Influence of centrifuge brake on residual platelet count and routine coagulation tests in citrated plasma

Sample centrifugation is an essential step in the coagulation laboratory, as clotting tests are typically performed on citrated platelet (PLT) poor plasma (PPP). Nevertheless, no clear indication has been provided as to whether centrifugation of specimens should be performed with the centrifuge brake set to on or off. Fifty consecutive sodium citrate anticoagulated samples were collected and divided into two aliquots. The former was centrifuged as for Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines with the centrifuge brake set to on, whereas the latter was centrifuged again as for CLSI guidelines, but with the brake set to off. In the PPP of all samples, a PLT count was performed, followed by the analysis of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT) and fibrinogen (FBG). The PLT count after samples centrifugation was substantially reduced, either with centrifuge brake set to on or off (5 ± 1 versus 3 ± 1 × 109/l; P = 0.009). The frequency of samples exceeding a PLT count less than 10 × 109/l was nearly double in samples centrifuged with the brake on than in those with the brake off (14 versus 8%; P < 0.01). Although no significant difference was found for APTT values, PT was slightly prolonged using the centrifuge brake set to on (mean bias 0.2 s; P < 0.001). FBG values were also significantly higher using the centrifuge brake set to on (mean bias 0.29 g/l; P < 0.001). The results of this study indicate that sample centrifugation for routine coagulation testing should be preferably performed with the centrifuge brake set to off for providing a better quality specimen.

[1]  M. Daves,et al.  Pre-analytic variability in cardiovascular biomarker testing. , 2015, Journal of thoracic disease.

[2]  G. Lippi,et al.  Quality Standards for Sample Processing, Transportation, and Storage in Hemostasis Testing , 2012, Seminars in Thrombosis & Hemostasis.

[3]  G. Lippi,et al.  Quality Standards for Sample Collection in Coagulation Testing , 2012, Seminars in Thrombosis & Hemostasis.

[4]  M. Keeney,et al.  Initial performance evaluation of the UniCel® DxH 800 Coulter® cellular analysis system , 2011, International journal of laboratory hematology.

[5]  G. Lippi,et al.  Preanalytical and Postanalytical Variables: The Leading Causes of Diagnostic Error in Hemostasis? , 2008, Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis.

[6]  G. Lippi,et al.  Dishomogeneous separation of citrated plasma in primary collection tubes for routine coagulation testing. , 2008, Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis.

[7]  G. Lippi,et al.  Influence of the centrifuge time of primary plasma tubes on routine coagulation testing , 2007, Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis.

[8]  G. Lippi,et al.  Quality and reliability of routine coagulation testing: can we trust that sample? , 2006, Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis.

[9]  G. Lippi,et al.  Preanalytical variability: the dark side of the moon in laboratory testing , 2006, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[10]  C. Toh,et al.  Back to the future: testing in disseminated intravascular coagulation , 2005, Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis.

[11]  M. Mosesson Fibrinogen and fibrin structure and functions , 2005, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[12]  C Ricós,et al.  Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.