Effect of pulp properties, drying technology, and sustainability on bath tissue performance and shelf price

The relationship between the types of pulp, the tissue making technologies, and shelf price of bath tissue was evaluated for the North American market. Twenty-four market tissue samples (representing approximately 80% of the current market offering) were sourced and analyzed along with their nationwide price information. Pulp composition, drying technologies, market share, sustainability advertising, and tissue properties were evaluated. Tissue properties, including softness, ball burst strength, water absorbency, density, tensile strength, and tensile modulus were measured. Among all the drying technologies, creped through-air dry (CTAD) and creped through-air dry belt (CTADB) seemed to improve tissue softness most. The UCTAD maximized tissue bulk by drying the tissue web solely using a through-air (TAD) cylinder. Tissue samples with freeness between 575 to 650 mL seemed to have their properties improved more significantly through advanced drying technologies. It was found that the retail prices of these bath tissues were directly related to softness, bulkiness, water absorbency, and basis weight. A mathematical model was conducted to predict the retail price of bath tissue (based on product performance and attributes). This paper also identified the effect of “sustainability” on the retail price.

[1]  Yuhan Wang,et al.  Relationship between human perception of softness and instrument measurements , 2018, BioResources.

[2]  Hasan Jameel,et al.  Understanding the Effect of Machine Technology and Cellulosic Fibers on Tissue Properties – A Review , 2018 .

[3]  Kulland Evaluation of furnishes for tissue manufacturing; suction box dewatering and paper testing , 2012 .

[4]  Frank Asche,et al.  The Elusive Price Premium for Ecolabelled Products: Evidence from Seafood in the UK Market , 2011 .

[5]  A. K. Ray,et al.  A comparative study of the effect of refining on charge of various pulps. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[6]  Armanath Maitra,et al.  What is sustainability , 2010 .

[7]  A. Basu,et al.  Label Performance and the Willingness to Pay for Fair Trade Coffee: A Cross-National Perspective , 2008 .

[8]  J. Gigac,et al.  Influence of pulp refining on tissue paper properties , 2008, August 2008.

[9]  Martin A. Hubbe,et al.  WHAT HAPPENS TO CELLULOSIC FIBERS DURING PAPERMAKING AND RECYCLING? A REVIEW , 2007 .

[10]  Holger Hollmark,et al.  Measurement of tissue paper softness: A literature review , 2004 .

[11]  M. H. Gil,et al.  Hornification—its origin and interpretation in wood pulps , 2004, Wood Science and Technology.

[12]  Joop de Boer,et al.  Sustainability labelling schemes: the logic of their claims and their functions for stakeholders , 2003 .

[13]  The Basics of Creping in the Tissuemaking Process , 2016 .

[14]  Martin A. Hubbe,et al.  BONDING BETWEEN CELLULOSIC FIBERS IN THE ABSENCE AND PRESENCE OF DRY-STRENGTH AGENTS - A REVIEW , 2006 .