Design of toy proteins capable of rearranging conformations in a mechanical fashion

We design toy protein mimicking a machinelike function of an enzyme. Using an insight gained by the study of conformation space of compact lattice polymers, we demonstrate the possibility of a large scale conformational rearrangement which occurs (i) without opening a compact state, and (ii) along a linear (one-dimensional) path. We also demonstrate the possibility to extend sequence design method such that it yields a “collective funnel” landscape in which the toy protein (computationally) folds into the valley with rearrangement path at its bottom. Energies of the states along the path can be designed to be about equal, allowing for diffusion along the path. They can also be designed to provide for a significant bias in one certain direction. Together with a toy ligand molecule, our “enzimatic” machine can perform the entire cycle, including conformational relaxation in one direction upon ligand binding and conformational relaxation in the opposite direction upon ligand release. This model, however schematic, should be useful as a test ground for phenomenological theories of machinelike properties of enzymes.

[1]  E. Shakhnovich,et al.  Theory of kinetic partitioning in protein folding with possible applications to prions , 1998, Proteins.

[2]  H Frauenfelder,et al.  Solvent viscosity and protein dynamics. , 1980, Biochemistry.

[3]  Lars Edman,et al.  The fluctuating enzyme: a single molecule approach , 1999 .

[4]  R J Fletterick,et al.  Nucleotide switches in molecular motors: structural analysis of kinesins and myosins. , 2001, Current opinion in structural biology.

[5]  Chen Zeng,et al.  Emergence of highly designable protein‐backbone conformations in an off‐lattice model , 2001, Proteins.

[6]  E. Shakhnovich,et al.  Engineering of stable and fast-folding sequences of model proteins. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  James M. Caruthers,et al.  A combinatorial algorithm for effective generation of long maximally compact lattice chains , 1995 .

[8]  Walter H. Stockmayer,et al.  Monte Carlo Calculations on the Dynamics of Polymers in Dilute Solution , 1962 .

[9]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: A synthesis , 1994, Proteins.

[10]  M. Gerstein,et al.  A database of macromolecular motions. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[11]  A. Grosberg.  REVIEWS OF TOPICAL PROBLEMS: Disordered polymers , 1997 .

[12]  P. S. Kim,et al.  High-resolution protein design with backbone freedom. , 1998, Science.

[13]  J. Onuchic,et al.  KINETICS OF PROTEINLIKE MODELS : THE ENERGY LANDSCAPE FACTORS THAT DETERMINE FOLDING , 1995 .

[14]  Vijay S. Pande,et al.  On the role of conformational geometry in protein folding , 1999 .

[15]  Stanley B. Prusiner,et al.  Nobel Lecture: Prions , 1998 .

[16]  Toshio Yanagida,et al.  Direct observation of single kinesin molecules moving along microtubules , 1996, Nature.

[17]  James H. Brown,et al.  The fourth dimension of life: fractal geometry and allometric scaling of organisms. , 1999, Science.

[18]  C W McClare,et al.  Chemical machines, Maxwell's demon and living organisms. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  E. Shakhnovich,et al.  Formation of unique structure in polypeptide chains. Theoretical investigation with the aid of a replica approach. , 1989, Biophysical chemistry.

[20]  L. A. Bli︠u︡menfelʹd,et al.  Biophysical Thermodynamics of Intracellular Processes: Molecular Machines of the Living Cell , 1994 .

[21]  L. Amaral,et al.  Small-world networks and the conformation space of a short lattice polymer chain , 2000, cond-mat/0004380.

[22]  ENZYME KINETICS, SELF-ORGANIZED MOLECULAR MACHINES, AND PARAMETRIC RESONANCE , 1997 .

[23]  P. Anfinrud,et al.  Chemical dynamics in proteins: the photoisomerization of retinal in bacteriorhodopsin. , 1998, Science.

[24]  R C Ball,et al.  How many conformations can a protein remember? , 2001, Physical review letters.

[25]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation , 1985 .

[26]  K A Dill,et al.  Are proteins well-packed? , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[27]  V. Pande,et al.  On the transition coordinate for protein folding , 1998 .

[28]  R. Baldwin.  Matching speed and stability , 1994, Nature.

[29]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection. , 1997, Science.

[30]  R. Hernandez,et al.  A minimalist model protein with multiple folding funnels , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  Computational protein design. , 1999, Structure.

[32]  Guido Tiana,et al.  Protein folding, evolution and design , 2001 .

[33]  Ned S. Wingreen,et al.  Designability, thermodynamic stability, and dynamics in protein folding: A lattice model study , 1998, cond-mat/9806197.

[34]  Alexander S. Mikhailov,et al.  Mutual Synchronization of Molecular Turnover Cycles in Allosteric Enzymes , 1998 .

[35]  M. Newman,et al.  Exact solution of site and bond percolation on small-world networks. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[36]  E I Shakhnovich,et al.  A test of lattice protein folding algorithms. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Unexpected scenario of glass transition in polymer globules: an exactly enumerable model. , 1999, Physical review letters.