A systematic approach to infer biological relevance and biases of gene network structures

The development of high-throughput technologies has generated the need for bioinformatics approaches to assess the biological relevance of gene networks. Although several tools have been proposed for analysing the enrichment of functional categories in a set of genes, none of them is suitable for evaluating the biological relevance of the gene network. We propose a procedure and develop a web-based resource (BIOREL) to estimate the functional bias (biological relevance) of any given genetic network by integrating different sources of biological information. The weights of the edges in the network may be either binary or continuous. These essential features make our web tool unique among many similar services. BIOREL provides standardized estimations of the network biases extracted from independent data. By the analyses of real data we demonstrate that the potential application of BIOREL ranges from various benchmarking purposes to systematic analysis of the network biology.

[1]  James R. Knight,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Nature.

[2]  Maria Jesus Martin,et al.  The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003 , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[3]  Dmitrij Frishman,et al.  The PEDANT genome database in 2005 , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[4]  Michael Ruogu Zhang,et al.  Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. , 1998, Molecular biology of the cell.

[5]  May D. Wang,et al.  GoMiner: a resource for biological interpretation of genomic and proteomic data , 2003, Genome Biology.

[6]  Joan Brooks,et al.  Three yeast proteome databases: YPD, PombePD, and CalPD (MycoPathPD). , 2002, Methods in enzymology.

[7]  Dmitrij Frishman,et al.  The PEDANT genome database , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[8]  David Martin,et al.  GOToolBox: functional analysis of gene datasets based on Gene Ontology , 2004, Genome Biology.

[9]  Bing Zhang,et al.  GOTree Machine (GOTM): a web-based platform for interpreting sets of interesting genes using Gene Ontology hierarchies , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.

[10]  R. Ozawa,et al.  A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  D. Botstein,et al.  Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[12]  Dong Xu,et al.  Global protein function annotation through mining genome-scale data in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  R. Durbin,et al.  Pfam: A comprehensive database of protein domain families based on seed alignments , 1997, Proteins.

[14]  Francesco Pinciroli,et al.  GFINDer: Genome Function INtegrated Discoverer through dynamic annotation, statistical analysis, and mining , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[15]  Joaquín Dopazo,et al.  FatiGO: a web tool for finding significant associations of Gene Ontology terms with groups of genes , 2004, Bioinform..

[16]  Brad T. Sherman,et al.  DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery , 2003, Genome Biology.

[17]  Igor V. Tetko,et al.  Exploiting scale-free information from expression data for cancer classification , 2005, German Conference on Bioinformatics.

[18]  I. Ispolatov,et al.  Binding properties and evolution of homodimers in protein–protein interaction networks , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  P. Bork,et al.  Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes , 2002, Nature.

[20]  E. Lander,et al.  Remodeling of yeast genome expression in response to environmental changes. , 2001, Molecular biology of the cell.

[21]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Global Mapping of the Yeast Genetic Interaction Network , 2004, Science.

[22]  J. Ioannidis.  Why Most Published Research Findings Are False , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[23]  Hiroyuki Ogata,et al.  KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes , 1999, Nucleic Acids Res..

[24]  Igor V. Tetko,et al.  MIPS bacterial genomes functional annotation benchmark dataset , 2005, Bioinform..

[25]  Dmitrij Frishman,et al.  MIPS: analysis and annotation of proteins from whole genomes in 2005 , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[26]  Cathy H. Wu,et al.  InterPro, progress and status in 2005 , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[27]  Shoshana J. Wodak,et al.  CYGD: the Comprehensive Yeast Genome Database , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[28]  Cheng-Fu Chang,et al.  Calculating the statistical significance of physical clusters of co-regulated genes in the genome: the role of chromatin in domain-wide gene regulation. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[29]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry , 2002, Nature.

[30]  H. Mewes,et al.  The FunCat, a functional annotation scheme for systematic classification of proteins from whole genomes. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[31]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[32]  Eric Mjolsness,et al.  A mathematical and computational framework for quantitative comparison and integration of large-scale gene expression data , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[33]  H. Mewes,et al.  Functional modules by relating protein interaction networks and gene expression. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[34]  Steven C. Lawlor,et al.  MAPPFinder: using Gene Ontology and GenMAPP to create a global gene-expression profile from microarray data , 2003, Genome Biology.