Predicting the synaptic information efficacy in cortical layer 5 pyramidal neurons using a minimal integrate-and-fire model

Synaptic information efficacy (SIE) is a statistical measure to quantify the efficacy of a synapse. It measures how much information is gained, on the average, about the output spike train of a postsynaptic neuron if the input spike train is known. It is a particularly appropriate measure for assessing the input–output relationship of neurons receiving dynamic stimuli. Here, we compare the SIE of simulated synaptic inputs measured experimentally in layer 5 cortical pyramidal neurons in vitro with the SIE computed from a minimal model constructed to fit the recorded data. We show that even with a simple model that is far from perfect in predicting the precise timing of the output spikes of the real neuron, the SIE can still be accurately predicted. This arises from the ability of the model to predict output spikes influenced by the input more accurately than those driven by the background current. This indicates that in this context, some spikes may be more important than others. Lastly we demonstrate another aspect where using mutual information could be beneficial in evaluating the quality of a model, by measuring the mutual information between the model’s output and the neuron’s output. The SIE, thus, could be a useful tool for assessing the quality of models of single neurons in preserving input–output relationship, a property that becomes crucial when we start connecting these reduced models to construct complex realistic neuronal networks.

[1]  Bartlett W. Mel,et al.  Computational subunits in thin dendrites of pyramidal cells , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  H. Markram,et al.  Physiology and anatomy of synaptic connections between thick tufted pyramidal neurones in the developing rat neocortex. , 1997, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  Reduction of the Hodgkin-Huxley Equations to a Single-Variable Threshold Model , 1997, Neural Computation.

[4]  M. Häusser,et al.  Dendritic coincidence detection of EPSPs and action potentials , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Adrienne L. Fairhall,et al.  Computation in a Single Neuron: Hodgkin and Huxley Revisited , 2002, Neural Computation.

[6]  W. Senn,et al.  Neocortical pyramidal cells respond as integrate-and-fire neurons to in vivo-like input currents. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Firing Rate of the Noisy Quadratic Integrate-and-Fire Neuron , 2003, Neural Computation.

[8]  Stephen R. Williams,et al.  Mechanisms and consequences of action potential burst firing in rat neocortical pyramidal neurons , 1999, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Calcium action potentials restricted to distal apical dendrites of rat neocortical pyramidal neurons , 1997, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  Yun Gao,et al.  Estimating the Entropy of Binary Time Series: Methodology, Some Theory and a Simulation Study , 2008, Entropy.

[11]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  Predicting spike timing of neocortical pyramidal neurons by simple threshold models , 2006, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[12]  D. Hansel,et al.  How Spike Generation Mechanisms Determine the Neuronal Response to Fluctuating Inputs , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  R. Douglas,et al.  The role of synapses in cortical computation , 1996, Journal of neurocytology.

[14]  E E Fetz,et al.  Relation between shapes of post‐synaptic potentials and changes in firing probability of cat motoneurones , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  W. Senn,et al.  Top-down dendritic input increases the gain of layer 5 pyramidal neurons. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  M. Häusser,et al.  Estimating the Time Course of the Excitatory Synaptic Conductance in Neocortical Pyramidal Cells Using a Novel Voltage Jump Method , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  J. Nadal,et al.  What can we learn from synaptic weight distributions? , 2007, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  Idan Segev,et al.  The information efficacy of a synapse , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  Judit K. Makara,et al.  Compartmentalized dendritic plasticity and input feature storage in neurons , 2008, Nature.

[20]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Reliability of spike timing in neocortical neurons. , 1995, Science.

[21]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[22]  L. Abbott,et al.  Neural network dynamics. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[23]  B. Sakmann,et al.  A new cellular mechanism for coupling inputs arriving at different cortical layers , 1999, Nature.

[24]  A. Thomson,et al.  Functional Maps of Neocortical Local Circuitry , 2007, Front. Neurosci..

[25]  Frans M. J. Willems,et al.  The context-tree weighting method: basic properties , 1995, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[26]  Frances S Chance Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for characterizing synaptic efficacy. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Jonathon Shlens,et al.  Estimating Entropy Rates with Bayesian Confidence Intervals , 2005, Neural Computation.

[28]  Noam Peled,et al.  Constraining compartmental models using multiple voltage recordings and genetic algorithms. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  A. Friedman,et al.  Stepwise repolarization from Ca2+ plateaus in neocortical pyramidal cells: evidence for nonhomogeneous distribution of HVA Ca2+ channels in dendrites , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[30]  W. Gerstner,et al.  Dynamic I-V curves are reliable predictors of naturalistic pyramidal-neuron voltage traces. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  M. London,et al.  Dendritic computation. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[32]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  Noise and the PSTH Response to Current Transients: I. General Theory and Application to the Integrate-and-Fire Neuron , 2001, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[33]  Bartlett W. Mel,et al.  Dendrites: bug or feature? , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.