Simulation test of a head-worn display with ambient vision display for unusual attitude recovery

Head-Worn Displays (HWDs) are envisioned as a possible equivalent to a Head-Up Display (HUD) in commercial and general aviation. A simulation experiment was conducted to evaluate whether the HWD can provide an equivalent or better level of performance to a HUD in terms of unusual attitude recognition and recovery. A prototype HWD was tested with ambient vision capability which were varied (on/off) as an independent variable in the experiment testing for attitude awareness. The simulation experiment was conducted in two parts: 1) short unusual attitude recovery scenarios where the aircraft is placed in an unusual attitude and a single-pilot crew recovered the aircraft; and, 2) a two-pilot crew operating in a realistic flight environment with "off-nominal" events to induce unusual attitudes. The data showed few differences in unusual attitude recognition and recovery performance between the tested head-down, head-up, and head-worn display concepts. The presence and absence of ambient vision stimulation was inconclusive. The ergonomic influences of the head-worn display, necessary to implement the ambient vision experimentation, may have influenced the pilot ratings and acceptance of the concepts.

[1]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[2]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  DIFFERENCES IN IN-FLIGHT UNUSUAL ATTITUDE RECOVERY PERFORMANCE AND WORKLOAD , 2009 .

[3]  Fred H. Previc,et al.  Spatial Disorientation in Aviation , 2004 .

[4]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  A review of head-worn display research at NASA Langley Research Center , 2015, Defense + Security Symposium.

[5]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[6]  J. Raymond Comstock,et al.  The Effectiveness of Various Attitude Indicator Display Sizes and Extended Horizon Lines on Attitude Maintenance in a Part-Task Simulation , 2003 .

[7]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Head-worn displays for NextGen , 2011, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[8]  Michael A. Vidulich,et al.  Testing a Subjective Metric of Situation Awareness , 1991 .

[9]  M. A. Vidulich,et al.  The Use of Judgment Matrices in Subjective Workload Assessment: The Subjective Workload Dominance (SWORD) Technique , 1989 .

[10]  John A. Hassoun,et al.  Attitude Awareness Enhancements for the F-16 Head-Up Display , 1992 .

[11]  Jarvis J. Arthur,et al.  Design Considerations for Attitude State Awareness and Prevention of Entry into Unusual Attitudes , 2017 .

[12]  Fred H. Previc,et al.  THE "OUTSIDE-IN" ATTITUDE DISPLAY CONCEPT REVISITED , 1999 .

[13]  Thomas J. Sharkey,et al.  Display of Aircraft State Information for Ambient Vision Processing using Helmet Mounted Displays , 2000 .

[14]  Thomas W. Frey,et al.  Virtual HUD using an HMD , 2001, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[15]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Test and Evaluation Metrics of Crew Decision-Making And Aircraft Attitude and Energy State Awareness , 2013 .

[16]  John M. Reising,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a Background Attitude Indicator , 1999 .

[17]  R. M. Taylor,et al.  Situational Awareness Rating Technique (Sart): The Development of a Tool for Aircrew Systems Design , 2017 .

[18]  Le Vie,et al.  Survey of Quantitative Research Metrics to Assess Pilot Performance in Upset Recovery , 2016 .