOVATIVE PROCESS IN ASPHALT PRODUCTION AND APPLICATION TO OBTAIN LOWER OPERATING TEMPERATURES , 2000 .

[31]  Hussain U Bahia,et al.  Laboratory Study on Warm-Mix Asphalt Additives , 2007 .

[32]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Phase contrast imaging of nanocomposites and molecularly thick lubricant films in magnetic media , 2003 .

[33]  Brian D Prowell,et al.  Evaluation of Evotherm® for use in Warm Mix Asphalt , 2006 .

[34]  Ladis H Csanyi,et al.  FOAMED ASPHALT IN BITUMINOUS PAVING MIXTURES , 1957 .

[35]  A. C. Fischer-Cripps,et al.  Critical review of analysis and interpretation of nanoindentation test data , 2006 .

[36]  M. Witczak,et al.  STRESS DEPENDENT MASTER CURVE CONSTRUCTION FOR DYNAMIC (COMPLEX) MODULUS (WITH DISCUSSION) , 2002 .

[37]  Musharraf Zaman,et al.  Comparative Laboratory Study of Sasobit and Aspha-Min Additives in Warm-Mix Asphalt , 2007 .

[38]  Brian D Prowell,et al.  Field Performance of Warm-Mix Asphalt at National Center for Asphalt Technology Test Track , 2007 .

[39]  Ramon Bonaquist,et al.  Mix Design Practices for Warm Mix Asphalt , 2011 .

[40]  J. Masson,et al.  Bitumen morphologies by phase‐detection atomic force microscopy , 2006, Journal of microscopy.

[41]  R. E. Link,et al.  Evaluation of Warm Mix Asphalt Mixtures Containing RAP Using Accelerated Loading Tests , 2011 .

[43]  Wayne Hodo Field and Laboratory Investigation of Foamed Asphalt (Warm-Mix Asphalt) with High Recycled Asphalt Pavement Content for Sustainment and Rehabilitation of Asphalt Pavement , 2009 .

[44]  Randy C West,et al.  Case Study of Warm-Mix Asphalt Moisture Susceptibility in Birmingham, Alabama , 2009 .

[45]  H. Zhang,et al.  Effect of aging on morphology of organo‐montmorillonite modified bitumen by atomic force microscopy , 2011, Journal of microscopy.

[46]  B Middleton,et al.  Evaluation of Warm-Mix Asphalt Produced with the Double Barrel Green Process , 2008 .

[47]  S. Caro,et al.  Moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixtures, Part 1: mechanisms , 2008 .

[48]  Bradley J. Putman,et al.  Evaluation of Rutting Resistance in Warm-Mix Asphalts Containing Moist Aggregate , 2010 .

[49]  Robert L. Lytton,et al.  Limits on Adhesive Bond Energy for Improved Resistance of Hot-Mix Asphalt to Moisture Damage , 2006 .