A decision support system and rule-based algorithm to augment the human interpretation of the 12-lead electrocardiogram.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Daniel Guldenring | Fabio Badilini | Dewar D Finlay | Raymond R Bond | Stephen J Leslie | Guido Libretti | Andrew W Cairns | Aaron J Peace | F. Badilini | D. Finlay | R. Bond | A. Cairns | D. Guldenring | Guido Libretti | A. Peace | S. Leslie
[1] Dewar D. Finlay,et al. An annotation driven rule-based algorithm for suggesting multiple 12-lead ECG interpretations , 2016, 2016 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC).
[2] R R Bond,et al. Assessing computerized eye tracking technology for gaining insight into expert interpretation of the 12-lead electrocardiogram: an objective quantitative approach. , 2014, Journal of electrocardiology.
[3] J. L. Willems,et al. The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.
[4] N. Estes,et al. Computerized Interpretation of ECGs Supplement Not a Substitute , 2013 .
[5] Raymond R. Bond,et al. A computer-human interaction model to improve the diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making during 12-lead electrocardiogram interpretation , 2016, J. Biomed. Informatics.
[6] S. Goodacre,et al. Do computer generated ECG reports improve interpretation by accident and emergency senior house officers? , 2001, Postgraduate medical journal.
[7] Raymond R. Bond,et al. The role of computerized diagnostic proposals in the interpretation of the 12-lead electrocardiogram by cardiology and non-cardiology fellows , 2017, Int. J. Medical Informatics.
[8] M. Dinh,et al. The effect of clinical history on accuracy of electrocardiograph interpretation among doctors working in emergency departments , 2012, The Medical journal of Australia.
[9] Daniel Guldenring,et al. Data analysis of diagnostic accuracies in 12-lead electrocardiogram interpretation by junior medical fellows. , 2015, Journal of electrocardiology.
[10] John E Madias,et al. The 13th multiuse ECG lead: shouldn't we use it more often, and on the same hard copy or computer screen, as the other 12 leads? , 2004, Journal of electrocardiology.
[11] R. R. Bond,et al. Eye tracking in the assessment of electrocardiogram interpretation techniques , 2012, 2012 Computing in Cardiology.
[12] Raymond Bond,et al. An evaluation of eye tracking technology in the assessment of 12 lead electrocardiography interpretation. , 2014, Journal of electrocardiology.
[13] Anique B. H. de Bruin,et al. Checklists improve experts’ diagnostic decisions , 2013, Medical education.
[14] Zlatko Fras,et al. ESC core curriculum for the general cardiologist (2013). , 2013, European heart journal.
[15] Douglas B. Fridsma,et al. Research Paper: Computer Decision Support as a Source of Interpretation Error: The Case of Electrocardiograms , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..
[16] A. Shah,et al. Errors in the computerized electrocardiogram interpretation of cardiac rhythm. , 2007, Journal of electrocardiology.
[17] Mark R. Wilson,et al. Exploring the Impact of Expertise, Clinical History, and Visual Search on Electrocardiogram Interpretation , 2014, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[18] Frank Bogun,et al. Misdiagnosis of atrial fibrillation and its clinical consequences. , 2004, The American journal of medicine.
[19] Daniel Guldenring,et al. Using computerised interactive response technology to assess electrocardiographers and for aggregating diagnoses. , 2015, Journal of electrocardiology.