Unmasking the mechanisms for Vernier acuity: evidence for a template model for Vernier acuity

The goal of this study was to evaluate the mechanisms underlying Vernier acuity, over a range of spatial scales using narrow-band Vernier stimuli and oblique masking. Specifically, the test stimuli consisted of a pair of vertical ribbons of horizontal cosine grating with a vertical Vernier offset between the ribbons. These stimuli have two important advantages for studying Vernier acuity: (1) they are relatively well localized in vertical spatial frequency, and (2) they are localized in their horizontal extent (width). We measured the orientation, spatial frequency and width tuning of Vernier acuity over a wide range of ribbon spatial frequencies, using a simultaneous oblique masking paradigm. Our masking results suggest that the mechanisms underlying Vernier acuity are tuned to the orientation, spatial frequency and width of the ribbon stimuli. The peak of the bimodal orientation tuning function varies systematically with the spatial frequency of the ribbon. The peak of the spatial frequency tuning function varies systematically with both the ribbon spatial frequency, and the ribbon width (i.e. the grating length). A 'template' model, in which the 'mechanism' is a windowed version of the stimulus is able to account for many features of the data, including results which cannot be easily accounted for by standard multi-scale filter models. Specifically, the template model can account for: (i) the bimodal orientation tuning function, (ii) the systematic variation in the peak of the orientation and spatial frequency tuning functions with spatial frequency, and (iii) the systematic effect of ribbon width on spatial frequency tuning.

[1]  G Westheimer,et al.  Editorial: Visual acuity and hyperacuity. , 1975, Investigative ophthalmology.

[2]  Bart Farell,et al.  Vernier acuity: Effects of chromatic content, blur and contrast , 1991, Vision Research.

[3]  R. Watt,et al.  The recognition and representation of edge blur: Evidence for spatial primitives in human vision , 1983, Vision Research.

[4]  Paul V McGraw,et al.  Vernier and contrast discrimination in central and peripheral vision , 2000, Vision Research.

[5]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[6]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Position acuity with opposite-contrast polarity features: Evidence for a nonlinear collector mechanism for position acuity? , 1996, Vision Research.

[7]  Arthur Bradley,et al.  Is reduced vernier acuity in amblyopia due to position, contrast or fixation deficits? , 1985, Vision Research.

[8]  D. Levi,et al.  Orientation, masking, and vernier acuity for line targets , 1993, Vision Research.

[9]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  “Weber's law” for position: the role of spatial frequency and contrast , 1992, Vision Research.

[11]  D. Whitaker.  What part of a vernier stimulus determines performance? , 1993, Vision Research.

[12]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Spatial scale of visual analysis for vernier acuity does not vary over time , 2000, Vision Research.

[13]  W S Geisler,et al.  Physical limits of acuity and hyperacuity. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[14]  Thom Carney,et al.  Can sinusoidal vernier acuity be predicted by contrast discrimination? , 1993, Vision Research.

[15]  D M Levi,et al.  Spatial alignment across gaps: contributions of orientation and spatial scale. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[16]  D M Levi,et al.  Binocular summation in vernier acuity. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[17]  Ian E. Holliday,et al.  The spatial localization deficit in amblyopia , 1992, Vision Research.

[18]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Differential spatial displacement discrimination thresholds for Gabor patches , 1988, Vision Research.

[19]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Discrimination of position and contrast in amblyopic and peripheral vision , 1994, Vision Research.

[20]  R. Watt,et al.  A theory of the primitive spatial code in human vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[21]  D. Regan,et al.  Postadaptation orientation discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[22]  Albert J. Ahumada,et al.  Technique to extract relevant image features for visual tasks , 1998, Electronic Imaging.

[23]  S. Klein,et al.  Hyperacuity thresholds of 1 sec: theoretical predictions and empirical validation. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[24]  H. Wilson,et al.  Spatial frequency tuning of orientation selective units estimated by oblique masking , 1983, Vision Research.

[25]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Responses of spatial mechanisms can explain hyperacuity , 1986, Vision Research.

[26]  D. Levi,et al.  Vernier acuity with plaid masks: the role of oriented filters in vernier acuity , 1997, Vision Research.

[27]  W. Geisler.  Sequential ideal-observer analysis of visual discriminations. , 1989, Psychological review.

[28]  C. F. Stromeyer,et al.  Low spatial-frequency channels in human vision: Adaptation and masking , 1982, Vision Research.

[29]  W. Richards,et al.  Mechanisms of contour curvature discrimination. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[30]  David Whitaker,et al.  Interaction of spatial frequency and separation in vernier acuity , 1991, Vision Research.

[31]  A J Mussap,et al.  Binocular processes in vernier acuity. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[32]  J. M. FINDLAY.  Feature Detectors and Vernier Acuity , 1973, Nature.