Stimulating ‘green’ technological innovation: An analysis of alternative policy mechanisms

As our understanding of human impacts on the environment has increased, it has become clear that we need to move toward a closed-loop industrial society in order to avoid undesirable health and ecosystem consequences. Achievement of this goal depends on radical technological innovation in both products and processes. This paper explores how to design public policy mechanisms to stimulate rather than impede pollution-preventing technological innovation. It begins with a discussion of the role of government in civilian technology development and diffusion. It then sets out six design criteria for policy to promote ‘green’ technology innovation. Based on this set of design criteria, the article assesses the potential and limitations of current U.S. policy approaches to stimulate technological innovation that moves us toward a minimal waste society. The main conclusions of this assessment are as follows. Over the past decade, the U.S. environmental policy system has experienced a variety of reforms and new initiatives, many aimed directly at promoting environmentally-friendly technological change. The strengths of these reforms are to increase the information that the private sector has about the magnitude and cost of their environmental impacts and to allow greater flexibility in the technologies that firms choose to meet environmental regulations and goals. Because of these reforms, firms are likely to undertake technological innovation for the environment in situations with clear short-term economic benefits, i.e. to capture the much heralded win-win potential of environmental regulation. However, these reforms have significant weaknesses as well. Unless policy provides stronger political or economic incentives and clearer signals about future environmental performance requirements, we are unlikely to be able to drive technological innovation in industries where the pay-off is more longterm or uncertain, and thus will make only limited progress toward the goal of a minimal waste society.

[1]  Robert Dalpé,et al.  Effects of government procurement on industrial innovation , 1994 .

[2]  Harald Heimsoeth,et al.  The protection of the ozone layer , 1983 .

[3]  K. Pavitt Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[4]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[5]  Tom Tietenberg,et al.  Tradeable permits for pollution control when emission location matters: What have we learned? , 1995 .

[6]  Johan Schot,et al.  Constructive Technology Assessment and Technology Dynamics: The Case of Clean Technologies , 1992, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.

[7]  Nicholas A. Ashford,et al.  Using Regulation to Change the Market for Innovation , 1985 .

[8]  Dallas Burtraw,et al.  THE SO2 EMISSIONS TRADING PROGRAM: COST SAVINGS WITHOUT ALLOWANCE TRADES , 1996 .

[9]  David Wallace,et al.  Environmental policy and industrial innovation , 1995 .

[10]  Paul Ekins,et al.  Sustainable Trade: A New Paradigm for World Welfare. , 1995 .

[11]  Michael H. Levin,et al.  Implementing pollution prevention: Incentives and irrationalities , 1990 .

[12]  Manik Roy,et al.  Toxics use reduction in Massachusetts: The Blackstone Project , 1990 .

[13]  N. Ash́ford,et al.  Exploiting opportunities for pollution prevention in EPA enforcement agreements. , 1995, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Green and Competitive : Ending the Stalemate , 1996 .

[15]  S. Schmidheiny Changing Course: A Global Business Perspective on Development and the Environment , 1992 .

[16]  T. Graedel Industrial Ecology , 1995 .

[17]  Roy Rothwell,et al.  Industrial Innovation and Public Policy: Preparing for the 1980s and the 1990s , 1981 .

[18]  B. Smart,et al.  Beyond Compliance: A New Industry View of the Environment , 1992 .

[19]  Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieuhygiëne,et al.  Concern for tomorrow. A national environmental survey 1985-2010 , 1989 .

[20]  Arie Rip,et al.  Introduction of New Technology; Making Use of Recent Insights from Sociology and Economics of Technology , 1995 .

[21]  Nicholas A. Ashford,et al.  Regulation and Technological Innovation in the Chemical Industry , 1983 .

[22]  Robert A. Frosch,et al.  Industrial ecology: Adapting technology for a sustainable world , 1995 .

[23]  M. Stoughton An evaluation of voluntary programs as public policies for environmental protection , 1995 .

[24]  Chulho Jung,et al.  Incentives for Advanced Pollution Abatement Technology at the Industry Level: An Evaluation of Policy Alternatives , 1996 .

[25]  Richard G. Newell,et al.  Environmental policy and technological change: The effects of economic incentives and direct regulation on energy-saving innovation , 1997 .

[26]  D. Mowery,et al.  Inside the black box: The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies , 1993 .

[27]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[28]  I. Amato The crusade against chlorine. , 1993, Science.

[29]  J. Roessner Commercializing solar technology: The government role , 1984 .

[30]  A. Mannion,et al.  Environmental taxes in OECD countries: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Paris (1995) 99 pp paperback , 1997 .

[31]  A.Carl Kotchian The commercial aircraft industry , 1967 .

[32]  Robert Gottlieb Reducing toxics : a new approach to policy and industrial decisionmaking , 1995 .

[33]  Roy Rothwell,et al.  Industrial innovation and government environmental regulation: Some lessons from the past , 1992 .

[34]  Janet Ann ranganathan,et al.  Green Ledgers: Case Studies in Corporate Environmental Accounting , 1995 .

[35]  L. Branscomb Empowering technology: Implementing a U.S. strategy , 1993 .

[36]  Scott Milliman,et al.  Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control: Reply , 1992 .

[37]  V. Walsh Demand, public markets and innovation in biotechnology , 1993 .

[38]  Karl Hausker,et al.  The politics and economics of auction design in the market for sulfur dioxide pollution , 1992 .

[39]  G. F. Bennett Toxics watch 1995 , 1997 .

[40]  Ada S. Rousso,et al.  PACKAGING TAXES AND RECYCLING INCENTIVES: THE GERMAN GREEN DOT PROGRAM , 1994, National Tax Journal.

[41]  J. Brittain,et al.  The semiconductor industry. , 1978, Science.

[42]  Dianne Dumanoski,et al.  Our Stolen Future , 1996 .