Social media and political communication in the 2014 elections to the European Parliament

Social media play an increasingly important part in the communication strategies of political campaigns by reflecting information about the policy preferences and opinions of political actors and their public followers. In addition, the content of the messages provides rich information about the political issues and the framing of those issues during elections, such as whether contested issues concern Europe or rather extend pre-existing national debates. In this study, we survey the European landscape of social media using tweets originating from and referring to political actors during the 2014 European Parliament election campaign. We describe the language and national distribution of the messages, the relative volume of different types of communications, and the factors that determine the adoption and use of social media by the candidates. We also analyze the dynamics of the volume and content of the communications over the duration of the campaign with reference to both the EU integration dimension of the debate and the prominence of the most visible list-leading candidates. Our findings indicate that the lead candidates and their televised debate had a prominent influence on the volume and content of communications, and that the content and emotional tone of communications more reflects preferences along the EU dimension of political contestation rather than classic national issues relating to left-right differences.

[1]  C. Welzel,et al.  The Civic Culture Transformed: From Allegiant To Assertive Citizens , 2015 .

[2]  S. Hobolt,et al.  When dimensions collide: The electoral success of issue entrepreneurs , 2012 .

[3]  Robert Rohrschneider,et al.  Polarizing without legitimizing: The effect of lead candidates’ campaigns on perceptions of the EU democracy , 2016 .

[4]  Pablo Barberá.  Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data , 2015, Political Analysis.

[5]  Caitlin Evans Wagner,et al.  The hybrid media system: Politics and power , 2014, New Media Soc..

[6]  Andreas Jungherr.  Twitter in Politics: A Comprehensive Literature Review , 2014 .

[7]  J. Lees-Marshment.  Political Marketing and British Political Parties: The Party's Just Begun , 2002 .

[8]  Andreas Jungherr.  The Role of the Internet in Political Campaigns in Germany , 2015 .

[9]  S. Hobolt,et al.  Democratic Politics in a European Union Under Stress , 2014 .

[10]  James W. Pennebaker,et al.  Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC2007) , 2007 .

[11]  Jan Rovny.  Who emphasizes and who blurs? Party strategies in multidimensional competition , 2012 .

[12]  W. Grant,et al.  Digital Dialogue? Australian Politicians' use of the Social Network Tool Twitter , 2010 .

[13]  L. Hooghe,et al.  Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration? , 2002 .

[14]  Pablo Barberá,et al.  A Bad Workman Blames His Tweets? The Consequences of Citizens’ Uncivil Twitter Use When Interacting with Party Candidates , 2016 .

[15]  Kim Strandberg,et al.  A social media revolution or just a case of history repeating itself? The use of social media in the 2011 Finnish parliamentary elections , 2013, New Media Soc..

[16]  H. Schmitt,et al.  NINE SECOND‐ORDER NATIONAL ELECTIONS – A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE ANALYSIS OF EUROPEAN ELECTION RESULTS , 1980 .

[17]  S. Hobolt,et al.  Issue Entrepreneurship and Multiparty Competition , 2015 .

[18]  S. Hix,et al.  Punishment or Protest? Understanding European Parliament Elections , 2007, The Journal of Politics.

[19]  Hermann Schmitt,et al.  Does personalization increase turnout? Spitzenkandidaten in the 2014 European Parliament elections , 2015 .

[20]  Brendan T. O'Connor,et al.  Computational Text Analysis for Social Science: Model Assumptions and Complexity , 2011 .

[21]  H. Schmitt.  The European Parliament Elections of June 2004: Still Second-Order? , 2005 .

[22]  A. Larsson.  The EU Parliament on Twitter—Assessing the Permanent Online Practices of Parliamentarians , 2015 .

[23]  C. Eijk,et al.  Choosing Europe?: The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union , 1996 .

[24]  R. Gibson,et al.  Party change, social media and the rise of ‘citizen-initiated’ campaigning , 2015 .

[25]  Eva Johanna Schweitzer,et al.  Informing, engaging, mobilizing or interacting: Searching for a European model of web campaigning , 2011 .

[26]  M. Castells.  Communication Power: Mass Communication, Mass Self-Communication and Power Relationships in the Network Society , 2009, Media and Society.

[27]  Kenneth Benoit,et al.  The dimensionality of political space: Epistemological and methodological considerations , 2012 .

[28]  Yannis Theocharis,et al.  A Bad Workman Blames His Tweets? The Consequences of Citizens’ Uncivil Twitter Use When Interacting with Party Candidates , 2016 .

[29]  K. Benoit,et al.  Party Groups and Policy Positions in the European Parliament , 2005 .

[30]  Marianne van de Steeg.  The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political Contention , 2012 .

[31]  National but European? Visual manifestations of Europe in national parties’ Euromanifestos since 1979 , 2017 .

[32]  H. Zou,et al.  Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net , 2005 .

[33]  Загоровская Ольга Владимировна,et al.  Исследование влияния пола и психологических характеристик автора на количественные параметры его текста с использованием программы Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count , 2015 .

[34]  Matthew Zook,et al.  Beyond the geotag: situating ‘big data’ and leveraging the potential of the geoweb , 2013 .

[35]  Heather K. Evans,et al.  Twitter Style: An Analysis of How House Candidates Used Twitter in Their 2012 Campaigns , 2014, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[36]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  Kajsa E. Dalrymple,et al.  Politics in 140 Characters or Less: Campaign Communication, Network Interaction, and Political Participation on Twitter , 2016 .

[38]  L. Hooghe,et al.  Measuring party positions in Europe , 2015 .

[39]  S. Hix,et al.  Defining the Eu Political Space , 2002 .

[40]  Politika tudományok.  The European Parliament elections , 2019, Strategic Comments.

[41]  S. Hobolt.  A vote for the President? The role of Spitzenkandidaten in the 2014 European Parliament elections , 2014 .

[42]  Pablo Barberá,et al.  Prospects of Ideological Realignment ( s ) in the 2014 EP elections ? Analyzing the Common Multidimensional Political Space for Voters , Parties , and Legislators in Europe , 2015 .

[43]  R. Koopmans,et al.  The making of a European public sphere: media discourse and political contention , 2010 .

[44]  Liesbet Hooghe,et al.  A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus , 2009, British Journal of Political Science.

[45]  Hermann Schmitt Mzes.  The European Parliament Elections of June 2004: Still Second-Order? , 2005 .

[46]  S. Hobolt,et al.  The second-order election model revisited: An experimental test of vote choices in European Parliament elections , 2011 .

[47]  Brent J. Hecht,et al.  A Tale of Cities: Urban Biases in Volunteered Geographic Information , 2014, ICWSM.

[48]  C. Eijk,et al.  European Integration and Political Conflict: Potential for contestation on European matters at national elections in Europe , 2004 .

[49]  Maurice Vergeer,et al.  Web campaigning in the 2009 European Parliament elections: A cross-national comparative analysis , 2013, New Media Soc..