The Erratic Path of the Low-Carbon Transition in China: Evolution of Solar Pv Policy

The last twenty years have seen the growth of both solar PV manufacturing capacity and deployment in China, yet this growth has followed a very erratic path. This study applies the concept of socio-technical regime to identify factors which have made this path so erratic. We examine four stages in China's solar PV policy from mid-1990s to 2013 and show that each is characterized by different combinations of policy program. These changes in government policy and in the resultant trajectory of the solar PV sector are attributed to three main sets of variables. The most important of these are events which shape the wider policy priorities of China's government. Secondary factors include the government's poor management of the policy interaction between the domestic solar PV manufacturing industry and the deployment of solar PV across the country, as well as policy learning within government. The general lesson from this study is that the development path of a single element of a national strategy for the low-carbon transition is likely to be erratic, subject as it is to a range of political and economic forces, and to experimentation and learning.

[1]  Weidong Liu,et al.  Geographical interdependence, international trade and economic dynamics: The Chinese and German solar energy industries , 2013 .

[2]  Alex Niez Comparative Study on Rural Electrification Policies in Emerging Economies: Keys to successful policies , 2010 .

[3]  Zhixin Wang,et al.  Solar energy development in China--A review , 2010 .

[4]  Felix Groba,et al.  Chinese Renewable Energy Technology Exports: The Role of Policy, Innovation and Markets , 2015 .

[5]  M. E. Wolf Historic development of photovoltaic power generation , 1974 .

[6]  Hideaki Shiroyama,et al.  Development of photovoltaic power generation in China: A transition perspective , 2013 .

[7]  Subhes C. Bhattacharyya,et al.  The Chinese electricity access model for rural electrification: Approach, experience and lessons for others. , 2012 .

[8]  Zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde Renewable Energy Policy in Remote Rural Areas of Western China: Implementation and Socio-economic Benefits , 2010 .

[9]  Yongxiu He,et al.  Analysis on the development and policy of solar PV power in China , 2013 .

[10]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions , 2005 .

[11]  Jialu Liu,et al.  Understanding China's renewable energy technology exports ☆ , 2013 .

[12]  Yongxiu He,et al.  Interactions between Renewable Energy Policy and Renewable Energy Industrial Policy: A Critical Analysis of China's Policy Approach to Renewable Energies’ , 2013 .

[13]  Hisham Zerriffi,et al.  Rural Electrification in China 1950-2004 , 2006 .

[14]  C. P. Andrews-Speed The Governance of Energy in China: Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy , 2012 .

[15]  Catherine Mitchell,et al.  The political economy of sustainable energy , 2007 .

[16]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[17]  R. Stott,et al.  The World Bank , 2008, Annals of tropical medicine and parasitology.

[18]  K. Neuhoff,et al.  Survey of Photovoltaic Industry and Policy in Germany and China , 2011 .

[19]  Zhixin Wang,et al.  The development and application practice of wind–solar energy hybrid generation systems in China , 2009 .

[20]  K. Lee Industrial evolution and national institutional advantage A comparative analysis of the photovoltaic industry in Germany, China and South Korea , 2012 .

[21]  Ruirui Zhao,et al.  Present status and prospects of photovoltaic market in China , 2011 .

[22]  P. Hall Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain , 1993 .

[23]  Chian-Woei Shyu,et al.  Rural electrification program with renewable energy sources: An analysis of China’s Township Electrification Program , 2012 .