Who, Me? How Virtual Agents Can Shape Conversational Footing in Virtual Reality

The nonverbal behaviors of conversational partners reflect their conversational footing, signaling who in the group are the speakers, addressees, bystanders, and overhearers. Many applications of virtual reality (VR) will involve multiparty conversations with virtual agents and avatars of others where appropriate signaling of footing will be critical. In this paper, we introduce computational models of gaze and spatial orientation that a virtual agent can use to signal specific footing configurations. An evaluation of these models through a user study found that participants conformed to conversational roles signaled by the agent and contributed to the conversation more as addressees than as bystanders. We observed these effects in immersive VR, but not on a 2D display, suggesting an increased sensitivity to virtual agents’ footing cues in VR-based interfaces.

[1]  K. Williams,et al.  Cyberostracism: effects of being ignored over the Internet. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  A. Kendon Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[3]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Eyes alive , 2002, ACM Trans. Graph..

[4]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  The Unbearable Likeness of Being Digital: The Persistence of Nonverbal Social Norms in Online Virtual Environments , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[5]  A. Bronstein,et al.  A new paradigm to investigate the roles of head and eye movements in the coordination of whole-body movements , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Marta Kristín Lárusdóttir,et al.  Avatars in Conversation: The Importance of Simulating Territorial Behavior , 2010, IVA.

[7]  Sean Andrist,et al.  Designing effective gaze mechanisms for virtual agents , 2012, CHI.

[8]  Kathleen E Cullen,et al.  Eye, head, and body coordination during large gaze shifts in rhesus monkeys: movement kinematics and the influence of posture. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Dirk Heylen,et al.  Head Gestures, Gaze and the Principles of Conversational Structure , 2006, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[10]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Equilibrium Theory Revisited: Mutual Gaze and Personal Space in Virtual Environments , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[11]  Mel Slater,et al.  The impact of avatar realism and eye gaze control on perceived quality of communication in a shared immersive virtual environment , 2003, CHI '03.

[12]  H. Kuzuoka,et al.  Reconfiguring spatial formation arrangement by robot body orientation , 2010, HRI 2010.

[13]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Models for Multiparty Engagement in Open-World Dialog , 2009, SIGDIAL Conference.

[14]  J. Loomis,et al.  Interpersonal Distance in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[15]  Robin Wolff,et al.  Eye-tracking for avatar eye-gaze and interactional analysis in immersive collaborative virtual environments , 2008, CSCW.

[16]  Dirk Heylen,et al.  CONTROLLING THE GAZE OF CONVERSATIONAL AGENTS , 2005 .

[17]  E. Schegloff Sequencing in Conversational Openings , 1968 .

[18]  M. Argyle,et al.  Gaze and Mutual Gaze , 1994, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[19]  Hannes Högni Vilhjálmsson,et al.  SPONTANEOUS AVATAR BEHAVIOR FOR HUMAN TERRITORIALITY , 2010, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[20]  M. Argyle,et al.  EYE-CONTACT, DISTANCE AND AFFILIATION. , 1965, Sociometry.

[21]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Multiparty Turn Taking in Situated Dialog: Study, Lessons, and Directions , 2011, SIGDIAL Conference.

[22]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Gaze and task performance in shared virtual environments , 2002, Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds.

[23]  Dirk Heylen,et al.  Experimenting with the Gaze of a Conversational Agent , 2002 .

[24]  Sean Andrist,et al.  Gaze and Attention Management for Embodied Conversational Agents , 2015, ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst..

[25]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Conversational gaze mechanisms for humanlike robots , 2012, TIIS.

[26]  T. Uemura,et al.  Eye-head coordination during lateral gaze in normal subjects. , 1980, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[27]  A. Aron,et al.  Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness , 1992 .

[28]  A. Kendon Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters , 1990 .

[29]  Sean Andrist,et al.  Conversational Gaze Aversion for Virtual Agents , 2013, IVA.

[30]  Matthias J. Wieser,et al.  Virtual Social Interactions in Social Anxiety - The Impact of Sex, Gaze, and Interpersonal Distance , 2010, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[31]  Lynne Goodstein,et al.  On being ignored: The effects of the violation of implicit rules of social interaction. , 1974 .