Evaluation of cell culture on the polyurethane-based membrane (TegadermTM): implication for tissue engineering of skin

Background: The use of polymer-based delivery systems, on which cells are cultured and transferred, improves the ease of handling and transfer of the keratinocytes. A transparent polymer also allows observation of cell growth prior to grafting as well as re-epithelialization after grafting to the wound. We have developed techniques for cultured keratinocytes on TegadermTM (3M), an inexpensive and easily available polyurethane-based wound dressing, for treatment of burn and chronic wounds. In this study, we evaluate cell culture characteristics of three different cell types, human epidermal keratinocytes, human dermal fibroblasts and pig bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on Tegaderm membrane. Methods: Cells were isolated from human skin or pig bone marrow and cultured on membranes for a period of five days. Cell proliferation was assessed by colorimetric assay (MTT) and scanning electron microscopy. Results and conclusions: This study confirms that Tegaderm membranes support attachment and growths for these cell types, with those growth characteristics are similar, if not as good as that of optimal condition of tissue culture plastics. Data from our study suggest that Tegaderm membranes can be used, modified and developed further as an economical and easily available material for tissue engineered skin.

[1]  A. Ylppo Children's Clinic, Helsinki. , 1948, Lancet.

[2]  J. Mulliken,et al.  GRAFTING OF BURNS WITH CULTURED EPITHELIUM PREPARED FROM AUTOLOGOUS EPIDERMAL CELLS , 1981, The Lancet.

[3]  B. Gusterson,et al.  Cultured epithelium as a skin substitute. , 1987, Burns, including thermal injury.

[4]  S. Segawa,et al.  End of the beginning , 1990, Nature.

[5]  R. Odessey,et al.  Addendum: multicenter experience with cultured epidermal autograft for treatment of burns. , 1992, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[6]  J. Hansbrough,et al.  Skin replacements. , 1998, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[7]  P. Bianco,et al.  Stem cells in tissue engineering , 2001, Nature.

[8]  Dietmar W. Hutmacher,et al.  Evaluation of Ultra-Thin Poly(ε-Caprolactone) Films for Tissue-Engineered Skin , 2001 .

[9]  Keith Harding,et al.  Science, medicine and the future: healing chronic wounds. , 2002, BMJ.

[10]  L. Griffith,et al.  Tissue Engineering--Current Challenges and Expanding Opportunities , 2002, Science.

[11]  S. Boyce,et al.  Principles and practices for treatment of cutaneous wounds with cultured skin substitutes. , 2002, American journal of surgery.

[12]  S. MacNeil,et al.  Development of a plasma-polymerized surface suitable for the transplantation of keratinocyte-melanocyte cocultures for patients with vitiligo. , 2003, Tissue engineering.

[13]  Lucie Germain,et al.  Tissue‐engineered skin substitutes: from in vitro constructs to in vivo applications , 2004, Biotechnology and applied biochemistry.

[14]  P. Jimenez,et al.  Tissue and cellular approaches to wound repair. , 2004, American journal of surgery.

[15]  E. Eriksson,et al.  Wet wound healing: from laboratory to patients to gene therapy. , 2004, American journal of surgery.

[16]  Michael J Lysaght,et al.  Tissue engineering: the end of the beginning. , 2004, Tissue engineering.

[17]  H. Ehrlich Understanding experimental biology of skin equivalent: from laboratory to clinical use in patients with burns and chronic wounds. , 2004, American journal of surgery.

[18]  Andrew J.M. Boulton,et al.  Neuropathic Diabetic Foot Ulcers , 2004 .