Probabilistic Expert Systems for Forensic Inference from Genetic Markers

We present a number of real and fictitious examples in illustration of a new approach to analysing complex cases of forensic identification inference. This is effected by careful restructuring of the relevant pedigrees as a Probabilistic Expert System. Existing software can then be used to perform the required inferential calculations. Specific complications which are readily handled by this approach include missing data on one or more relevant individuals, and genetic mutation. The method is particularly valuable for disputed paternity cases, but applies also to certain criminal cases.

[1]  R. Elston,et al.  A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data. , 1971, Human heredity.

[2]  Probability functions on complex pedigrees , 1978 .

[3]  A. Dawid.  Conditional Independence in Statistical Theory , 1979 .

[4]  J. Weber,et al.  Abundant class of human DNA polymorphisms which can be typed using the polymerase chain reaction. , 1989, American journal of human genetics.

[5]  A. P. Dawid,et al.  Applications of a general propagation algorithm for probabilistic expert systems , 1992 .

[6]  David J. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Bayesian analysis in expert systems , 1993 .

[7]  N. Freimer,et al.  Allele frequencies at microsatellite loci: the stepwise mutation model revisited. , 1993, Genetics.

[8]  P. Gill,et al.  Identification of the remains of the Romanov family by DNA analysis , 1994, Nature Genetics.

[9]  Uffe Kjærulff,et al.  Blocking Gibbs sampling in very large probabilistic expert systems , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  Peter Green,et al.  Markov chain Monte Carlo in Practice , 1996 .

[11]  P. Ivanov,et al.  Mitochondrial DNA sequence heteroplasmy in the Grand Duke of Russia Georgij Romanov establishes the authenticity of the remains of Tsar Nicholas II , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[12]  A. P. Dawid,et al.  Coherent Analysis of Forensic Identification Evidence , 1996 .

[13]  Ian W. Evett,et al.  Bayesian Analysis of DNA Profiling Data in Forensic Identification Applications , 1997 .

[14]  T Egeland,et al.  A computerised method for calculating the probability of pedigrees from genetic data. , 1997, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[15]  A. Dawid,et al.  Forensic identification with imperfect evidence , 1998 .

[16]  B Brinkmann,et al.  Mutation rate in human microsatellites: influence of the structure and length of the tandem repeat. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[17]  Kathryn Roeder,et al.  Measuring heterogeneity in forensic databases using hierarchical Bayes models , 1998 .

[18]  A. P. Dawid,et al.  Hierarchical models for DNA profiling using heterogeneous databases , 1999 .

[19]  David J. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Probabilistic Networks and Expert Systems , 1999, Information Science and Statistics.

[20]  Elizabeth A. Thompson,et al.  MCMC Estimation of Multi‐locus Genome Sharing and Multipoint Gene Location Scores , 2000 .

[21]  T Egeland,et al.  Beyond traditional paternity and identification cases. Selecting the most probable pedigree. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[22]  Ranajit Chakraborty,et al.  Interpreting DNA evidence , 2000 .

[23]  Robert G. Cowell,et al.  FINEX: Forensic Identification by Network Expert Systems , 2001 .

[24]  A. Dawid,et al.  Non-fatherhood or mutation? A probabilistic approach to parental exclusion in paternity testing. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[25]  A. P. Dawid.  Bayes's theorem and weighing evidence by juries , 2002 .