The utilization of the double focal transformation for sparse data representation and data reconstruction

In many cases, seismic measurements are coarsely sampled in at least one dimension. This leads to aliasing artefacts and therefore to problems in the subsequent processing steps. To avoid this, seismic data reconstruction can be applied in advance. The success and reliability of reconstruction methods are dependent on the assumptions they make on the data. In many cases, wavefields are assumed to (locally) have a linear space–time behaviour. However, field data are usually complex, with strongly curved events. Therefore, in this paper, we propose the double focal transformation as an efficient way for complex data reconstruction. Hereby, wavefield propagation is formulated as a transformation, where one-way propagation operators are used as its basis functions. These wavefield operators can be based on a macro velocity model, which allows our method to use prior information in order to make the data decomposition more effective. The basic principle of the double focal transformation is to focus seismic energy along source and receiver coordinates simultaneously. The seismic data are represented by a number of localized events in the focal domain, whereas aliasing noise spreads out. By imposing a sparse solution in the focal domain, aliasing noise is suppressed, and data reconstruction beyond aliasing is achieved. To facilitate the process, only a few effective depth levels need to be included, preferably along the major boundaries in the data, from which the propagation operators can be calculated. Results on 2D and 3D synthetic data illustrate the method's virtues. Furthermore, seismic data reconstruction on a 2D field dataset with gaps and aliased source spacing demonstrates the strength of the double focal transformation, particularly for near-offset reflections with strong curvature and for diffractions.

[1]  Eric Verschuur,et al.  Data Reconstruction via Sparse Double Focal Transformation: An Overview , 2012, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[2]  Eric Verschuur,et al.  4D reconstruction of wide azimuth (WAZ) data using sparse inversion of hybrid Radon transforms , 2012 .

[3]  Mauricio D. Sacchi,et al.  Fourier Reconstruction of Nonuniformly Sampled, Aliased Seismic Data , 2022 .

[4]  Bill Dragoset A practical approach to surface multiple attenuation , 1999 .

[5]  Mauricio D. Sacchi,et al.  Accurate interpolation with high-resolution time-variant Radon transforms , 2002 .

[6]  A. J. Van Wijngaarden Imaging and characterization of angle-dependent seismic reflection data. , 1998 .

[7]  A. J. Berkhout,et al.  Angle-dependent reflectivity by means of prestack migration , 1990 .

[8]  A. Berkhout,et al.  Applied Seismic Wave Theory , 1987 .

[9]  A. J. Berkhout,et al.  Efficient 2D and 3D shot record redatuming , 1989 .

[10]  Gerrit Blacquière,et al.  An r-based overview of the WRW concept , 2009 .

[11]  Daniel Trad,et al.  Five-dimensional interpolation: Recovering from acquisition constraints , 2009 .

[12]  Umberto Spagnolini,et al.  3‐D shot continuation operator , 1996 .

[13]  A. J. Berkhout,et al.  Seismic processing in the inverse data space , 2006 .

[14]  G. Schuster,et al.  Least-squares migration of incomplete reflection data , 1999 .

[15]  F. Herrmann,et al.  Nonequispaced curvelet transform for seismic data reconstruction: A sparsity-promoting approach , 2010 .

[16]  S. Deregowski,et al.  What is DMO , 1986 .

[17]  Mauricio D. Sacchi,et al.  Latest views of the sparse Radon transform , 2003 .

[18]  F. Herrmann,et al.  Simply denoise: Wavefield reconstruction via jittered undersampling , 2008 .

[19]  Philippe Herrmann,et al.  De-aliased, High-Resolution Radon Transforms , 2000 .

[20]  A. Gisolf,et al.  Fourier reconstruction with sparse inversion , 2007 .

[21]  Daniel Trad,et al.  Interpolation and multiple attenuation with migration operators , 2003 .

[22]  A. Kontakis,et al.  Deblending Via a Hybrid Focal and Linear Radon Transform , 2015 .

[24]  A. Kontakis,et al.  Deblending Via Sparsity-constrained Inversion in the Focal Domain , 2014 .

[25]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Focal transformation, an imaging concept for signal restoration and noise removal , 2006 .

[26]  H. Kuehl Least-squares wave-equation migration/inversion , 2002 .

[27]  P. M. van den Berg,et al.  Seismic applications of acoustic reciprocity , 1993 .

[28]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  High Resolution Double Focal Transformation And Its Application to Data Reconstruction , 2010 .

[29]  Nizar Chemingui,et al.  Azimuth moveout for 3-D prestack imaging , 1998 .

[30]  Peter W. Cary,et al.  Common-offset-vector Gathers: an Alternative to Cross-spreads For Wide-azimuth 3-D Surveys , 1999 .

[31]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Restoration of missing offsets by parabolic Radon transform1 , 1995 .

[32]  Mostafa Naghizadeh,et al.  Seismic data interpolation and denoising in the frequency-wavenumber domain , 2012 .

[33]  A. J. Berkhout Pushing the limits of seismic imaging, Part II: Integration of prestack migration, velocity estimation, and AVO analysis , 1997 .

[34]  Juefu Wang,et al.  Seismic data interpolation by greedy local Radon transform , 2010 .

[35]  Umberto Spagnolini,et al.  2-D continuation operators and their applications , 1996 .

[36]  H. Kutscha The double focal transformation and its application to data reconstruction , 2012 .

[38]  Andreas Klaedtke,et al.  Anti-alias Anti-leakage Fourier Transform , 2009 .

[39]  Dries Gisolf The Principles of Quantitative Acoustical Imaging , 2010 .

[40]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Antileakage Fourier transform for seismic data regularization , 2005 .

[41]  R. Romijn Reconstruction of seismic data using the Focal Transformation , 2004 .

[42]  Mauricio D. Sacchi,et al.  Beyond alias hierarchical scale curvelet interpolation of regularly and irregularly sampled seismic data , 2010 .

[43]  C. O. H. Hindriks,et al.  Reconstruction of band‐limited signals, irregularly sampled along one spatial direction , 1999 .

[44]  Michael P. Friedlander,et al.  Probing the Pareto Frontier for Basis Pursuit Solutions , 2008, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[45]  A. Gisolf,et al.  Fourier reconstruction of marine-streamer data in four spatial coordinates , 2006 .