Structural encoding processes contribute to individual differences in face and object cognition: Inferences from psychometric test performance and event-related brain potentials

[1]  O. Wilhelm,et al.  Experimental strategies in multivariate research , 2005 .

[2]  Martin Eimer,et al.  The Cognitive and Neural Basis of Developmental Prosopagnosia , 2017, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  W. Sommer,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Individual Differences in Perceiving and Recognizing Faces — One Element of Social Cognition , 2010 .

[4]  T Yamamoto,et al.  Selective impairment of facial recognition due to a haematoma restricted to the right fusiform and lateral occipital region , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[5]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[6]  Yue-jia Luo,et al.  Attention modulations on the perception of social hierarchy at distinct temporal stages: An electrophysiological investigation , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  J. Carroll.  Human Cognitive Abilities-a sur-vey of factor-analytic studies , 1993 .

[9]  C. Jacques,et al.  The initial representation of individual faces in the right occipito-temporal cortex is holistic: electrophysiological evidence from the composite face illusion. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[10]  Mark A. Williams,et al.  Investigating the Features of the M170 in Congenital Prosopagnosia , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[11]  Elimination of all domain-general hypotheses of prosopagnosia in a single individual: Evidence for an isolated deficit in 2nd order configural face processing , 2004 .

[12]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Normal and abnormal face selectivity of the M170 response in developmental prosopagnosics , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  W. Sommer,et al.  Sex differences in face cognition. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[15]  M. Crommelinck,et al.  Is the N170 for faces cognitively penetrable? Evidence from repetition priming of Mooney faces of familiar and unfamiliar persons. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[16]  Stef van Buuren,et al.  MICE: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R , 2011 .

[17]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Digital filter design for electrophysiological data – a practical approach , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[18]  R. T. Pivik,et al.  Guidelines for the recording and quantitative analysis of electroencephalographic activity in research contexts. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[19]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Too Many Trees to See the Forest: Performance, Event-related Potential, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Manifestations of Integrative Congenital Prosopagnosia , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  R A McCarthy,et al.  Prosopagnosia and structural encoding of faces: evidence from event-related potentials. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[21]  Andrea Hildebrandt,et al.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of individual differences in face cognition: A replication and extension , 2014, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[22]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Analyzing for information, not activation, to exploit high-resolution fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[23]  M. Farah,et al.  What is "special" about face perception? , 1998, Psychological review.

[24]  John W. Tukey,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis. , 1979 .

[25]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Human face recognition ability is specific and highly heritable , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Nigel MacLennan,et al.  Assessment and Analysis , 2017 .

[27]  G. Zelinsky,et al.  Electrocortical and ocular indices of attention to fearful and neutral faces presented under high and low working memory load , 2012, Biological Psychology.

[28]  B. Rossion.  Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[29]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  L. Jonkman,et al.  Effects of concurrent working memory load on distractor and conflict processing in a name-face Stroop task. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[31]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[32]  W. Sommer,et al.  On the specificity of face cognition compared with general cognitive functioning across adult age. , 2011, Psychology and aging.

[33]  Rachel A Robbins,et al.  A Review and Clarification of the Terms “holistic,” “configural,” and “relational” in the Face Perception Literature , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[34]  Clara D. Martin,et al.  Controlling for interstimulus perceptual variance abolishes N170 face selectivity , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  J. Sergent,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[36]  Dorothy V. M. Bishop,et al.  Journal of Neuroscience Methods , 2015 .

[37]  A. Young.  Disorders of Face Perception , 2011 .

[38]  N. Sagiv,et al.  Structural Encoding of Human and Schematic Faces: Holistic and Part-Based Processes , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  Stefanie C. Biehl,et al.  The impact of task relevance and degree of distraction on stimulus processing , 2013, BMC Neuroscience.

[40]  M. Ruz,et al.  Category expectations: A differential modulation of the N170 potential for faces and words , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  P Walla,et al.  Early cortical activation indicates preparation for retrieval of memory for faces: an event-related potential study , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[42]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Oxford Handbook of Face Perception , 2011 .

[43]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  D. Lundqvist,et al.  Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces , 2015 .

[45]  M. Eimer,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of face processing in developmental prosopagnosia: Neuropsychological and neurodevelopmental perspectives , 2012, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[46]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Developmental Prosopagnosia: a Window to Content-specific Face Processing This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Cognitive Neuroscience Edited Developmental Prosopagnosia and Inferences to Functional Organization Investigating the Architecture of Face Processing through Developmental Prosopagnosia , 2022 .

[47]  Galit Yovel,et al.  What can individual differences reveal about face processing? , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[48]  G. Kovács,et al.  The Background of Reduced Face Specificity of N170 in Congenital Prosopagnosia , 2014, PloS one.

[49]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  S. Schweinberger.  Neurophysiological Correlates of Face Recognition , 2011 .

[51]  G D Pearlson,et al.  Determinants of Benton Facial Recognition Test performance in normal adults. , 2001, Neuropsychology.

[52]  Denise A. Minnebusch,et al.  Event‐related potentials reflect heterogeneity of developmental prosopagnosia , 2007, European Journal of Neuroscience.

[53]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[54]  W. Sommer,et al.  Face and object cognition across adult age. , 2013, Psychology and aging.

[55]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[56]  M. Eimer.  The Face-Sensitive N170 Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential , 2011 .

[57]  C. Nelson,et al.  Featural and Configural Face Processing in Adults and Infants: A Behavioral and Electrophysiological Investigation , 2006, Perception.

[58]  W. Sommer,et al.  Structural invariance and age-related performance differences in face cognition. , 2010, Psychology and aging.

[59]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[60]  L. Deouell,et al.  Cognitive Neuroscience: Selective visual streaming in face recognition: evidence from developmental prosopagnosia , 1999 .

[61]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170 , 2008, NeuroImage.

[62]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Individual Differences in Face Cognition: Brain–Behavior Relationships , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[63]  Yaoda Xu.  Revisiting the role of the fusiform face area in visual expertise. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[64]  D. Pitcher,et al.  The role of the occipital face area in the cortical face perception network , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[65]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[66]  Andrea Hildebrandt,et al.  Measuring the speed of recognising facially expressed emotions , 2012, Cognition & emotion.

[67]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[68]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[69]  D. Jeffreys.  Evoked Potential Studies of Face and Object Processing , 1996 .

[70]  M. Eimer.  Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[71]  Irene Daum,et al.  Event-related potentials reflect impaired face recognition in patients with congenital prosopagnosia , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[72]  S. Bentin,et al.  Meaningful processing of meaningless stimuli: The influence of perceptual experience on early visual processing of faces , 2002, Cognition.

[73]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  Role of Features and Second-order Spatial Relations in Face Discrimination, Face Recognition, and Individual Face Skills: Behavioral and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[74]  David E. J. Linden,et al.  Working Memory Load for Faces Modulates P300, N170, and N250r , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[75]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Capturing specific abilities as a window into human individuality: The example of face recognition , 2012, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[76]  R. Yin.  Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[77]  Martin Eimer,et al.  The face-sensitive N170 component in developmental prosopagnosia , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[78]  Beatrice de Gelder,et al.  Impaired face and body perception in developmental prosopagnosia , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.