Mechanical Evaluation of Articulating Instruments and Cross-Handed Manipulation in Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery

Background. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) is limited by loss of triangulation and internal instruments conflict. To overcome these difficulties, some concepts have been introduced, namely, articulating instruments and cross-handed manipulation, which causes the right hand to control the left instrument tip and vice versa. The aim of this study was to compare task performance with different approaches based on a mechanical evaluation platform. Methods. A LESS mechanical evaluation platform was set up to investigate the performance of 2 tasks (suture pass-through rings and clip-cut) with 3 different settings: uncrossed manipulation with straight instruments (group A, the control group), uncrossed manipulation with articulating instruments (group B), and cross-handed manipulation with articulating instruments (group C). The operation time and average load required for accomplishment of the standard tasks were measured. Results. Group A presented significantly better time scores than group B, and group C consumed the longest time to accomplish the 2 tasks (P < .05). Comparing of average load required to perform the suture pass-through rings task, it differed significantly between dominant and nondominant hand in all groups (P < .01) and was less in group A and group B than group C in dominant hand (P < .01), while it was almost the same in all groups in the nondominant hand. In terms of average load requirement to accomplish clip-cut task, it was almost equal not only between group A and B but also between dominant and nondominant hand while the increase reached statistical significance when comparing group C with other groups (P < .05). Conclusions. Compared with conventional devices and maneuvering techniques, articulating instruments and cross-handed manipulation are associated with longer operation time and higher workload. Instruments with better maneuverability should be developed in the future for LESS.

[1]  A. Saber,et al.  Single Incision Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (SILS): A Novel Technique , 2008, Obesity surgery.

[2]  Stuart I. Brown,et al.  Comparison of endoscopic task performance with crossed versus uncrossed straight and curved instruments through a single port , 2012, Surgical Endoscopy.

[3]  François Pugin,et al.  Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy , 2008, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[4]  Jihad H Kaouk,et al.  Laparo‐endoscopic single‐site surgery: preliminary advances in renal surgery , 2009, BJU international.

[5]  L. Stassen,et al.  The use of curved vs. straight instruments in single port access surgery, on standardized box trainer tasks , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[6]  J. Romanelli,et al.  Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[7]  F. Remzi,et al.  Single‐port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery , 2008, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[8]  TRANSUMBILICAL LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY: CURRENT STATUS AND CONTROVERSIES , 2011 .

[9]  N. Soper,et al.  Effect of training and instrument type on performance in single-incision laparoscopy: Results of a randomized comparison using a surgical simulator , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[10]  Barbara L. Bass,et al.  “Chopstick” surgery: a novel technique improves surgeon performance and eliminates arm collision in robotic single-incision laparoscopic surgery , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[11]  C. Thompson,et al.  Evaluation of a manually driven, multitasking platform for complex endoluminal and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery applications (with video). , 2009, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[12]  Jiang-fan Zhu.  Transumbilical endoscopic surgery: History, present situation and perspectives. , 2011, World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy.