Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Clinical Findings in Medical Imaging Exams in a Nationwide Israeli Health Organization: Observational Study

BACKGROUND The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic had a major effect on consumption of healthcare services. Changes in the use of routine diagnostic exams, increased incidences of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PCS), and other pandemic-related factors, may have influenced detected clinical conditions. OBJECTIVE The study aimed to analyze the impact of COVID-19 on the use of outpatient medical imaging services and clinical findings therein, specifically focusing on the time period after the launch of the Israeli COVID-19 vaccination campaign. In addition, the study tested whether the observed gains in abnormal findings may be linked to PCS or COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS Our dataset included 572,480 ambulatory medical imaging patients in a national health organization, from January 1, 2019 to August 31, 2021. We compared different measures of medical imaging utilization and clinical findings therein, before and after the surge of the pandemic, to identify significant changes. We also inspected the changes in the rate of abnormal findings during the pandemic after adjusting for changes in medical imaging utilization. Finally, for imaging classes that showed increased rates of abnormal findings, we measured the causal associations between COVID-19 infection, hospitalization (indicative of COVID-19 complications), and vaccination and future risk for abnormal finding. To allow adjustment for a multitude of confounding factors, we used causal inference methodologies. RESULTS After the initial drop in the utilization of routine medical imaging due to the first COVID-19 wave, the number of these exams has increased, but with lower proportions of older patients, patients with comorbidities, women, and vaccine-hesitant patients. Furthermore, we observed significant gains in the rate of abnormal findings, specifically in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance (MR-MSK) and brain computed tomography (CT-brain) exams. These results also persisted after adjusting for the changes in medical imaging utilization. Demonstrated causal associations included: COVID-19 infection increasing the risk for an abnormal finding in a CT-brain exams (odds ratio [OR] of 1.4, with 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 1.7); and COVID-19-related hospitalization increasing the risk for abnormal findings in an MR-MSK exam (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.9 to 5.3). CONCLUSIONS COVID-19 impacted the use of ambulatory imaging exams, with greater avoidance among patients at higher risk for COVID-19 complications: older patients, patients with comorbidities, and non-vaccinated patients. Causal analysis results imply that PCS may have contributed to the observed gains in abnormal findings in MR-MSK and CT-brain exams, respectively. CLINICALTRIAL

[1]  Winnie A Mar,et al.  Musculoskeletal Manifestations of COVID-19: Currently Described Clinical Symptoms and Multimodality Imaging Findings , 2022, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[2]  V. Giordano,et al.  What Do We Need to Know About Musculoskeletal Manifestations of COVID-19? , 2022, JBJS Reviews.

[3]  J. London,et al.  Evolving Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cancer-Related Encounters , 2022, JCO clinical cancer informatics.

[4]  David A. Drew,et al.  Self-reported COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and uptake among participants from different racial and ethnic groups in the United States and United Kingdom , 2022, Nature communications.

[5]  Á. Lanas,et al.  The impact of COVID-19 pandemic in the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer patients , 2022, Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology.

[6]  P. Barbieri,et al.  Lifestyle and mental health 1 year into COVID-19 , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[7]  R. Peeters,et al.  Prevalence and determinants of healthcare avoidance during the COVID-19 pandemic: A population-based cross-sectional study , 2021, PLoS medicine.

[8]  V. Chernyak,et al.  Review of COVID-19, part 2: Musculoskeletal and neuroimaging manifestations including vascular involvement of the aorta and extremities , 2021, Clinical Imaging.

[9]  A. Israeli,et al.  Addressing vaccine hesitancy and access barriers to achieve persistent progress in Israel’s COVID-19 vaccination program , 2021, Israel Journal of Health Policy Research.

[10]  M. Mazza,et al.  Will Nothing Be the Same Again?: Changes in Lifestyle during COVID-19 Pandemic and Consequences on Mental Health , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[11]  P. Najt,et al.  Brain imaging in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review , 2021, Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health.

[12]  E. Giovannucci,et al.  Has COVID-19 Affected Cancer Screening Programs? A Systematic Review , 2021, Frontiers in Oncology.

