Inboard Stall Delay Due to Rotation

In the design process of improved rotor blades the need for accurate aerodynamic predictions is very important. During the last years a large effort has gone into developing CFD tools for prediction of wind turbine flows (Duque et al., 2003; Fletcher et al., 2009; Sorensen et al.,2002). However, there are still some unclear aspects for engineers regarding the practical application of CFD, such as computational domain size, reference system for different computational blocks, mesh quality and mesh number, turbulence, etc. Thus, in the design process and in the power curve prediction of wind turbines, the aerodynamic forces are calculated with some form of the blade element method (BEM) and its extensions to the three-dimensional wing aerodynamics. The results obtained by the standard methods are reasonably accurate in the proximity of the design point, but in stalled condition the BEM is known to underpredict the forces acting on the blades (Himmelskamp, 1947). The major disadvantage of these methods is that the airflow is reduced to axial and circumferential flow components (Glauert, 1963). Disregarding radial flow components present in the bottom of separated boundary layers of rotating wings leads to alteration of lift and drag characteristics of the individual blade sections with respect to the 2-D airfoils (Bjorck, 1995). Airfoil characteristics of lift (CL) and drag (CD) coefficients are normally derived from twodimensional (2-D) wind tunnel tests. However, after stall the flow over the inboard half of the rotor is strongly influenced by poorly understood 3-D effects (Banks & Gadd, 1963; Tangler, 2002). The 3-D effects yield delayed stall with CL higher than 2.0 near the blade root location and with correspondingly high CD. Now the design of constant speed, stallregulated wind turbines lacks adequate theory for predicting their peak and post-peak power and loads. During the development of stall-regulated wind turbines, there were several attempts to predict 3-D post-stall airfoil characteristics (Corrigan & Schlichting, 1994; Du & Schling, 1998; Snel et al., 1993), but these methods predicted insufficient delayed stall in the root region and tended to extend the delayed stall region too far out on the blade. The present work aims at giving a conceptualization of the complex 3-D flow field on a rotor blade, where stall begins and how it progresses, driven by the needs to formulate a reasonably simple model that complements the 2-D airfoil characteristics used to predict rotor performance. Understanding wind turbine aerodynamics (Hansen & Butterfield, 1993) in all working states is one of the key factors in making improved predictions of their performance. The flow field associated with wind turbines is highly three-dimensional and the transition to two-dimensional outboard separated flow is yet not well understood. A continued effort is

[1]  A. Hansen,et al.  Aerodynamics of Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbines , 1993 .

[2]  M. Selig,et al.  A 3-D stall-delay model for horizontal axis wind turbine performance prediction , 1998 .

[3]  J. Rauch,et al.  3D Numerical Simulation and Evaluation of the Air Flow Through Wind Turbine Rotors with Focus on the Hub Area , 2007 .

[4]  Niels N. Sørensen,et al.  Navier-Stokes predictions of the NREL phase VI rotor in the NASA Ames 80-by-120 wind tunnel , 2002 .

[5]  B. R. Williams,et al.  Viscous-inviscid interactions in external aerodynamics , 1987 .

[6]  J. C. Narramore,et al.  Navier-Stokes calculations of inboard stall delay due to rotation , 1992 .

[7]  Horia Dumitrescu,et al.  BOUNDARY LAYER STATE AND FLOW FIELD STRUCTURE ON WIND TURBINE BLADES , 2005 .

[8]  W. S. Lewellen,et al.  Boundary layers and their interactions in rotating flows , 1966 .

[9]  Richard E. Brown,et al.  Predicting wind turbine blade loads using vorticity transport and RANS methodologies , 2009 .

[10]  H. A. Dwyer,et al.  Methods of analyzing propeller and rotor boundary layers with crossflow , 1970 .

[11]  Ervin Bossanyi,et al.  Wind Energy Handbook , 2001 .

