Using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to generate an initial plan check checklist for improved safety in radiation treatment

Abstract Purpose To apply failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) to generate an effective and efficient initial physics plan checklist. Methods A team of physicists, dosimetrists, and therapists was setup to reconstruct the workflow processes involved in the generation of a treatment plan beginning from simulation. The team then identified possible failure modes in each of the processes. For each failure mode, the severity (S), frequency of occurrence (O), and the probability of detection (D) was assigned a value and the risk priority number (RPN) was calculated. The values assigned were based on TG 100. Prior to assigning a value, the team discussed the values in the scoring system to minimize randomness in scoring. A local database of errors was used to help guide the scoring of frequency. Results Twenty‐seven process steps and 50 possible failure modes were identified starting from simulation to the final approved plan ready for treatment at the machine. Any failure mode that scored an average RPN value of 20 or greater was deemed “eligible” to be placed on the second checklist. In addition, any failure mode with a severity score value of 4 or greater was also considered for inclusion in the checklist. As a by‐product of this procedure, safety improvement methods such as automation and standardization of certain processes (e.g., dose constraint checking, check tools), removal of manual transcription of treatment‐related information as well as staff education were implemented, although this was not the team's original objective. Prior to the implementation of the new FMEA‐based checklist, an in‐service for all the second checkers was organized to ensure further standardization of the process. Conclusion The FMEA proved to be a valuable tool for identifying vulnerabilities in our workflow and processes in generating a treatment plan and subsequently a new, more effective initial plan checklist was created.

[1]  S Mutic,et al.  A framework for automated contour quality assurance in radiation therapy including adaptive techniques , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Perry B. Johnson,et al.  Strategies for Effective Physics Plan and Chart Review in Radiation Therapy: Report of AAPM Task Group 275. , 2020, Medical physics.

[3]  Louise H Warrick,et al.  Linking quality assurance to performance improvement to produce a high reliability organization. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  G. Barbanti-Bròdano,et al.  Spinal surgery complications: an unsolved problem—Is the World Health Organization Safety Surgical Checklist an useful tool to reduce them? , 2019, European Spine Journal.

[5]  Yuanshui Zheng,et al.  Minimizing treatment planning errors in proton therapy using failure mode and effects analysis. , 2016, Medical physics.

[6]  Shada Wadi-Ramahi,et al.  Failure modes and effects analysis in image-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy: Quality control optimization to reduce errors in treatment volume. , 2016, Brachytherapy.

[7]  D L McShan,et al.  The impact of treatment complexity and computer-control delivery technology on treatment delivery errors. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Thomas G. Purdie,et al.  Groupwise Conditional Random Forests for Automatic Shape Classification and Contour Quality Assessment in Radiotherapy Planning , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  The report of Task Group 100 of the AAPM: Application of risk analysis methods to radiation therapy quality management. , 2016, Medical physics.

[10]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  Quality control quantification (QCQ): a tool to measure the value of quality control checks in radiation oncology. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  E. Brown,et al.  Failure mode and effects analysis in a paperless radiotherapy department , 2018, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.

[12]  Eric C Ford,et al.  Evaluation of safety in a radiation oncology setting using failure mode and effects analysis. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  B. Thomadsen Critique of traditional quality assurance paradigm. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Benedick A Fraass,et al.  A method for evaluating quality assurance needs in radiation therapy. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Quality assurance of radiation therapy planning systems: current status and remaining challenges. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  E. Grigg Smarter Clinical Checklists: How to Minimize Checklist Fatigue and Maximize Clinician Performance. , 2015, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[17]  A. Darzi,et al.  Surgical Checklist Implementation Project: The Impact of Variable WHO Checklist Compliance on Risk-adjusted Clinical Outcomes After National Implementation: A Longitudinal Study. , 2016, Annals of surgery.

[18]  Lizabeth D Martin,et al.  Outcomes of a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis for medication errors in pediatric anesthesia , 2017, Paediatric anaesthesia.

[19]  P. Pronovost,et al.  Medical Physics Practice Guideline 4.a: Development, implementation, use and maintenance of safety checklists , 2015, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[20]  C. Rowbottom,et al.  AutoLock: a semiautomated system for radiotherapy treatment plan quality control , 2015, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[21]  Eric C Ford,et al.  How safe is safe? Risk in radiotherapy. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  Juan López-Tarjuelo,et al.  Failure mode and effect analysis oriented to risk-reduction interventions in intraoperative electron radiation therapy: the specific impact of patient transportation, automation, and treatment planning availability. , 2014, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[23]  Benedick A Fraass,et al.  Errors in radiotherapy: motivation for development of new radiotherapy quality assurance paradigms. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  K. Younge,et al.  Practical implementation of failure mode and effects analysis for safety and efficiency in stereotactic radiosurgery. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.