Is Eco-village and Urban Village the Future of a Degrowth Society?: An Urban Planner's Perspective

In the degrowth literature, relocalization is widely considered as a strategic approach to transition to a degrowth society, and eco-village/urban village is argued to be the spatial organization suitable for implementing localism. These debates on eco-village/urban village as a vision for long-term sustainability have profound implications for the spatial development of our society. This paper aims to challenge this proposition from an urban planner's perspective by dwelling on spatial implications and planning process. It is argued that spatial decentralization can lead to various social and environmental consequences contradicting the multi-goals of a degrowth society. Localizing and decentralizing decision making in the planning process does not necessarily lead to a just and sustainable society. Instead, it is of importance to have multi-scalar strategies in the planning context to pursue degrowth. The paper concludes by pointing out the complex relation between paradigmatic societal transformation and spatial development, and the significant role that urban planning can play in the transition to degrowth.

[1]  Eirini Kasioumi.  Sustainable Urbanism: Vision and Planning Process Through an Examination of Two Model Neighborhood Developments , 2012 .

[2]  R. Hearne.  Actually Existing Neoliberalism , 2014 .

[3]  S. Marston.  The social construction of scale , 2000 .

[4]  Eva Fraňková,et al.  Economic Localization Revisited , 2012 .

[5]  K. Ott.  Variants of de-growth and deliberative democracy: A Habermasian proposal , 2012 .

[6]  G. Kallis.  In defence of degrowth , 2011 .

[7]  N. Brenner.  Globalisation as Reterritorialisation: The Re-scaling of Urban Governance in the European Union , 1999 .

[8]  Malcolm Tait.  Urban villages as self-sufficient, integrated communities: a case study in London's Docklands , 2003 .

[9]  Jean Hillier,et al.  `Agon'izing Over Consensus: Why Habermasian Ideals cannot be `Real' , 2003 .

[10]  Petter Næss,et al.  Sustainable urban development and the multi- level transition perspective , 2012 .

[11]  Neil Brenner,et al.  Cities for people, not for profit : critical urban theory and the right to the city , 2012 .

[12]  How to rebuild democracy, re-thinking degrowth , 2012 .

[13]  N. Smith.  New Globalism, New Urbanism: Gentrification as Global Urban Strategy , 2002 .

[14]  D. Harvey.  Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution , 2012 .

[15]  J. Martínez-Alier,et al.  What is Degrowth? From an Activist Slogan to a Social Movement , 2013 .

[16]  D. Macey,et al.  Farewell to Growth , 2010 .

[17]  V. Fournier.  Escaping from the economy: the politics of degrowth , 2008 .

[18]  P. Healey.  Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory , 1992 .

[19]  Mark Purcell.  Resisting Neoliberalization: Communicative Planning or Counter-Hegemonic Movements? , 2009 .

[20]  N. Smith.  Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space , 1984 .

[21]  Tim Richardson,et al.  Exclusion: the necessary difference between ideal and practical consensus , 2004 .

[22]  M. Bonaiuti.  Growth and democracy: Trade-offs and paradoxes , 2012 .

[23]  Jeffrey Kenworthy,et al.  Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence , 1999 .

[24]  N. Brenner.  The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration , 2001 .

[25]  J. Innes.  Planning Through Consensus Building: A New View of the Comprehensive Planning Ideal , 1996 .

[26]  Karl Georg Høyer,et al.  Housing as basis for sustainable consumption , 2001 .

[27]  J. Martínez-Alier,et al.  Sustainable de-growth: Mapping the context, criticisms and future prospects of an emergent paradigm , 2010 .

[28]  M. Mayer.  Moving beyond ‘Cities for People, Not for Profit’ , 2012 .

[29]  Petter Næss,et al.  Urban form and travel behavior: experience from a Nordic context , 2012 .

[30]  M. Bonaiuti.  Degrowth: Tools for a Complex Analysis of the Multidimensional Crisis , 2012 .

[31]  J. Kovel.  The Enemy of Nature: The End of Capitalism or the End of the World? , 2002 .

[32]  J. Martínez-Alier,et al.  Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue , 2010 .

[33]  N. Brenner,et al.  Cities for people, not for profit: an introduction , 2012 .

[34]  Andrea Broaddus,et al.  Tale of Two Ecosuburbs in Freiburg, Germany , 2010 .

[35]  D. Harvey.  Social Justice and the City , 2009 .

[36]  T. Trainer.  De-growth: Do you realise what it means? § , 2012 .

[37]  N. Brenner,et al.  Cities and the Geographies of “Actually Existing Neoliberalism” , 2002 .

[38]  G. Kallis,et al.  Degrowth, Democracy and Autonomy , 2013 .

[39]  Dominic Stead,et al.  The Relationships between Urban Form and Travel Patterns. An International Review and Evaluation , 2001, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research.

[40]  P. Marcuse.  From critical urban theory to the right to the city , 2009 .

[41]  Petter Næss.  Urban Planning and Sustainable Development , 2001 .

[42]  Jin Xue.  Limits to decoupling strategies for sustainable housing development: the Hangzhou experience , 2012 .

[43]  Michael Lowy,et al.  Eco-Socialism and Democratic Planning , 2007 .

[44]  Mark Purcell,et al.  Against the local trap: scale and the study of environment and development , 2005 .

[45]  C. Zegras.  The Built Environment and Motor Vehicle Ownership and Use: Evidence from Santiago de Chile , 2010 .

[46]  H. Leitner,et al.  The political construction of scale , 1997 .

[47]  N. Smith.  4. New Globalism, New Urbanism: Gentrification as Global Urban Strategy , 2012 .

[48]  From concept to completion: A critical analysis of the urban village , 2003 .

[49]  G. Daily,et al.  Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity , 2003, Nature.

[50]  Jamie Peck.  Geographies of governance: TECs and the neo‐liberalisation of ‘local interests’ , 1998 .

[51]  M. S. Cato.  Home Economics: Planting the Seeds of a Research Agenda for the Bioregional Economy , 2011 .

[52]  M. Dijst,et al.  Travel behaviour in Dutch monocentric and policentric urban systems , 2001 .

[53]  Mark Purcell,et al.  Urban Democracy and the Local Trap , 2006 .

[54]  Takis Fotopoulos.  The Limitations of Life-style Strategies: The Ecovillage ‘Movement’ is NOT the Way Towards a New Democratic Society , 2000 .

[55]  D. Kolb,et al.  Planning in the Face of Power. , 1988 .

[56]  P. Tapio.  Towards the theory of decoupling : Degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001 , 2022 .

[57]  N. Johanisová,et al.  Economic democracy: A path for the future? , 2012 .