Impact of Bias-Correction Methods on Effectiveness of Assimilating SMAP Soil Moisture Data into NCEP Global Forecast System Using the Ensemble Kalman Filter

Improving numerical weather prediction was one of the main justifications for National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Soil Moisture Active/Passive (SMAP) Mission. The ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) has been extensively applied to assimilate the SM observations into numerical weather predication models. Implementation of EnKF requires the observations and model simulations to be Gaussian distributed and not biased from each other. In this letter, we tested the impacts of three bias-correction methods on effectiveness of assimilating SMAP retrievals into the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration—National Centers for Environmental Prediction Global Forecast System (GFS). They are: 1) global cumulative distribution function (CDF) matching with only one CDF for all grids and time series; 2) monthly CDF matching with one CDF for each grid; 3) the linear transformation technique that matches monthly mean and standard deviation of the SMAP retrievals and model simulations for each grid; and 4) assimilating SMAP SM data into GFS without any bias-correction procedure. With respect to the global land data assimilation (DA) system precipitation product, the results demonstrate that the effectiveness of assimilating SMAP retrievals into GFS is significantly impacted by the bias-correction methods. Relative to other DA cases, the monthly CDF matching produces the best precipitation forecast performance. Improvements of the three-hourly GFS precipitation prediction with SMAP assimilation using the monthly CDF matching can reach to 8% and 10% in sparsely and densely vegetated areas, respectively, and marginally positive in medium vegetation areas. Based on these results, assimilating SMAP retrievals into the GFS with the EnKF algorithm using the monthly CDF matching method is suggested for enhancing accuracy of the precipitation forecasts.

[1]  Youfei Zheng,et al.  Improving Noah land surface model performance using near real time surface albedo and green vegetation fraction , 2016 .

[2]  Yann Kerr,et al.  Assessment of the SMAP Passive Soil Moisture Product , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  N. McDowell,et al.  Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group 1-2013 A Remotely Sensed Global Terrestrial Drought Severity Index , 2017 .

[4]  Jeffrey P. Walker,et al.  THE GLOBAL LAND DATA ASSIMILATION SYSTEM , 2004 .

[5]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  Bias reduction in short records of satellite soil moisture , 2004 .

[6]  Li Fang,et al.  Enhancing Model Skill by Assimilating SMOPS Blended Soil Moisture Product into Noah Land Surface Model , 2015 .

[7]  Sujay V. Kumar,et al.  Benchmarking NLDAS-2 Soil Moisture and Evapotranspiration to Separate Uncertainty Contributions. , 2016, Journal of hydrometeorology.

[8]  Sujay V. Kumar,et al.  Evaluating the utility of satellite soil moisture retrievals over irrigated areas and the ability of land data assimilation methods to correct for unmodeled processes , 2015 .

[9]  J. Janowiak,et al.  Global Land Precipitation: A 50-yr Monthly Analysis Based on Gauge Observations , 2002 .

[10]  Youfei Zheng,et al.  Optimal ensemble size of ensemble Kalman filter in sequential soil moisture data assimilation , 2015 .

[11]  Dara Entekhabi,et al.  An initial assessment of SMAP soil moisture retrievals using high‐resolution model simulations and in situ observations , 2016 .

[12]  Kelly K. Caylor,et al.  Validation of SMAP surface soil moisture products with core validation sites , 2017, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[13]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  Application of Triple Collocation in Ground-Based Validation of Soil Moisture Active/Passive (SMAP) Level 2 Data Products , 2017, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Youfei Zheng,et al.  Impact of quality control of satellite soil moisture data on their assimilation into land surface model , 2014 .

[15]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  A Comparative Study of the SMAP Passive Soil Moisture Product With Existing Satellite-Based Soil Moisture Products , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  William L. Crosson,et al.  Assimilation of SMOS Retrievals in the Land Information System , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[17]  W. Crow,et al.  L band microwave remote sensing and land data assimilation improve the representation of prestorm soil moisture conditions for hydrologic forecasting , 2017, Geophysical research letters.

[18]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  On the Nature of Soil Moisture in Land Surface Models , 2009 .

[19]  Jiancheng Shi,et al.  The Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Mission , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.