Bulk Sediment Q p and Q s in the Mississippi Embayment , Central United States by

We have estimated P-wave and S-wave anelastic attenuation coefficients for the thick, unconsolidated sediments of the Mississippi embayment, central United States, using the spectral distance decay of explosion P and Rayleigh waves. The sediment-trapped P wave, Psed, is observed to ranges of 80 km at 10 Hz, and 1-Hz Rayleigh waves are observed out to 130 km from a 5000-lb borehole explosion in the northern part of the embayment. Rayleigh waves of 4 Hz are seen to distances of 3 km from a smaller 50-lb explosion. Analysis of the group velocity and amplitudedistance decay of both waves yields an average Qs of 100 and Qp of 200 for embayment sediments that are independent of frequency. Scatter in the Q estimates comes from interference of multiple P-wave reverberations and Rayleigh-wave modes. The attenuation model is self-consistent in that it is the same as obtained by the analysis of synthetic seismograms using the inferred Q-values. Inferred Qp and Qs values are more than three times higher than previous estimates and imply that unconsolidated sediments of the embayment do not significantly attenuate small-strain earthquake ground motions. These estimates represent a lower bound to Q of the sediments since significant scattering is observed in the waveform data that contributes to the distance decay of wave amplitude. Higher Q values also imply that the unconsolidated sediments of the embayment will form an efficient wave guide for surface waves radiated from shallow earthquakes or large earthquakes that rupture into the sediments, producing high-amplitude, long-duration wave trains that should be considered in earthquake hazard assessments.

[1]  Charles A. Langston,et al.  Seismic ground motions from a bolide shock wave , 2004 .

[2]  C. Langston Local Earthquake Wave Propagation through Mississippi Embayment Sediments, Part I: Body-Wave Phases and Local Site Responses , 2003 .

[3]  C. Langston Local Earthquake Wave Propagation through Mississippi Embayment Sediments, Part II: Influence of Local Site Velocity Structure on Qp-Qs Determinations , 2003 .

[4]  P. Bodin,et al.  Experiment in New Madrid Zone to employ active source , 2002 .

[5]  S. Pezeshk,et al.  Unexpected Values of Qs in the Unconsolidated Sediments of the Mississippi Embayment , 2002 .

[6]  Youssef M A Hashash,et al.  Non-linear one-dimensional seismic ground motion propagation in the Mississippi embayment , 2001 .

[7]  P. Bodin,et al.  Microtremor observations of deep sediment resonance in metropolitan Memphis , 2001 .

[8]  R. Catchings Regional Vp, Vs, Vp/Vs, and Poisson's ratios across earthquake source zones from Memphis, Tennessee, to St. Louis, Missouri , 1999, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[9]  P. Bodin,et al.  Broadband microtremor observation of basin resonance in the Mississippi Embayment, central US , 1999 .

[10]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  New, improved version of generic mapping tools released , 1998 .

[11]  C. Langston,et al.  Characteristics of short-period wave propagation in regions of Fennoscandia, with emphasis on Lg , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[12]  Eugene S. Schweig,et al.  THE -ENIGMA OF THE NEW MADRID EARTHQUAKES OF 1811-1812 , 1996 .

[13]  G. McMechan,et al.  Separation of intrinsic and scattering Q based on frequency-dependent amplitude ratios of transmitted waves , 1994 .

[14]  Kou‐Cheng Chen,et al.  Qp-Qs relations in the sedimentary basin of the upper Mississippi Embayment using converted phases , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[15]  Mladen Vucetic,et al.  Cyclic Threshold Shear Strains in Soils , 1994 .

[16]  R. Herrmann,et al.  Attenuation of body waves in the central New Madrid seismic zone , 1994 .

[17]  E. Woolery,et al.  Qs estimation for unconsolidated sediments using first-arrival SH wave critical refractions , 1994 .

[18]  C. Langston,et al.  QP-QS relations in a sedimentary basin using converted phases , 1991 .

[19]  Arthur Frankel,et al.  Energy-flux model of seismic coda: Separation of scattering and intrinsic attenuation , 1987 .

[20]  J. Healy,et al.  Deep Structure of Northern Mississippi Embayment , 1983 .

[21]  T. G. Barker,et al.  Shallow shear wave velocity and Q structures at the El Centro strong motion accelerograph array , 1983 .

[22]  W. Mooney,et al.  Crustal Structure of the Northern Mississippi Embayment and a Comparison with other Continental Rift Zones , 1983 .

[23]  A. Dainty A scattering model to explain seismic Q observations in the lithosphere between 1 and 30 Hz , 1981 .

[24]  R. J. Apsel Dynamic Green's functions for layered media and applications to boundary-value problems , 1979 .

[25]  John S. Farnbach The complex envelope in seismic signal analysis , 1975, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[26]  O. Nuttli,et al.  The Mississippi Valley earthquakes of 1811 and 1812: Intesities, ground motion and magnitudes , 1973, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[27]  Walter I. Futterman,et al.  Dispersive body waves , 1962 .

[28]  R. Stearns,et al.  Late Cretaceous and Subsequent Structural Development of the Northern Mississippi Embayment Area , 1962 .

[29]  R. Stearns CRETACEOUS, PALEOCENE, AND LOWER EOCENE GEOLOGIC HISTORY OF THE NORTHERN MISSISSIPPI EMBAYMENT , 1957 .

[30]  Peter Goldstein,et al.  85.5 SAC2000: Signal processing and analysis tools for seismologists and engineers , 2003 .

[31]  T. J. Owens,et al.  Regional wave propagation in Tanzania, East Africa , 2002 .

[32]  Keiiti Aki,et al.  Local Site Effects on Strong Ground Motion , 1988 .

[33]  Paul G. Richards,et al.  Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods , 1980 .