How Analysts Think: Sense-making Strategies in the Analysis of Temporal Evolution and Criminal Network Structures and Activities

Analysis of criminal activity based on offenders’ social networks is an established procedure in intelligence analysis. The complexity of the data poses an obstacle for analysts to gauge network developments, e.g. detect emerging problems. Visualization is a powerful tool to achieve this, but it is essential to know how the analysts’ sense-making strategies can be supported most efficiently. Based on a think aloud study we identified ten cognitive strategies on a general level to be useful for designers. We also provide some examples how these strategies can be supported through appropriate visualizations.

[1]  Valerie F. Reyna,et al.  Educating Intuition , 2015, Current directions in psychological science.

[2]  Hsinchun Chen,et al.  Criminal network analysis and visualization , 2005, CACM.

[3]  Johanna Haider,et al.  Design for Intelligence Analysis of Complex Systems: Evolution of Criminal Networks , 2016, 2016 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (EISIC).

[4]  P. Pirolli,et al.  The Sensemaking Process and Leverage Points for Analyst Technology as Identified Through Cognitive Task Analysis , 2007 .

[5]  Minsuk Kahng,et al.  Scalable graph exploration and visualization: Sensemaking challenges and opportunities , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BIGCOMP).

[6]  Jean-Daniel Fekete,et al.  Small MultiPiles: Piling Time to Explore Temporal Patterns in Dynamic Networks , 2015, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[7]  Gary Klein.  Seeing What Others Don't: The Remarkable Ways We Gain Insights , 2013 .

[8]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Matrices or Node-Link Diagrams: Which Visual Representation is Better for Visualising Connectivity Models? , 2006, Inf. Vis..

[9]  Kwan-Liu Ma,et al.  Temporal Multivariate Networks , 2013, Multivariate Network Visualization.

[10]  Jean-Daniel Fekete,et al.  MatrixExplorer: a Dual-Representation System to Explore Social Networks , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[11]  Jean-Daniel Fekete,et al.  NodeTrix: a Hybrid Visualization of Social Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[12]  Bin Zhu,et al.  Visualizing social network concepts , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  Philippe Castagliola,et al.  A Comparison of the Readability of Graphs Using Node-Link and Matrix-Based Representations , 2004, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization.

[14]  Tobias Isenberg,et al.  Weighted graph comparison techniques for brain connectivity analysis , 2013, CHI.

[15]  W. Teepe,et al.  Protocol Analysis , 2012 .

[16]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[17]  Michael Burch,et al.  The State of the Art in Visualizing Dynamic Graphs , 2014, EuroVis.

[18]  Jennifer K. Phillips,et al.  A Data–Frame Theory of Sensemaking , 2007 .

[19]  Min Chen,et al.  Analyzing high-dimensional multivaríate network links with integrated anomaly detection, highlighting and exploration , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST).

[20]  Jean-Daniel Fekete,et al.  MatLink: Enhanced Matrix Visualization for Analyzing Social Networks , 2007, INTERACT.

[21]  Rick Adderley,et al.  Criminal Network Analysis inside Law Enforcement Agencies: A Data-Mining System Approach under the National Intelligence Model , 2013 .

[22]  Xi Chen,et al.  Visual Analysis of Temporal Trends in Social Networks Using Edge Color Coding and Metric Timelines , 2011, 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing.