Optimal Prediction of Bone Mineral Density with Ultrasonic Measurements in Excised Human Femur

Bone mineral density (BMD) measured with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) techniques is the current gold standard for osteoporotic fracture risk prediction. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) techniques in transmission measurements are, however, increasingly recognized as an alternative approach. It is feasible to select different QUS methods, one type being optimized to assess microarchitectural properties of bone structure and another to assess BMD. Broadband ultrasonic attenuation (BUA) and ultrasonic velocity (UV) measured on the proximal human femur have been shown to be both significantly correlated with BMD. However, a great diversity of algorithms has been reported to measure the time-of-flight used to derive UV values. The purpose of this study was to determine which procedure results in the optimal BMD prediction at the proximal femur from ultrasound measurements. Thirty-eight excised human femurs were measured in transmission with a pair of focused 0.5−MHz central frequency transducers. Two-dimensional scans were performed and radiofrequency (RF) signals were recorded digitally at each scan position. BUA was estimated and eight different signal processing techniques were performed to estimate UV. For each signal-processing technique UV was compared to BMD. We show that the best prediction of BMD was obtained with signal-processing techniques taking into account only the first part of the transmitted signal (r2BMD-SOS = 0.86). Moreover, we show that a linear multiple regression using both BUA and speed of sound (SOS) and applied to site-matched regions of interest improved the accuracy of BMD predictions (r2BMD-SOS/BUA = 0.95). Our results demonstrate that selecting specific signal-processing methods for QUS variables allows optimal assessment of BMD. Correlation is sufficiently high that this specific QUS method can be considered as a good surrogate of BMD.

[1]  G Van der Perre,et al.  A comparison of time-domain and frequency-domain approaches to ultrasonic velocity measurement in trabecular bone. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  K. Singer,et al.  Accuracy of lateral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for the determination of bone mineral content in the thoracic and lumbar spine: an in vitro study. , 1993, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  Martin Heller,et al.  Assessing Bone Status Beyond BMD: Evaluation of Bone Geometry and Porosity by Quantitative Ultrasound of Human Finger Phalanges , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[4]  Pascal Laugier,et al.  Prediction of frequency-dependent ultrasonic backscatter in cancellous bone using statistical weak scattering model. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  J. Truscott Quantitative ultrasound—assessment of osteoporosis and bone status , 2000 .

[6]  J.J. Kaufman,et al.  Ultrasonic assessment of human and bovine trabecular bone: a comparison study , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  R. Putz,et al.  Correlation of Femoral and Lumbar DXA and Calcaneal Ultrasound, Measured In Situ with Intact Soft Tissues, with the In Vitro Failure Loads of the Proximal Femur , 1998, Osteoporosis International.

[8]  Regular ArticleUltrasound Attenuation Imaging in the Os Calcis: An Improved Method , 1994 .

[9]  S. Ott,et al.  Accuracy of dual photon absorptiometry in excised femurs. , 1988, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  S. Cummings,et al.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures , 1993, The Lancet.

[11]  H. Genant,et al.  Comparison of an imaging heel quantitative ultrasound device (DTU-one) with densitometric and ultrasonic measurements. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[12]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Do quantitative ultrasound measurements reflect structure independently of density in human vertebral cancellous bone? , 1998, Bone.

[13]  D. Sartoris,et al.  Accuracy of dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry of the lumbar spine: cadaver study. , 1990, Radiology.

[14]  R. C. Murry,et al.  Measurement of mechanical properties of bone material in vitro by ultrasound reflection: Methodology and comparison with ultrasound transmission , 1991, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[15]  C. M. Langton,et al.  Prediction of Human Femoral Bone Strength Using Ultrasound Velocity and BMD: An In Vitro Study , 1997, Osteoporosis International.

[16]  M. Laval-jeantet,et al.  Ultrasound attenuation imaging in the os calcis: an improved method. , 1994, Ultrasonic imaging.

[17]  K. Wear,et al.  A numerical method to predict the effects of frequency-dependent attenuation and dispersion on speed of sound estimates in cancellous bone. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  C-C Glüer,et al.  In vitro speed of sound measurement at intact human femur specimens. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  Françoise Peyrin,et al.  An In Vitro Study of the Ultrasonic Axial Transmission Technique at the Radius: 1‐MHz Velocity Measurements Are Sensitive to Both Mineralization and Intracortical Porosity , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[20]  C. Wu,et al.  Assessment of a New Quantitative Ultrasound Calcaneus Measurement: Precision and Discrimination of Hip Fractures in Elderly Women Compared with Dual X-ray Absorptiometry , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[21]  R. Luypaert,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: an in vivo comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and magnetic resonance imaging. , 2000, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[22]  F. Padilla,et al.  In Vitro Ultrasound Measurement at the Human Femur , 2004, Calcified Tissue International.

[23]  G. Berger,et al.  Ultrasound parametric imaging of the calcaneus:In vivo results with a new device , 1996, Calcified Tissue International.

[24]  M. Ooms,et al.  Ultrasound measurements in the calcaneus: precision and its relation with bone mineral density of the heel, hip, and lumbar spine. , 1996, Bone.

[25]  P. Laugier,et al.  Velocity dispersion of acoustic waves in cancellous bone , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[26]  H. Genant,et al.  Comparison of ultrasound and bone mineral density assessment of the calcaneus with different regions of interest in healthy early menopausal women. , 1999, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[27]  C. Langton,et al.  Comparison of bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: site-matched correlation and discrimination of axial BMD status. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[28]  F. Padilla,et al.  Effects of frequency-dependent attenuation and velocity dispersion on in vitro ultrasound velocity measurements in intact human femur specimens , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[29]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  Prediction of the strength of the elderly proximal femur by bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements of the heel and tibia. , 1999, Bone.

[30]  H. Trębacz,et al.  Ultrasound Velocity and Attenuation in Cancellous Bone Samples from Lumbar Vertebra and Calcaneus , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[31]  K. Wear,et al.  Relationships of ultrasonic backscatter with ultrasonic attenuation, sound speed and bone mineral density in human calcaneus. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[32]  B. Garra,et al.  Assessment of bone density using ultrasonic backscatter. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[33]  K. Wear,et al.  Measurements of phase velocity and group velocity in human calcaneus. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[34]  R Porcher,et al.  Ultrasonic Backscatter and Transmission Parameters at the Os Calcis in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[35]  Jacques P. Brown,et al.  Standards and guidelines for performing central dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in premenopausal women, men, and children. , 2004, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[36]  F Peyrin,et al.  Ultrasonic characterization of human cancellous bone using transmission and backscatter measurements: relationships to density and microstructure. , 2002, Bone.

[37]  R. B. Ashman,et al.  Elastic modulus of trabecular bone material. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  J. Cunningham,et al.  Ultrasound velocity and attenuation at different skeletal sites compared with bone mineral density measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. , 1996, The British journal of radiology.

[39]  Harry K. Genant,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound: Assessment of Osteoporosis and Bone Status , 1999 .

[40]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound of the Calcaneus Reflects the Mechanical Properties of Calcaneal Trabecular Bone , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[41]  K. Wear,et al.  The effects of frequency-dependent attenuation and dispersion on sound speed measurements: applications in human trabecular bone , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[42]  G Berger,et al.  In vitro assessment of the relationship between acoustic properties and bone mass density of the calcaneus by comparison of ultrasound parametric imaging and quantitative computed tomography. , 1997, Bone.