[13]  A. Steptoe,et al.  Longitudinal changes in physical activity during and after the first national lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic in England , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[14]  Minjung Lee,et al.  Avoidance of Healthcare Utilization in South Korea during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[15]  Elizabeth F. Jackson,et al.  Assessing the indirect effects of COVID-19 on healthcare delivery, utilization and health outcomes: a scoping review , 2021, European journal of public health.

[16]  D. Brodie,et al.  Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome , 2021, Nature Medicine.

[17]  Raju Vaishya,et al.  Musculoskeletal manifestations of COVID-19 , 2021, Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma.

[18]  G. Troiano,et al.  Vaccine hesitancy in the era of COVID-19 , 2021, Public Health.

[19]  C. Nunes,et al.  Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy , 2021, Vaccines.

[20]  I. Scott,et al.  Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilisation of healthcare services: a systematic review , 2021, BMJ Open.

[21]  T. Wong,et al.  Applications of digital health for public health responses to COVID-19: a systematic scoping review of artificial intelligence, telehealth and related technologies , 2021, npj Digital Medicine.

[22]  M. Hernán,et al.  BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in a Nationwide Mass Vaccination Setting , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  C. Horbinski,et al.  Musculoskeletal involvement of COVID-19: review of imaging , 2021, Skeletal Radiology.

[24]  Maureen A Smith,et al.  Disparities in the Use of In-Person and Telehealth Primary Care Among High- and Low-Risk Medicare Beneficiaries During COVID-19 , 2021, Journal of patient experience.

[25]  M. Tully,et al.  Changes in physical activity and sedentary behaviours from before to during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown: a systematic review , 2021, BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine.

[26]  A. Gholamrezanezhad,et al.  Neuroimaging findings in COVID-19: A narrative review , 2020, Neuroscience Letters.

[27]  S. Saccardo,et al.  Lifestyle and mental health disruptions during COVID-19 , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  G. Gigli,et al.  Stroke in patients with COVID-19: Clinical and neuroimaging characteristics , 2020, Neuroscience Letters.

[29]  Wei Wang,et al.  Early prediction of disease progression in COVID-19 pneumonia patients with chest CT and clinical characteristics , 2020, Nature Communications.

[30]  J. Antel,et al.  Neurological complications of coronavirus infection; a comparative review and lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[31]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID-19 , 2020, Nature Medicine.

[32]  M. Heneka,et al.  Immediate and long-term consequences of COVID-19 infections for the development of neurological disease , 2020, Alzheimer's Research & Therapy.

[33]  B. Ebert,et al.  The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care , 2020, Nature Cancer.

[34]  Weiliang Tang,et al.  Chest CT for detecting COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy , 2020, European Radiology.

[35]  Hugh Chen,et al.  From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees , 2020, Nature Machine Intelligence.

[36]  Joel Nothman,et al.  SciPy 1.0-Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python , 2019, ArXiv.

[37]  Tianqi Chen,et al.  XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System , 2016, KDD.

[38]  G. Chodick,et al.  Renal impairment among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis from a large health plan in Israel , 2015, Archives of Osteoporosis.

[39]  G. Chodick,et al.  Prevalence and Factors Associated With Resistant Hypertension in a Large Health Maintenance Organization in Israel , 2014, Hypertension.

[40]  Elizabeth A Stuart,et al.  Prognostic score-based balance measures can be a useful diagnostic for propensity score methods in comparative effectiveness research. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[41]  G. Chodick,et al.  The use of an automated patient registry to manage and monitor cardiovascular conditions and related outcomes in a large health organization. , 2011, International journal of cardiology.

[42]  P. Austin An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies , 2011, Multivariate behavioral research.

[43]  G. Chodick,et al.  A retrospective study of the incidence of diagnosed Type 1 diabetes among children and adolescents in a large health organization in Israel, 2000–2008 , 2011, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[44]  Skipper Seabold,et al.  Statsmodels: Econometric and Statistical Modeling with Python , 2010, SciPy.

[45]  G. Chodick,et al.  The epidemiology of diabetes in a large Israeli HMO , 2002, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[46]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .