Simulated Computer-Mediated/Video-Interactive Distance Learning: A Test of Motivation, Interaction Satisfaction, Delivery, Learning & Perceived Effectiveness

This paper reports on an innovative, computer-mediated, educational technology application in a simulated distance learning environment. As an initial evaluation, real student groups completed an entire university course using this state-of-the-art, two-way synchronous audio/visual communication technology, Distributed Tutored Video Instruction (DTVI). The study reported here explored student perceptions of a simulated distance learning environment using the system. The learning environment was characterized by videotaped lectures by the course instructor, delivered in computer-mediated small group settings. Six separate groups made up of six to eight students and a facilitator were studied. Group members were in separate locations, interacting via synchronous audio and visual computer channels. Our findings indicate an overall high level of perceived effectiveness and satisfaction with the instructional mode. In addition, significant relationships were established between facilitator effectiveness and student satisfaction, student motivation and class participation, student exam grades and perceived amount of group discussion. Findings indicate innovations in computer-mediated instructional designs can achieve desired levels of participant interaction considered critical to effective distance education technology.

[1]  Gregory D. Bothun Distance Education: Effective Learning or Content-Free Credits?. , 1998 .

[2]  Lessons in Developing Distance Learning. , 1996 .

[3]  Jerry Andriessen,et al.  Learning through synchronous electronic discussion , 2000, Comput. Educ..

[4]  G. Savage,et al.  Experimental and experiential approaches to teaching face‐to‐face and computer‐mediated group discussion , 1996 .

[5]  Michal Beller,et al.  The Crossroads between Lifelong Learning and Information Technology, A Challenge Facing Leading Universities , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[6]  William Bramble,et al.  Designing effective video teletraining instruction: The Florida Teletraining Project , 1996 .

[7]  Randall B. Smith,et al.  Virtual Collaborative Learning: A Comparison between Face-to-Face Tutored Video Instruction (TVI) and Distributed Tutored Video Instruction (DTVI) , 1999 .

[8]  Alasdair McLean,et al.  The Potential of Live Teacher Supported Distance Learning: A Case-Study of the Use of Audio Conferencing at the University of Aberdeen , 1996 .

[9]  Scott A. Myers,et al.  Student perceptions of instructor immediacy in conventional and distributed learning classrooms , 1998 .

[10]  Ping Zhang A Case Study on Technology Use in Distance Learning , 1998 .

[11]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Correlates of Learning in a Virtual Classroom , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[12]  Shousan Wang,et al.  Computer-Assisted Instruction Effectiveness...A Brief Review of the Research , 1993 .

[13]  Maria Stenseth The Mystery of History. , 1996 .

[14]  Steven C. Rockwell,et al.  The effect of communication, writing, and technology apprehension on likelihood to use new communication technologies , 1997 .

[15]  J. Eddy,et al.  Technology assisted education , 1997 .

[16]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Distance learning: a CHI 97 special interest group , 1997, SGCH.

[17]  Derek R. Lane,et al.  A review and assessment of national educational trends in communication instruction , 1999 .

[18]  Scott A. Kuehn Computer‐mediated communication in instructional settings: A research agenda , 1994 .

[19]  T Greenhalgh,et al.  Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical education , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  Learning modes: an investigation of perceptions in five Kent classrooms , 1995 .

[21]  Margaret Gorts Morabito Foundations of Distance Education. , 1997 .

[22]  S. Meisel,et al.  Screen to Screen Versus Face to Face: Experiencing the Differences in Management Education , 1999 .

[23]  Connie L. Dillon,et al.  Distance Education: Learning Outcomes, Interaction, and Attitudes , 1992 .

[24]  J. Raymond Albrektson Mentored Online Seminar: A Model for Graduate-Level Distance Learning , 1995 .

[25]  L. Neal Distance Learning , 1998, CHI 1998.

[26]  John F. Wedman,et al.  Instructional design project success factors: An empirical basis , 1997 .

[27]  Karen L. Murphy,et al.  Competencies for distance education professionals , 1995 .

[28]  Laura K. Guerrero,et al.  Associations between Nonverbal Behaviors and Initial Impressions of Instructor Competence and Course Content in Videotaped Distance Education Courses , 1998 .

[29]  Joan M. Mazur Applying Insights from Film Theory and Cinematic Technique to Create a Sense of Community and Participation in a Distributed Video Environment , 2000, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[30]  Robert LaRose,et al.  Audiographic Telecourses for the Web: An Experiment , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[31]  Alfred Bork,et al.  Distance learning and interaction: Toward a virtual learning institution , 1995 .

[32]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Community Development Among Distance Learners: Temporal and Technological Dimensions , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[33]  Gary M. Shulman,et al.  “What's in it for me?”: Increasing content relevance to enhance students' motivation , 1995 .

[34]  C. Abrahamson,et al.  AUTHOR: CRAIG E. ABRAHAMSON TITLE: ISSUES IN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION IN DISTANCE EDUCATION , 1999 .

[35]  De Vries,et al.  The Interactivity Component of Distance Learning Implemented in an Art Studio Course , 1996 .

[36]  Jane Seale,et al.  Reflection on-line or off-line: the role of learning technologies in encouraging students to reflect , 2000, Comput. Educ..

[37]  Diane M. Christophel The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning , 1990 .

[38]  Gerard George,et al.  Technology-Assisted Instruction in Business Schools: Measured Effects on Student Attitudes, Expectations and Performance , 1996 .

[39]  Scott L. Althaus Please Scroll down for Article Communication Education Computer-mediated Communication in the University Classroom: an Experiment with On-line Discussions , 2022 .

[40]  A. Hollingshead Information Suppression and Status Persistence in Group Decision Making The Effects of Communication Media , 1996 .

[41]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Educational Applications of CMCS: Solving Case Studies through Asynchronous Learning Networks , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[42]  J. Greer,et al.  Computer support for collaboration in medical education. , 2000, Clinical and investigative medicine. Medecine clinique et experimentale.

[43]  Chris Dede,et al.  The Evolution of Distance Learning: Technology-Mediated Interactive Learning , 1989 .

[44]  David J. Lundberg Integrating On‐Line Technology Into Counseling Curricula: Emerging Humanistic Factors , 2000 .

[45]  John G. Hedberg,et al.  The Human‐Technology Interface: Designing for Open and Distance Learning∗ , 1989 .