Multiple Comparisons With the Best and Difference Test Statistic for Supplier Selection for Nonlinear Profiles

It is vital to choose the right supplier to reduce cost and provide high-quality products. However, a gap remains because the supplier’s process is mainly measured using qualitative and intangible criteria. Further, with technological advances, the measurement of quality characteristics is transforming through smart data sensors. With a specific time or space measurements can be done at high frequency. The functional relationships between the measures or profiles can be established. The profiles indicate the pattern in the data. The literature focused on the case when quality characteristics are described by linear profile and consider symmetric tolerance. However, in a real-world application, nonlinear profiles and asymmetric tolerance is frequently found. This study proposed multiple comparisons with the best and the difference test statistic methods to select the best suppliers when the quality characteristics are described by nonlinear profile with asymmetric tolerances. A Monte Carlo simulation study is conducted, computer programs are written in the R programming language. The result indicated in terms of rejecting inferior suppliers, the multiple comparisons with the best method perform better than the difference test statistics. With the proposed methods, managers can make decisions using a single, easy-to-understand index. Also, these methods can handle any number of suppliers. For the convenience of a decision-maker, critical values, and profile size requirements are provided. An illustrative example is included to give a better insight into the proposed methods.

[1]  Saddam Akber Abbasi,et al.  Phase II monitoring of linear profiles with random explanatory variable under Bayesian framework , 2019, Computers & Industrial Engineering.

[2]  Jeh-Nan Pan,et al.  Monitoring nonlinear profile data using support vector regression method , 2019, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[3]  Lan Kang,et al.  On-Line Monitoring When the Process Yields a Linear Profile , 2000 .

[4]  J. Shaffer Multiple Hypothesis Testing , 1995 .

[5]  Chen-ju Lin,et al.  Multiple Comparisons with the Best for Supplier Selection , 2014, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[6]  Jionghua Jin,et al.  Feature-Preserving Data Compression of Stamping Tonnage Information Using Wavelets , 1999, Technometrics.

[7]  Fu-Kwun Wang,et al.  Measuring the Process Yield for Simple Linear Profiles with one‐Sided Specification , 2014, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[8]  S. P. Wright,et al.  Comparing Curves Using Additive Models , 2002 .

[9]  Fu-Kwun Wang,et al.  Measuring Process Yield for Nonlinear Profiles , 2014, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[10]  Jing Li,et al.  Sustainable supplier selection based on SSCM practices: A rough cloud TOPSIS approach , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[11]  Samuel Kotz,et al.  An overview of theory and practice on process capability indices for quality assurance , 2009 .

[12]  Xinyang Deng,et al.  Supplier selection using AHP methodology extended by D numbers , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[13]  Mohammad Reza Akbari Jokar,et al.  Sustainable supplier selection: A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method , 2019, Journal of Manufacturing Systems.

[14]  William H. Woodall,et al.  Statistical monitoring of nonlinear product and process quality profiles , 2007, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[15]  Chien-Wei Wu,et al.  AN EFFECTIVE MODERN APPROACH FOR MEASURING HIGH-TECH PRODUCT MANUFACTURING PROCESS QUALITY , 2005 .

[16]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review , 2015 .

[17]  Fu-Kwun Wang,et al.  Supplier Selection for Multiple Linear Profiles with One‐Sided Specifications , 2016, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[18]  Tee-Chin Chang,et al.  Monitoring linearity of measurement gauges , 2006 .

[19]  Yun Yang,et al.  A Bayesian approach to sequential monitoring of nonlinear profiles using wavelets , 2019, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[20]  Kuen-Suan Chen,et al.  One‐sided capability indices CPU and CPL: decision making with sample information , 2002 .

[21]  Yi-Hua Tina Wang,et al.  Phase II monitoring and diagnosis of autocorrelated simple linear profiles , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[22]  Muhammad Riaz,et al.  Simultaneous monitoring of linear profile parameters under progressive setup , 2018, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[23]  Xiaowei Xu,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Gary W. Dickson,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF VENDOR SELECTION SYSTEMS AND DECISIONS , 1966 .

[25]  Wen Lea Pearn,et al.  Group selection for production yield among k manufacturing lines , 2011 .

[26]  Fu-Kwun Wang,et al.  Multiple Comparisons with the Best for Process Selection for Linear Profiles with One‐sided Specifications , 2016, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[27]  J. Current,et al.  A MULTIOBJECTIVE APPROACH TO VENDOR SELECTION , 1993 .

[28]  Hui-Nien Hung,et al.  An effective powerful test for one-sided supplier selection problem , 2011 .

[29]  Wen Lea Pearn,et al.  Select better suppliers based on manufacturing precision for processes with multivariate data , 2009 .

[30]  W. C. Benton,et al.  Vendor selection criteria and methods , 1991 .

[31]  Peter Schmidt,et al.  Multiple comparisons with the best, with economic applications , 2000 .

[32]  Fu-Kwun Wang,et al.  Process Selection for Linear Profiles with One‐sided Specifications Based on the Ratio Test Statistic , 2015, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[33]  Shiyu Zhou,et al.  Statistical monitoring of multiple profiles simultaneously using Gaussian processes , 2018, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[34]  Madeleine E. Pullman,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF THE SUPPLIER SELECTION PROCESS , 1998 .

[35]  Wen Lea Pearn,et al.  Supplier selection for one-sided processes with unequal sample sizes , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  Yeneneh Tamirat Negash Process Yield Index and Variable Sampling Plans for Autocorrelation Between Nonlinear Profiles , 2019, IEEE Access.

[37]  Samuel Kotz,et al.  Encyclopedia and Handbook of Process Capability Indices - A Comprehensive Exposition of Quality Control Measures , 2006, Series on Quality, Reliability and Engineering Statistics.

[38]  Babak Abbasi,et al.  Evaluation of process capability indices of linear profiles , 2012 .

[39]  D. Grau New Process Capability Indices for One-Sided Tolerances , 2009 .

[40]  Wen Lea Pearn,et al.  Group selection for processes with multiple quality characteristics , 2018 .

[41]  W. Pearn,et al.  A note on Group Selection with multiple quality characteristics: power comparison of two methods , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[42]  Wen Lea Pearn,et al.  Power analysis for group supplier selection with multiple production lines , 2018, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[43]  Shu-Kai S. Fan,et al.  Statistical monitoring of nonlinear profiles by using piecewise linear approximation , 2011 .

[44]  Chia-Huang Wu,et al.  Supplier Selection for Multiple-Characteristics Processes with One-Sided Specifications , 2013 .

[45]  Philippe Castagliola,et al.  An overview on recent profile monitoring papers (2008-2018) based on conceptual classification scheme , 2018, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[46]  Wen Lea Pearn,et al.  A Bayesian approach for group supplier selections based on the popular process-capability-index Cpk , 2016 .

[47]  Chen-ju Lin,et al.  An efficient subset selection method for supplier selection under multiple quality characteristics , 2019 .

[48]  Victor E. Kane,et al.  Process Capability Indices , 1986 .