Modelo de requisitos e componentes técnicos para a formação e gerência de redes de cooperação entre empresas da construção civil

The operational method of civil construction can be analyzed by the outlook of virtual organizations, however not yet structuralized, hence not providing competitive advantages. Thus, this article considers a Technical Components and Requirements Model, based on EKD methodology (Enterprise Knowledge Development), to assist in the formation and management of networks in civil construction companies. For the elaboration of the considered model, an analysis of the most important international construction projects was conducted, in addition to a case study from seven construction projects in order to detect their goals and defective points, to then be reorganized and adapted to the Brazilian civil construction industry. Moreover, the considered model was also based on an adaptation of reference architecture for civil construction networks. As a result, the proposal makes possible, to the stakeholders, a clear view of the necessary requirements, exploring the necessity of intense communication and exchange of information, besides contributing to future research works regarding a future development of an information system directed for this economic segment.

[1]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Exploring Critical Success Factors for Partnering in Construction Projects , 2004 .

[2]  彭朱如,et al.  Competition and Cooperation Intensity in a Network -- A Case Study in Taiwan Simulator Industry , 2005 .

[3]  Charles H. Buhman.  Oncoming wave of collaboration , 2003 .

[4]  Kai Mertins,et al.  Architectures, methods and tools for enterprise engineering , 2005 .

[5]  Heng Li,et al.  Construction Partnering Process and Associated Critical Success Factors: Quantitative Investigation , 2002 .

[6]  H. Pfohl,et al.  Inter‐organizational logistics systems in flexible production networks , 2000 .

[7]  Samuel B. Moore,et al.  Creating and managing a virtual inter-organizational learning network for greener production: a conceptual model and case study , 2006 .

[8]  Celson Lima,et al.  The bcXML: supporting eCommerce and knowledge management in the construction industry , 2003, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[9]  Keys to Effective Virtual Global Teams , 2001 .

[10]  Alain Zarli,et al.  Requirements and Technology Integration for IT-Based Business-Oriented Frameworks in Building and Construction , 1999, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[11]  Tim Torvatn,et al.  Building relationships for technological innovation , 2004 .

[12]  Mario Rese,et al.  Successful and sustainable business partnerships: How to select the right partners , 2006 .

[13]  Andrew N. Baldwin,et al.  The use of electronic information exchange on construction alliance projects , 1999 .

[14]  Succeeding in the communiputer age: Technology and the marketing mix , 1996 .

[15]  Robert L. Heneman,et al.  Human resource management in virtual organizations , 2002 .

[16]  R. Butler,et al.  Managing Instability in Cross-Cultural Alliances , 2003 .

[17]  Robert L. Carraway,et al.  Making the transition to collaborative buyer–seller relationships: An emerging framework , 2006 .

[18]  Christopher J. Hemingway,et al.  Making organisations virtual: the hidden cost of distributed teams , 2004, J. Inf. Technol..

[19]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Relational Selection for Collaborative Working Arrangements , 2005 .

[20]  Matthew Wetherill.  Knowledge management for the construction industry: the e-cognos project , 2002, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[21]  Michael Ehret,et al.  From relationships to partnerships—new forms of cooperation between buyer and seller , 2006 .

[22]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  Contractor as trust initiator in construction partnering : Prisoner's dilemma perspective , 2005 .

[23]  Charles R. Glagola,et al.  Partnering on Defense Contracts , 2002 .

[24]  Tarek M. Hassan,et al.  The eLegal project: specifying legal terms of contract in ICT environment , 2001, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[25]  Simon Harvey,et al.  Enabling the construction virtual enterprise: the OSMOS approach , 2001, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[26]  L. Eriksson,et al.  Success is not enough : The spectacular rise and fall of a strategic alliance between two multinationals , 2005 .

[27]  William M. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Strategic Alliances and the Management of Intellectual Properties: The Art of the Contract , 2005 .

[28]  François Vernadat,et al.  Enterprise modeling and integration : principles and applications , 1996 .

[29]  Kurt Kosanke,et al.  CIMOSA: enterprise engineering and integration , 1999 .

[30]  Celson Lima,et al.  eConstruct: expectations, solutions and results , 2001, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[31]  Akintola Akintoye,et al.  An analysis of success factors and benefits of partnering in construction , 2000 .

[32]  Theodore J. Williams,et al.  The Purdue Enterprise Reference Architecture , 1992, DIISM.

[33]  Alberto Albuquerque Gomes.  Yin, Robert K. Estudo de caso - Planejamento e metodos. Porto Alegre, Bookman, 2005 , 2008 .

[34]  Cyril Tomkins,et al.  Interdependencies, trust and information in relationships, alliances and networks , 2001 .

[35]  Don E. Kash,et al.  Self-organizing innovation networks: implications for globalization , 2004 .

[36]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Potential for Implementing Relational Contracting and Joint Risk Management , 2004 .

[37]  M. Torkkeli,et al.  The contribution of technology selection to core competencies , 2002 .

[38]  Bob Travica,et al.  Virtual organization and electronic commerce , 2005, DATB.

[39]  Fiorenza Belussi,et al.  A typology of networks: flexible and evolutionary firms , 1998 .

[40]  O. Jones.  Managing public–private partnerships: the enactment of a new business venture , 2005 .