[12]  Scott Schreck,et al.  Boundary Layer State and Flow Field Structure Underlying Rotational Augmentation of Blade Aerodynamic Response , 2003 .

[13]  U. Dallmann Topological structures of three-dimensional vortex flow separation , 1983 .

[14]  James L. Tangler,et al.  Insight into Wind Turbine Stall and Post-stall Aerodynamics , 2004 .

[15]  M. Drela XFOIL: An Analysis and Design System for Low Reynolds Number Airfoils , 1989 .

[16]  Vladimir Cardos,et al.  Inboard boundary layer state on wind turbine blades , 2009 .

[17]  Earl P. N. Duque,et al.  Navier-Stokes and Comprehensive Analysis Performance Predictions of the NREL Phase VI Experiment , 2003 .

[18]  G. Vatistas,et al.  A simpler model for concentrated vortices , 1991 .

[19]  F. Coton,et al.  A study on rotational effects and different stall delay models using a prescribed wake vortex scheme and NREL phase VI experiment data , 2008 .

[20]  Srinath V. Ekkad,et al.  Modeling and Computation of Boundary-Layer Flows , 1998 .

[21]  Alexandru Dumitrache,et al.  Modelling of inboard stall delay due to rotation , 2007 .

[22]  Laurence Eugene Fogarty The Laminar Boundary Layer on a Rotating Blade , 1951 .

[23]  James L. Tangler The Nebulous Art of Using Wind-Tunnel Airfoil Data for Predicting Rotor Performance , 2002 .

[24]  W. R. Sears Potential Flow Around a Rotating Cylindrical Blade , 1950 .

[25]  P. K. Chaviaropoulos,et al.  Investigating Three-Dimensional and Rotational Effects on Wind Turbine Blades by Means of a Quasi-3D Navier-Stokes Solver , 2000 .

[26]  Arthur Mager,et al.  Generalization of Boundary-Layer Momentum-Integral Equations to Three-Dimensional Flows Including Those of Rotating System , 1952 .

[27]  James Tangler,et al.  Wind Turbine Post-Stall Airfoil Performance Characteristics Guidelines for Blade-Element Momentum Methods: Preprint , 2005 .

[28]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[29]  Y. Miyake,et al.  A laminar boundary layer on a rotating three-dimensional blade , 1974 .

[30]  E. A. Arens,et al.  Analysis of the experimental and computational flow characteristics with respect to the augmented lift phenomenon caused by blade rotation , 2007 .

[31]  Michael S. Selig,et al.  The effect of rotation on the boundary layer of a wind turbine blade , 2000 .

[32]  Vladimir Cardos,et al.  Rotational Effects on the Boundary-Layer Flow in Wind Turbines , 2004 .

[33]  Jens Nørkær Sørensen,et al.  Quasi-3D Navier-Stokes Model for a Rotating Airfoil , 1999 .

[34]  Scott Schreck,et al.  Rotational augmentation of horizontal axis wind turbine blade aerodynamic response , 2002 .

[35]  W. Tillmann,et al.  Investigations of the wall-shearing stress in turbulent boundary layers , 1950 .

[36]  L. E. Fogarty,et al.  Potential Flow Around a Rotating, Advancing Cylindrical Blade , 1950 .

[37]  W. H. H. Banks,et al.  DELAYING EFFECT OF ROTATION ON LAMINAR SEPARATION , 1963 .

[38]  Vladimir Cardos,et al.  Analysis of Leading-Edge Separation Bubbles on Rotating Blades , 2010 .

[39]  H. Schlichting Boundary Layer Theory , 1955 .

[40]  B. Lakshminarayana,et al.  Analysis of Turbulent Boundary Layer on Cascade and Rotor Blades of Turbomachinery , 1981 .

[41]  Göran Ronsten,et al.  Static pressure measurements on a rotating and a non-rotating 2.375 m wind turbine blade. Comparison with 2D calculations , 1992 .