All teach, all learn, all improve?: The role of interorganizational learning in quality improvement collaboratives

Background: Quality improvement collaboratives are an increasingly common strategy for implementing evidence-based practices in health care. However, research shows that many participating organizations do not achieve the level of performance improvement desired. Purpose: This study examined the use of interorganizational learning activities (inter-OLAs) as an explanation for mixed performance improvement among collaborative participants. We tested the hypotheses that inter-OLA use is positively associated with participants’ performance improvement and that this relationship is moderated by the use of intraorganizational learning activities (intra-OLAs) and quality-focused human resource (Q-HR) practices. Methodology: We conducted a survey of organizational teams participating in 4 Institute for Healthcare Improvement Breakthrough Series collaboratives. Survey responses from 52 teams, regarding the use of inter-OLAs, intra-OLAs and Q-HR practices, were linked to performance improvement data obtained from the Institute for Healthcare Improvement and demographic data obtained from secondary sources. Findings: The more collaborative teams used inter-OLAs, the more their organizations’ performance improved. Contrary to our hypothesis, the use of intra-OLAs did not moderate this relationship; teams’ use of intra-OLAs added to, but did not multiply, the effect of inter-OLA use. In contrast, an organization’s use of Q-HR practices multiplied the performance benefit of inter-OLA use. Practice Implications: Our findings suggest that organizations that participate in collaboratives are more likely to improve their performance if they use the inter-OLAs offered by the collaborative. Our results also suggest that complementing high use of inter-OLAs with intra-OLA use and Q-HR practices enhances performance improvement. For collaborative sponsors, our findings imply that including activities that facilitate interorganizational and intraorganizational learning are worthwhile.

[1]  Wendy Messenger Learning and learning. , 2017, Transactions of the St. John's Hospital Dermatological Society.

[2]  P. Groenewegen,et al.  Exploring the black box of quality improvement collaboratives: modelling relations between conditions, applied changes and outcomes , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[3]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Organizational Learning from Extreme Performance Experience: The Impact of Success and Recovery Experience , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[4]  K. Mcinnes,et al.  Associations Between Organizational Characteristics and Quality Improvement Activities of Clinics Participating in a Quality Improvement Collaborative , 2009, Medical care.

[5]  C Joseph McCannon,et al.  Learning networks for sustainable, large-scale improvement. , 2009, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[6]  Ingrid M. Nembhard Learning and improving in quality improvement collaboratives: which collaborative features do participants value most? , 2009, Health services research.

[7]  Rangaraj Ramanujam,et al.  Why Does the Quality of Health Care Continue to Lag? Insights from Management Research. , 2009 .

[8]  R. Grol,et al.  Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: systematic review , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  W. Berta,et al.  Learning from preventable adverse events in health care organizations: Development of a multilevel model of learning and propositions , 2007, Health care management review.

[10]  Anita L. Tucker,et al.  Implementing New Practices: An Empirical Study of Organizational Learning in Hospital Intensive Care Units , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[11]  S. Cretin,et al.  How do teams in quality improvement collaboratives interact? , 2007, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[12]  J. Dawson,et al.  Reducing patient mortality in hospitals: the role of human resource management , 2006 .

[13]  G. V. D. Vegt,et al.  Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification , 2005 .

[14]  J. Teno,et al.  Ameliorating Pain in Nursing Homes: A Collaborative Quality‐Improvement Project , 2004, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[15]  Sze-Sze Wong,et al.  Distal and Local Group Learning: Performance Trade-offs and Tensions , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[16]  Peter Mendel,et al.  The Role of Perceived Team Effectiveness in Improving Chronic Illness Care , 2004, Medical care.

[17]  P. Plsek,et al.  Collaborative quality improvement to promote evidence based surfactant for preterm infants: a cluster randomised trial , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  Brian S Mittman,et al.  Creating the Evidence Base for Quality Improvement Collaboratives , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[19]  Paul D Cleary,et al.  Effects of a Quality Improvement Collaborative on the Outcome of Care of Patients with HIV Infection: The EQHIV Study , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[20]  W. Berta,et al.  Factors that impact the transfer and retention of best practices for reducing error in hospitals. , 2004, Health care management review.

[21]  Gary P. Pisano,et al.  Learning How and Learning What: Effects of Tacit and Codified Knowledge on Performance Improvement Following Technology Adoption , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[22]  Linda Argote,et al.  Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[23]  Tim Wilson,et al.  What do collaborative improvement projects do? Experience from seven countries. , 2003, Joint Commission journal on quality and safety.

[24]  James C. Robinson,et al.  As good as it gets? Chronic care management in nine leading US physician organisations , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  Jin Nam Choi External Activities and Team Effectiveness , 2002 .

[26]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[27]  W. Powell Learning from Collaboration: Knowledge and Networks in the Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries , 1998 .

[28]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Customization or Conformity? An Institutional and Network Perspective on the Content and Consequences of TQM Adoption , 1997 .

[29]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm , 1996 .

[30]  Mark A. Huselid The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[31]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[32]  J. Schermerhorn Information sharing as an interorganizational activity. , 1977, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[33]  Henrik Bresman,et al.  External Learning Activities and Team Performance: A Multimethod Field Study , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[34]  Cardiovascular risk tables Estimating risk is not the problem , using it to tailor treatment to individuals , 2008 .

[35]  H. Bradbury,et al.  Handbook of action research , 2006 .

[36]  C M Kilo,et al.  Improving care through collaboration. , 1999, Pediatrics.