The Role of Envelope Waveform, Adaptation, and Attacks in Binaural Perception

The human binaural system is capable of using interaural temporal disparities in the fine structure and the envelope of sounds. At high frequencies, the lack of phase-locking to the fine structure restricts the use of interaural timing disparities to envelope cues only. However, it is still unclear which specific envelope waveform features ranging from “classical” onsets (and offsets) to periodic variations such as sinusoidal amplitude modulations play a role as dominant cues. Moreover, a major drawback of these classic features is that a variation of parameters such as overall level, bandwidth, and modulation depth or modulation rate necessarily cause a covariation of “secondary” parameters such as, e.g., attack and decay times, steepness, pause, and hold durations (off-/on-times). Here, psychophysical measurements and auditory model predictions to assess the role of these secondary parameters are presented. Just noticeable differences in the interaural time difference were measured for amplitude-modulated 4-kHz tones with systematic modifications of the envelope. The results indicate that the attack times and the pause times prior to the attack are the most important features. A model including neuronal adaptation prior to the binaural stage is suggested. The model was also tested with the dichotic pip trains from the concurrent study by Siveke et al. presented at this ISH.

[1]  Volker Hohmann,et al.  Lateralization of stimuli with independent fine-structure and envelope-based temporal disparities. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  C. Trahiotis,et al.  Why do transposed stimuli enhance binaural processing?: Interaural envelope correlation vs envelope normalized fourth moment. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  T Dau,et al.  A quantitative model of the "effective" signal processing in the auditory system. I. Model structure. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  S van de Par,et al.  A new approach to comparing binaural masking level differences at low and high frequencies. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Charles S. Watson,et al.  Auditory Processing of Complex Sounds , 1990 .

[6]  A. Kohlrausch,et al.  Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. I. Model structure. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  G. Henning Detectability of interaural delay in high-frequency complex waveforms. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  T. Dau,et al.  Characterizing frequency selectivity for envelope fluctuations. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Andrew J. Byrne,et al.  Discrimination of interaural phase differences in the envelopes of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated 4-kHz tones as a function of modulation depth. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  D. McFadden,et al.  Lateralization of high frequencies based on interaural time differences. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  R. Dye,et al.  Discrimination of interaural envelope delays: the effect of randomizing component starting phase. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Volker Hohmann,et al.  Coding of temporally fluctuating interaural timing disparities in a binaural processing model based on phase differences , 2008, Brain Research.

[14]  Ervin R. Hafter,et al.  Discrimination of interaural delays in complex waveforms: Spectral effects , 1981 .

[15]  B. Delgutte,et al.  Phase locking of auditory-nerve fibers to the envelopes of high-frequency sounds: implications for sound localization. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  J. Nuetzel,et al.  Lateralization of complex waveforms: effects of fine structure, amplitude, and duration. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  W M Hartmann,et al.  Noise power fluctuations and the masking of sine signals. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  R. G. Klumpp,et al.  Some Measurements of Interaural Time Difference Thresholds , 1956 .

[19]  L R Bernstein Auditory processing of interaural timing information: New insights , 2001, Journal of neuroscience research.

[20]  T. Yin,et al.  Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. I. Sensitivity to interaural time differences. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  T. Dau,et al.  A computational model of human auditory signal processing and perception. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Lutz Wiegrebe,et al.  Adjustment of Interaural-Time-Difference Analysis to Sound Level , 2010 .

[23]  Leslie R Bernstein,et al.  Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using "transposed stimuli". , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Kohlrausch,et al.  The influence of carrier level and frequency on modulation and beat-detection thresholds for sinusoidal carriers , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.