Flexibility and Amplification Measures in a Supply Chain Model

Flexibility in a supply chain is usually conceived as a consequence of the amplification of production, typically known as the bullwhip-effect. In this article we modeled pull, push and hybrid inventory management methods, considering an AR(1) stationary stochastic demand process. We show that for these cases, the production amplification results to be highly influenced by the flexibility policies implemented in the supply chain. In this context, we demonstrate that flexibility (measured by the adjustment capability between production and demand rates, and the ordering responsiveness) should be viewed as one of the main causes - and not a consequence - of the bullwhip effect. This is relevant for chain managers since controlling the flexibility of the chain will also let them control the amplification. We also found an analytical relation between amplification and adjustment degree, showing that the amplification acceptability constraint introduced by Muramatsu can be accomplished by controlling the flexibility dimension described before. Weak and strong flexibility conditions are proposed. We show that the weak condition ultimately does not depend on the demand autocorrelation coefficient, whilst in the strong condition the ordering responsiveness, measured by lead time, may be modulable by the adjustment degree, both in push and hybrid methods. Thus, the supply chain manager is enabled to increase or decrease the lead time just increasing or decreasing the adjustment, respectively, always satisfying the Muramatsu criteria.

[1]  Gad Rabinowitz,et al.  Sensitivity of 'Push' and 'Pull' strategies to information updating rate , 2003 .

[2]  Katsuhiko Takahashi Comparing reactive Kanban systems , 2003 .

[3]  Vineet Padmanabhan,et al.  Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect" , 1997, Manag. Sci..

[4]  J. W. Patterson,et al.  Comparison of push and pull control strategies for supply network management in a make-to-stock environment , 2004 .

[5]  Michael J. Magazine,et al.  Push and pull strategies for controlling multistage production systems , 2000 .

[6]  Dilip Chhajed,et al.  A comparative study of the performance of push and pull systems in the presence of emergency orders , 2002 .

[7]  Michael A. Zazanis,et al.  Push and Pull Production Systems: Issues and Comparisons , 1992, Oper. Res..

[8]  Roger D. H. Warburton,et al.  An Analytical Investigation of the Bullwhip Effect , 2004 .

[9]  Myreshka,et al.  The Bullwhip Effect and its Suppression in Supply Chain Management , 2004 .

[10]  S. D. Wu,et al.  Relating Demand Behavior and Production Policies in the Manufacturing Supply Chain , 1998 .

[11]  Javier Pereira,et al.  Flexibility dimensions to control the bullwhip effect in a supply chain , 2009 .

[12]  Kazuyoshi Ishii,et al.  Some ways to increase flexibility in manufacturing systems , 1985 .

[13]  Dingwei Wang,et al.  Hybrid push pull production control strategy simulation and its applications , 1997 .

[14]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  To Pull or Not to Pull: What Is the Question? , 2004, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[15]  John D. Sterman,et al.  Operational and behavioral causes of supply chain instability , 2006 .

[16]  Christopher S. Tang,et al.  The Value of Information Sharing in a Two-Level Supply Chain , 2000 .

[17]  S. Disney,et al.  On bullwhip in supply chains--historical review, present practice and expected future impact , 2006 .

[18]  Benita M. Beamon,et al.  A hybrid push/pull control algorithm for multi-stage, multi-line production systems , 2000 .

[19]  Frank Y. Chen,et al.  Quantifying the Bullwhip Effect in a Simple Supply Chain: The Impact of Forecasting, Lead Times, and Information.: The Impact of Forecasting, Lead Times, and Information. , 2000 .

[20]  Shusaku Hiraki,et al.  Flexibility of production ordering systems , 1994 .

[21]  Katsuhiko Takahashi,et al.  Push, pull, or hybrid control in supply chain management , 2004, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[22]  Javier Pereira,et al.  Flexibility in manufacturing systems: A relational and a dynamic approach , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..