Temporal and Spatial Visual Masking. I. Masking by Impulse Flashes

Masking is defined as the change in threshold energy eT*(τ) of a test stimulus T induced by a masking stimulus M of energy eM as a function of the relative time τ of occurrence. Masking is maximum when T and M occur simultaneously. A slight decrease in threshold for tests preceding the masking impulse by about 0.1 sec was explained as an alteration in appearance of the subsequent masking flash by a “subthreshold” test flash. Impulse-contrast threshold eT*/eM was investigated for masking impulses M of seven different energies superimposed on five backgrounds B. The increases in test threshold caused by M and by B were found to be independent and a modified Weber’s law (adjusted contrast threshold Cδ*≈0.1) held approximately. This conclusion was supported in a supplementary investigation of Cδ* using a category-rating-scale method.Impulse masking results were applied to predicting the masking peak at the onset of a long flash by treating the first 60 msec as an impulse. The lowering of thresholds of tests delayed in a long masking flash implied other detection mechanisms (e.g., temporal resolution). Theoretical predictions accounted for 94% and 97% of the variance in two relevant experiments, correctly predicting the effect of masking-flash duration and of background intensity.In both steady and intermittent light, masking is attributed primarily to fast processes (time constant ≪1 sec) which presumably have a neural rather than a photochemical basis.

[1]  R. Dodge An improved exposure apparatus. , 1907 .

[2]  L. L. Holladay Action of a Light-Source in the Field of View in Lowering Visibility , 1927 .

[3]  B. H. Crawford The change of visual sensitivity with time , 1937 .

[4]  C. H. Graham,et al.  BRIGHTNESS DISCRIMINATION AS A FUNCTION OF THE DURATION OF THE INCREMENT IN INTENSITY , 1938, The Journal of general physiology.

[5]  M. Keller The relation between the critical duration and intensity in brightness discrimination. , 1941 .

[6]  A. Rose,et al.  The Relative Sensitivities of Television Pickup Tubes, Photographic Film, and the Human Eye , 1942, Proceedings of the IRE.

[7]  H. Vries The quantum character of light and its bearing upon threshold of vision, the differential sensitivity and visual acuity of the eye , 1943 .

[8]  B. H. Crawford Visual adaptation in relation to brief conditioning stimuli , 1947, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[9]  A. Rose The sensitivity performance of the human eye on an absolute scale. , 1948, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[10]  H. D. Baker,et al.  The instantaneous threshold and early dark adaptation. , 1953, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[11]  Rapid changes in foveal sensitivity resulting from direct and indirect adapting stimuli. , 1954, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[12]  W. R. Bush,et al.  Foveal light adaptation as affected by the spectral composition of the test and adapting stimuli. , 1955, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[13]  M. A. Bouman On Foveal and Peripheral Interaction in Binocular Vision , 1955 .

[14]  W. R. Biersdorf Critical duration in visual brightness discrimination for retinal areas of various sizes. , 1955, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[15]  H. D. Baker,et al.  Some direct comparisons between light and dark adaptation. , 1955, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[16]  R. M. Herrick Foveal luminance discrimination as a function of the duration of the decrement or increment in luminance. , 1956 .

[17]  R M BOYNTON,et al.  On responses in the human visual system as a function of adaptation level. , 1957, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[18]  R. M. Boynton On-responses in the human visual system as inferred from psychophysical studies of rapid-adaptation. , 1958, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[19]  H. Barlow Temporal and spatial summation in human vision at different background intensities , 1958, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  I H WAGMAN,et al.  Neural limitations of visual excitability. I. The time course of monocular light adaptation. , 1959, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[21]  Neural limitations of visual excitability: II. Retrochiasmal interaction , 1959 .

[22]  G. Brindley,et al.  The discrimination of after‐images , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  Early dark adaptation to dim luminances. , 1959, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[24]  James P. Egan,et al.  Operating Characteristics Determined by Binary Decisions and by Ratings , 1959 .

[25]  G. Sperling Negative Afterimage without Prior Positive Image , 1960, Science.

[26]  M. B. Bender,et al.  Neural limitations of visual excitability: alterations produced by cerebral lesions. , 1960, Archives of neurology.

[27]  Mitsuo Ikeda,et al.  Study of Flicker by Increment Threshold Technique , 1961 .

[28]  J SWETS,et al.  Decision processes in perception. , 1961, Psychological review.

[29]  I H WAGMAN,et al.  Neural limitations of visual excitability. IV. Spatial determinants of retrochiasmal interaction. , 1962, The American journal of physiology.

[30]  Robert M. Boynton,et al.  Psychophysical Estimates of On-Responses to Brief Light Flashes* , 1962 .

[31]  H. Hake,et al.  Visual discrimination, and interpretation in terms of detectability theory. , 1962, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[32]  R M BOYNTON,et al.  Visual responses to equally bright stimuli of unequal luminance. , 1962, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[33]  W A RUSHTON,et al.  Increment threshold and dark adaptation. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[34]  J NACHMIAS,et al.  STUDY OF ABSOLUTE VISUAL DETECTION BY THE RATING-SCALE METHOD. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[35]  H R BLACKWELL,et al.  Neural theories of simple visual discriminations. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.