Clinicians' perception of head-of-bed elevation.

BACKGROUND Head-of-bed elevation of 30 degrees to 45 degrees is important in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia, but clinicians' perception and determination of head-of-bed elevation are not widely reported. OBJECTIVES To (1) document the accuracy of clinicians' perception of head-of-bed elevation, (2) document methods clinicians use to determine the head-of-bed angle, and (3) assess knowledge of recommended head-of-bed elevation. METHODS Clinicians (n = 175) viewed a simulated patient with head of bed elevated 30 degrees and elevation gauge concealed. They answered 3 questions: What is the level of the head of the bed? What head-of-bed elevation is associated with decreased incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia? When providing care, how do you routinely determine the head-of-bed elevation? RESULTS Fifty percent of 89 registered nurses and 53% of 39 physicians identified head-of-bed elevation correctly (+/-5 degrees ). Head-of-bed elevation was perceived accurately by 86% of 21 respiratory therapists, 63% of 16 medical assistants, and 50% of 10 physical/occupational therapists. Ninety-five percent of nurses and respiratory therapists, 79% of physicians, 90% of physical/occupational therapists, and 46% of medical assistants correctly identified the head-of-bed angle associated with decreases in occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Techniques for determining the angle varied; 58% of respondents reported using the gauge. CONCLUSIONS Head-of-bed angle was perceived correctly by 50% to 86% of clinicians. Nurses tended to underestimate the angle, whereas other clinicians tended to overestimate. Nurses, respiratory therapists, and physical/occupational therapists showed the best understanding of the correct angle for minimizing occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Elevation gauges were most often used to determine the angle.

[1]  T. Dremsa,et al.  Adoption of a ventilator-associated pneumonia clinical practice guideline. , 2006, Worldviews on evidence-based nursing.

[2]  Larry J. Anderson,et al.  Guidelines for preventing health-care-associated pneumonia, 2003 recommendations of the CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. , 2004, Respiratory care.

[3]  M. J. Grap,et al.  Predictors of backrest elevation in critical care. , 2003, Intensive & critical care nursing.

[4]  D. Cook,et al.  Prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia: current practice in Canadian intensive care units. , 2002, Journal of critical care.

[5]  M. Sole,et al.  Analysis of factors related to the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia: use of existing databases. , 2000, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[6]  L. Anderson,et al.  Guideline for Prevention of Nosocomial Pneumonia , 1994, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[7]  Carolyn L Cason,et al.  Nurses' implementation of guidelines for ventilator-associated pneumonia from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. , 2007, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[8]  Arlene F Tolentino-DelosReyes,et al.  Evidence-based practice: use of the ventilator bundle to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia. , 2007, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[9]  M. J. Grap,et al.  Nurses' accuracy in estimating backrest elevation. , 2002, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[10]  D. Cook,et al.  Ventilator associated pneumonia: perspectives on the burden of illness , 2000, Intensive Care Medicine.