Engaged Problem Formulation in IS Research
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jungwoo Lee,et al. Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..
[2] Roel Wieringa,et al. Relevance and Problem Choice in Design Science , 2010, DESRIST.
[3] Jerry N. Luftman,et al. Key information technology and management issues 2011–2012: an international study , 2012, J. Inf. Technol..
[4] Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al. Theory Development in Design Science Research: Anatomy of a Research Project , 2008 .
[5] Rikard Lindgren,et al. Design Principles for Competence Management Systems: A Synthesis of an Action Research Study , 2004, MIS Q..
[6] Lars Mathiassen,et al. Engaged Scholarship in IS Research , 2008, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..
[7] Lars Mathiassen,et al. Managing Risk in Software Process Improvement: An Action Research Approach , 2004, MIS Q..
[8] H. Simon,et al. The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.) , 1996 .
[9] Shirley Gregor,et al. The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..
[10] Peter Axel Nielsen,et al. Is Action Research and Its Criteria , 2007 .
[11] Robert M. Davison,et al. Principles of canonical action research , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..
[12] Mike Chiasson,et al. Pluralist action research: a review of the information systems literature * , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..
[13] Peter Checkland,et al. Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1990 .
[14] James R Cook. Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research , 2014 .
[15] Lars Mathiassen,et al. Back to thinking mode: diaries for the management of information systems development projects , 1989 .
[16] Blaize Horner Reich,et al. IT alignment: what have we learned? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..
[17] Jerry N. Luftman,et al. Key Issues for IT Executives 2011: Cautious Optimism in Uncertain Economic Times , 2011, MIS Q. Executive.
[18] R. Rapoport. Three Dilemmas in Action Research , 1970 .
[19] Peter Axel Nielsen,et al. IT Management in Local Government: The DISIMIT Project , 2012 .
[20] Colin Ashurst,et al. Improving the impact of IT development projects: the benefits realization capability model , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[21] Sandeep Purao,et al. Action Design Research , 2011, MIS Q..
[22] Kristin Braa,et al. Balancing interpretation and intervention in information systems research: the action case approach , 1997 .
[23] Yuan Long,et al. Synthesizing e-government stage models - a meta-synthesis based on meta-ethnography approach , 2005, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..
[24] A. Pettigrew. WHAT IS A PROCESSUAL ANALYSIS. , 1997 .
[25] Donald A. Sch. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action , 1983 .
[26] Michael Rosemann,et al. Toward Improving the Relevance of Information Systems Research to Practice: The Role of Applicability Checks , 2008, MIS Q..
[27] John Forester,et al. The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes , 1999 .
[28] A. Pettigrew. Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .
[29] Juhani Iivari,et al. A Paradigmatic Analysis of Information Systems As a Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..
[30] Judy McKay,et al. The dual imperatives of action research , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.
[31] J. H. Frey,et al. The group interview in social research , 1991 .
[32] Jerry N. Luftman. Assessing Business-IT Alignment Maturity , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[33] Jörgen Sandberg,et al. Generating Research Questions Through Problematization , 2011 .
[34] Roel Wieringa,et al. Design science as nested problem solving , 2009, DESRIST.
[35] Elizabeth Daniel,et al. Benefits management : delivering value from IS & IT investments , 2005 .
[36] A. V. D. Ven,et al. Knowledge for Theory and Practice , 2006 .
[37] Juhani Iivari,et al. Distinguishing and contrasting two strategies for design science research , 2015, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[38] Sue Holwell,et al. Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field , 1998 .
[39] S. Spall,et al. Peer Debriefing in Qualitative Research: Emerging Operational Models , 1998 .
[40] G. Susman,et al. An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .
[41] John Mingers,et al. Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..
[42] John M. Ward,et al. Building Better Business Cases for IT Investments , 2008, MIS Q. Executive.
[43] M. Hult,et al. TOWARDS A DEFINITION OF ACTION RESEARCH: A NOTE AND BIBLIOGRAPHY , 1980 .
[44] Alan R. Hevner,et al. The Three Cycle View of Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..
[45] Zahir Irani,et al. Managing e‐Government: value positions and relationships , 2015, Inf. Syst. J..
[46] Juhani Iivari,et al. Action research and design science research - Seemingly similar but decisively dissimilar , 2009, ECIS.
[47] Pär Mårtensson,et al. Dialogical Action Research at Omega Corporation , 2004, MIS Q..
[48] P. Järvinen. Action Research is Similar to Design Science , 2007 .
[49] David E. Avison,et al. Controlling action research projects , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.
[50] Martin Bichler,et al. Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..
[51] Lars Mathiassen,et al. Collaborative Practice Research , 2000, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..
[52] Richard Baskerville,et al. Special issue on action research in information systems: making is research relevant to practice--foreword , 2004 .
[53] L. Diamond. IT Governance : How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results , 2005 .
[54] Ephraim R. McLean,et al. Key Issues for IT Executives , 2004, MIS Q. Executive.