Geometric Sets of Low Information Content

In this paper we study language classes defined by nonuniform families of hyperplanes and halfspaces. These are subclasses of P/poly. Upto many-one equivalence these classes are essentially the classes ELT1 (and LT1) of languages accepted by nonuniform families of polynomial size depth-1 circuits with a weighted exact threshold gate at the root (respectively, weighted threshold gate at the root). We investigate the consequences of intractable sets being reducible to sets in ELT1 and LT1. Using the polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming and ideas from the theory of convex polytopes we prove that every disjunctively self-reducible bd-cylinder that is many-one reducible to a set in ELT1 or LT1 is already in P. As a consequence we derive that if a complete set for any class K > ϵ {NP, ModkP, PP, C=P} many-one reduces to a set in ELT1 or LT1 then K >= P. For families of hyperplanes over finite fields, we prove that every Turing self-reducible set that is many-one reducible to a set defined by such a family is in P, and every word-decreasing self-reducible set that is many-one reducible to a set defined by such a family is in NP ∩ co-NP. Furthermore, as an interesting connection, it turns out that several sparse and tally reduction classes are many-one reducible to ELT1 or LT1. Thus, our results concerning reductions to ELT1 and LT1 subsume the strongest existing collapse results concerning reductions of any class K > ϵ {NP, ModkP, PP, C=P} to sparse sets for various reducibilities.

[1]  Osamu Watanabe,et al.  On Polynomial-Time Bounded Truth-Table Reducibility of NP Sets to Sparse Sets , 1991, SIAM J. Comput..

[2]  Hans Heller,et al.  On Relativized Exponential and Probabilistic Complexity Classes , 1986, Inf. Control..

[3]  Narendra Karmarkar,et al.  A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming , 1984, Comb..

[4]  Ker-I Ko On Self-Reducibility and Weak P-Selectivity , 1983, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[5]  Vikraman Arvind,et al.  On Bounded Truth-Table, Conjunctive, and Randomized Reductions to Sparse Sets , 1992, FSTTCS.

[6]  Stephen R. Mahaney Sparse Complete Sets of NP: Solution of a Conjecture of Berman and Hartmanis , 1982, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[7]  Mitsunori Ogihara Polynomial-time membership comparable sets , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE 9th Annual Conference on Structure in Complexity Theory.

[8]  David A. Plaisted The Application of Multivariate Polynomials to Inference Rules and Partial Tests for Unsatisfiability , 1980, SIAM J. Comput..

[9]  Richard J. Lipton,et al.  Some connections between nonuniform and uniform complexity classes , 1980, STOC '80.

[10]  Carsten Lund,et al.  Algebraic methods for interactive proof systems , 1992, JACM.

[11]  Mitsunori Ogihara,et al.  On one query, self-reducible sets , 1991, [1991] Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Structure in Complexity Theory Conference.

[12]  Lane A. Hemaspaandra,et al.  Reductions to Sets of Low Information Content , 1992, Complexity Theory: Current Research.

[13]  Mitsunori Ogihara,et al.  On Sparse Hard Sets for Counting Classes , 1993, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[14]  Alexander Shen IP = SPACE: simplified proof , 1992, JACM.

[15]  R.E. Ladner,et al.  A Comparison of Polynomial Time Reducibilities , 1975, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[16]  Uwe Schöning,et al.  Complexity theory: current research , 1993 .

[17]  U. Hertrampt Relations among MOD-classes , 1990 .

[18]  Frank Stephan,et al.  Approximable Sets , 1995, Inf. Comput..

[19]  José L. Balcázar Self-Reducibility , 1990, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..