Current amplification in an electrostatic trap by soot dendrite growth and fragmentation: Application to soot sensors

Abstract This paper examines the surprisingly large electrical current, nanoamps instead of picoamps, observed when sampling soot aerosol through an electrostatic trap. Aside from its fundamental interest, this phenomenon has potential practical application to motor vehicle on-board diagnostics of particulate matter emissions. The effect originates from the collection of electrically charged particles naturally present in flame produced soot onto the opposing polarity electrodes, but the measured current is ~10 3 times larger than carried by the soot. This amplified current is proportional to the flux of soot particles in steady state, but voltage and flow perturbations substantially magnify the effect. The amplification is not immediate; rather it follows a quiescent period, inversely proportional to soot concentration, which can last hundreds of seconds before climbing rapidly to tens of nanoamps. Concomitantly, large highly charged particles appear at the trap exit, of order 10 μm and carrying tens to hundreds of charges. In situ microscopy reveals that this coincides with the growth of dendritic structures aligned with the electric field, which collapse when it is turned off. As charged soot particles flow through the trap these structures exhibit vigorous apparent motion and detachment from one electrode and deposition onto the other. We present a kinetic model to explain this trap behavior. It is based on the assumption that the dendrites grow to a critical height at which the electric field force exceeds the binding force and the dendrites fragment. These highly charged fragments then deposit on the opposite electrode propagating a chain reaction of dendrite growth, fragmentation, and charge transport that produces the observed current amplification.

[1]  Xingzhong Zhao,et al.  Numerical calculations of field enhancement and field amplification factors for a vertical carbon nanotube in parallel-plate geometry , 2009 .

[2]  T. Ochs,et al.  Particulate Matter Sensor for On Board Diagnostics (OBD) of Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF) , 2010 .

[3]  B. Anderson,et al.  Mapping the Operation of the Miniature Combustion Aerosol Standard (Mini-CAST) Soot Generator , 2014 .

[4]  Robert Henry Hammerle,et al.  Performance of a catalyzed- diesel particulate filter system during soot accumulation and regeneration , 2003 .

[6]  B. DeAngelo,et al.  Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment , 2013 .

[7]  R. Forbes,et al.  Some comments on models for field enhancement. , 2003, Ultramicroscopy.

[8]  Alok Warey,et al.  Performance Characteristics of a New On-Board Engine Exhaust Particulate Matter Sensor , 2005 .

[9]  Enge Wang,et al.  Universal field-emission model for carbon nanotubes on a metal tip , 2002 .

[10]  Reinhard Niessner,et al.  Conductivity for soot sensing: possibilities and limitations. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[11]  Alok Warey,et al.  A New Sensor for On-Board Detection of Particulate Carbon Mass Emissions from Engines , 2004 .

[12]  Zhen Huang,et al.  Review of the state-of-the-art of exhaust particulate filter technology in internal combustion engines. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[13]  M. Maricq,et al.  On the electrical charge of motor vehicle exhaust particles , 2006 .

[14]  M. Maricq,et al.  The effective density and fractal dimension of soot particles from premixed flames and motor vehicle exhaust , 2004 .

[15]  M. Maricq Thermal equilibration of soot charge distributions by coagulation , 2008 .

[16]  Nick Collings,et al.  The effective density and fractal dimension of particles emitted from a light-duty diesel vehicle with a diesel oxidation catalyst , 2007 .

[17]  Klaus Allmendinger,et al.  Comparison of an On-Board, Real-Time Electronic PM Sensor with Laboratory Instruments Using a 2009 Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicle , 2011 .

[18]  M. L. Laucks,et al.  Aerosol Technology Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles , 2000 .

[19]  Joakim Pagels,et al.  A Potential Soot Mass Determination Method from Resistivity Measurement of Thermophoretically Deposited Soot , 2011 .