Basic estimation-prediction techniques for Covid-19, and a prediction for Stockholm

An important task during the current Covid-19 pandemic is to predict the remainder of the epidemic, both without preventive measures and with. In the current paper we address this question using a simple estimation-prediction method. The input is the observed initial doubling time and a known value of R0. The simple General epidemic model is then fitted, and time calibration to calendar time is done using the observed number of case fatalities, together with estimates of the time between infection to death and the infection fatality risk. Finally, predictions are made assuming no change of behaviour, as well as for the situation where preventive measures are put in place at one specific time-point. The overall effect of the preventive measures is assumed to be known, or else estimated from the observed increased doubling time after preventive measures are put in place. The predictions are highly sensitive to the doubling times without and with preventive measures, sensitive to R0, but less sensitive to the estimates used for time-calibration: observed number of case fatalities, typical time between infection and death, and the infection fatality risk. The method is applied to the urban area of Stockholm, and predictions show that the peak of infections appear in mid-April and infections start settling in May.

[1]  M. Lipsitch,et al.  How generation intervals shape the relationship between growth rates and reproductive numbers , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Jing Zhao,et al.  Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Ruiyun Li,et al.  Substantial undocumented infection facilitates the rapid dissemination of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) , 2020, Science.

[4]  Estimating clinical severity of COVID-19 from the transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China , 2020, Nature Medicine.

[5]  Tom Britton,et al.  Estimation in emerging epidemics: biases and remedies , 2018, Journal of the Royal Society Interface.

[6]  J. Rocklöv,et al.  COVID-19 healthcare demand and mortality in Sweden in response to non-pharmaceutical mitigation and suppression scenarios , 2020, International journal of epidemiology.

[7]  Jessica T Davis,et al.  The effect of travel restrictions on the spread of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak , 2020, Science.

[8]  C. Whittaker,et al.  Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand , 2020 .

[9]  Joacim Rocklov,et al.  Covid-19 health care demand and mortality in Sweden in response to non-pharmaceutical (NPIs) mitigation and suppression scenarios , 2020, medRxiv.

[10]  S. Bhatt,et al.  Report 13: Estimating the number of infections and the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in 11 European countries , 2020 .

[11]  Philip D. O'Neill,et al.  Mathematical Tools for Understanding Infectious Disease Dynamics by O. Diekmann, H. Heesterbeek and T. Britton Princeton University Press, pp. 516, ISBN 978-0-691-15539-5 , 2013 .

[12]  Odo Diekmann,et al.  Mathematical Tools for Understanding Infectious Disease Dynamics , 2012 .

[13]  Tom Britton,et al.  Basic prediction methodology for covid-19: estimation and sensitivity considerations , 2020, medRxiv.