Automated regional behavioral analysis for human brain images

Behavioral categories of functional imaging experiments along with standardized brain coordinates of associated activations were used to develop a method to automate regional behavioral analysis of human brain images. Behavioral and coordinate data were taken from the BrainMap database (http://www.brainmap.org/), which documents over 20 years of published functional brain imaging studies. A brain region of interest (ROI) for behavioral analysis can be defined in functional images, anatomical images or brain atlases, if images are spatially normalized to MNI or Talairach standards. Results of behavioral analysis are presented for each of BrainMap's 51 behavioral sub-domains spanning five behavioral domains (Action, Cognition, Emotion, Interoception, and Perception). For each behavioral sub-domain the fraction of coordinates falling within the ROI was computed and compared with the fraction expected if coordinates for the behavior were not clustered, i.e., uniformly distributed. When the difference between these fractions is large behavioral association is indicated. A z-score ≥ 3.0 was used to designate statistically significant behavioral association. The left-right symmetry of ~100K activation foci was evaluated by hemisphere, lobe, and by behavioral sub-domain. Results highlighted the classic left-side dominance for language while asymmetry for most sub-domains (~75%) was not statistically significant. Use scenarios were presented for anatomical ROIs from the Harvard-Oxford cortical (HOC) brain atlas, functional ROIs from statistical parametric maps in a TMS-PET study, a task-based fMRI study, and ROIs from the ten “major representative” functional networks in a previously published resting state fMRI study. Statistically significant behavioral findings for these use scenarios were consistent with published behaviors for associated anatomical and functional regions.

[1]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  L. Binder Hemispheric specialization. , 1988, The Psychiatric clinics of North America.

[3]  Angela R Laird,et al.  Brainmap taxonomy of experimental design: Description and evaluation , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[4]  Luke J. Chang,et al.  Decoding the role of the insula in human cognition: functional parcellation and large-scale reverse inference. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Co-activation patterns distinguish cortical modules, their connectivity and functional differentiation , 2011, NeuroImage.

[6]  Katiuscia Sacco,et al.  Functional Connectivity and Coactivation of the Nucleus Accumbens: A Combined Functional Connectivity and Structure-Based Meta-analysis , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data , 2011, Nature Methods.

[8]  Jessica A. Turner,et al.  ALE Meta-Analysis Workflows Via the Brainmap Database: Progress Towards A Probabilistic Functional Brain Atlas , 2009, Front. Neuroinform..

[9]  L. Parsons,et al.  Beyond the single study: function/location metanalysis in cognitive neuroimaging , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[10]  M E Meyerand,et al.  Combining independent component analysis and correlation analysis to probe interregional connectivity in fMRI task activation datasets. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[11]  P. Fox,et al.  Metaanalytic connectivity modeling: Delineating the functional connectivity of the human amygdala , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Peter T. Fox,et al.  Imaging human intra‐cerebral connectivity by PET during TMS , 1997, Neuroreport.

[13]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Modeling motor connectivity using TMS/PET and structural equation modeling , 2008, NeuroImage.

[14]  Andreas Bartels,et al.  Brain dynamics during natural viewing conditions—A new guide for mapping connectivity in vivo , 2005, NeuroImage.

[15]  Franco Cauda,et al.  Different functions in the cingulate cortex, a meta-analytic connectivity modeling study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[16]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation during Positron Emission Tomography: A New Method for Studying Connectivity of the Human Cerebral Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  R. Poldrack Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  J. Xiong,et al.  Detecting functional connectivity in the resting brain: a comparison between ICA and CCA. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[19]  Jack L. Lancaster,et al.  Talairach space as a tool for intersubject standardization in the brain , 2000 .

[20]  Jessica A. Turner,et al.  Behavioral Interpretations of Intrinsic Connectivity Networks , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[22]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  A method for functional network connectivity among spatially independent resting-state components in schizophrenia , 2008, NeuroImage.

[23]  R. Poldrack Inferring Mental States from Neuroimaging Data: From Reverse Inference to Large-Scale Decoding , 2011, Neuron.

[24]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[25]  J L Lancaster,et al.  Automated Talairach Atlas labels for functional brain mapping , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[26]  Michael J. Martinez,et al.  Bias between MNI and Talairach coordinates analyzed using the ICBM‐152 brain template , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[27]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Brain templates and atlases , 2012, NeuroImage.

[28]  C. Capaday,et al.  Intensity modulation of TMS‐induced cortical excitation: Primary motor cortex , 2006, Human brain mapping.