Revealing protein structures: a new method for mapping antibody epitopes

A recent idea for determining the three-dimensional structure of a protein uses antibody recognition of surface structure and random peptide libraries to map antibody epitope combining sites. Antibodies that bind to the surface of the protein of interest can be used as "witnesses" to report the structure of the protein as follows: Proteins are composed of linear polypeptide chains that come together in complex spatial folding patterns to create the native protein structures and these folded structures form the binding sites for the antibodies. Short amino acid probe sequences, which bind to the active region of each antibody, can be selected from random sequence peptide libraries. These probe sequences can often be aligned to discontinuous regions of the one-dimensional target sequence of a protein. Such alignments indicate how pieces of the protein sequence must be folded together in space and thus provide valuable long-range constraints for solving the overall 3-D structure. This new approach is applicable to the very large number of proteins that are refractory to current approaches to structure determination and has the advantage of requiring very small amounts of the target protein. The binding site of an antibody is a surface, not just a linear sequence, so the epitope mapping alignment problem is outside the scope of classical string alignment algorithms, such as Smith-Waterman. We formalize the alignment problem that is at the heart of this new approach, prove that the epitope mapping alignment problem is NP-complete, and give some initial results using a branch-and-bound algorithm to map two real-life cases.

[1]  E A Dratz,et al.  Actin surface structure revealed by antibody imprints: Evaluation of phage‐display analysis of anti‐actin antibodies , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[2]  F. Franceschi,et al.  Crystallization of Biological Macromolecules , 1997 .

[3]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Atomic structure of the actin: DNase I complex , 1990, Nature.

[4]  D C Teller,et al.  Advances in determination of a high-resolution three-dimensional structure of rhodopsin, a model of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). , 2001, Biochemistry.

[5]  K. Palczewski,et al.  Crystal Structure of Rhodopsin: A G‐Protein‐Coupled Receptor , 2002, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[6]  P Argos,et al.  Applying experimental data to protein fold prediction with the genetic algorithm. , 1997, Protein engineering.

[7]  Carlos F. Barbas,et al.  Phage display: a Laboratory manual , 2014 .

[8]  J. Claverie,et al.  What If There Are Only 30,000 Human Genes? , 2001, Science.

[9]  H. Kalbitzer,et al.  Protein NMR Spectroscopy. Principles and Practice , 1997 .

[10]  E. Padlan,et al.  X-ray crystallography of antibodies. , 1996, Advances in protein chemistry.

[11]  A. Vaheri,et al.  Phage-displayed peptides mimicking the discontinuous neutralization sites of puumala Hantavirus envelope glycoproteins. , 1999, Virology.

[12]  A. Jesaitis,et al.  Filamentous phage display of oligopeptide libraries. , 1996, Analytical biochemistry.

[13]  J. Wess G‐protein‐coupled receptors: molecular mechanisms involved in receptor activation and selectivity of G‐protein recognition , 1997, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[14]  R. Maroun,et al.  Combining phage display and molecular modeling to map the epitope of a neutralizing antitoxin antibody. , 2000, European journal of biochemistry.

[15]  J. Moult,et al.  Biological function made crystal clear - annotation of hypothetical proteins via structural genomics. , 2000, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[16]  Algirdas J. Jesaitis,et al.  Antibody Imprint of a Membrane Protein Surface , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  D. Baker,et al.  Prospects for ab initio protein structural genomics. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  S. Sidhu,et al.  Phage display for selection of novel binding peptides. , 2000, Methods in enzymology.

[19]  A. Sali,et al.  Protein Structure Prediction and Structural Genomics , 2001, Science.

[20]  H. Michel,et al.  Crystallization of membrane proteins. , 1983, Current opinion in structural biology.

[21]  J. Gutkind,et al.  G-protein-coupled receptors and signaling networks: emerging paradigms. , 2001, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[22]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[23]  B. A. Jameson,et al.  The antigenic index: a novel algorithm for predicting antigenic determinants , 1988, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[24]  P. Argos,et al.  Suggestions for "safe" residue substitutions in site-directed mutagenesis. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  G M Clore,et al.  Exploring the limits of precision and accuracy of protein structures determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  C. Chothia,et al.  The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  M S Waterman,et al.  Identification of common molecular subsequences. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  H R Hoogenboom,et al.  Antibody phage display technology and its applications. , 1998, Immunotechnology : an international journal of immunological engineering.

[29]  Cheryl H. Arrowsmith,et al.  Protein production: feeding the crystallographers and NMR spectroscopists , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.